Nobody's talking about watching hockey in class. We're talking about studying a social and possibly religious phenomena relating to a hockey team.
And frankly, "WE HAS MORE HOCKEY TRADITION"? Nowhere did I claim the east has the most hockey tradition. Of course you out west have a great deal of hockey tradition, you're Canadians too. You might even have more than we do, I don't know.
What I claimed - what I continue to claim - is that Quebec has an extremely *integrated* hockey tradition. That is, you can't just separate hockey tradition and ignore it while studying Quebec. It plays a central, defining role in our history and culture.
There's a reason Maurice Richard got a state funeral and provincial flags flown at half-mast when he died. The 1955 Richard riots (French-Canadians banding together over French-Canadian Richard's suspension by English-Canadian league comissioner Campbell) are a major turning point in the history of Québec, leading to the 1960s Quiet Revolution (you know, that time we stopped being Conservatives Roman-Catholic and became Secular Social-Democrats), and, perhaps more importantly, the rise of modern Québec nationalism, built on the same idea that we French-Québecers must band together against the English and the ROC. Hence the twin independence referendum, the ongoing lack of Québec in the constitution, the Parti and Bloc Québécois, etc.
What I also claimed is that Québecers have a tendency to use religious terms in reference to hockey in general, and the Canadiens specifically.
When you have something that takes a central role in a culture, and people of that culture refers to it in religious terms, then it's not altogether dumb to analyze it from the point of view of a religion.