Lemme analyze the situation bit more... And I think I can find the correct scum by totally validating ATPG's arguments against me.
Day 1/
Seon must die for this overacting.
See, Pizza votes for me. Now my scummy self is smart. I would see that post by pizza and say "Ah ha! Thatdude pizzaguy's totally trying to bait me into saying something really really scummy." Really really scummy thing such as an OMGUS or asking a reason for that obviously totally random vote. So since I am a smart scum and is on to ATPG's little tricks, I would just ignore it completely. Now AtPG's a smart town and is on to my scummy self's little tricks. He had predicted that I would do so and goes off making a case based on my silence to his benefit. See, he knows that my townie self will never be able to resist biting the bait like a normal scum and thinks that my silence in uncharacteristic. He thinks hat doing so would make my scummy self panic and reply the normal way that a scum behaves, which I did by OMGUSing him.
See, by doing so, my scumminess becomes an almost guarantee. But oh look! Classical hero voted for AtPG too! So it sets off gears going in my head. Only a scum wants AtpG to die in day 1. What if I am scum, and what If c_h is my scum buddy?
The next day, AtPG devises an awesome case that proves, without a doubt, that I am totally scum and deserves to be hung from a melting tree made of solid fluorine until I die of cloudier poisoning. People begin to nod their heads in agreement...and what's this? Classical hero QUESTIONS the validity of AtPG's obviously perfect reasoning and
says that he will vote for AtPG if AtPG's proven wrong. Obviously only scum will do that. Even an obviously perfect reasoning can be wrong, but that is no reason to lynch the reasoner.
Ergo I declare, based on completely logical deduction based on thread behavior, that I am scum and classical hero is my scum buddy.
Let's lynch classical today and me tomorrow, people, and we should be home by Christmas.