I lean towards 2 cities. Building a single city could eventually have bigger production. But in the short to medium term 2 smaller cities will have larger production and commerce potential.
There is only one food resource in the area, instead of a good city we will end up with a mediocre and a bad one.
There is only one food resource in the area, instead of a good city we will end up with a mediocre and a bad one.
I still do not agree. We need one city that will be a production powerhouse that in the future will be able to pump out tanks in 1 turn and build spaship parts in 2 turns. That area has the potential for such a city. Lets not spoil it to get the whale resource and another gold!
cav scout said:City 8
1 corn
2 grassland
2 plains
4 grass hills
6 plains hills
Indiansmoke said:City 8
1 corn
3 grassland
3 plains
3 grass hill
4 plains hill
2 tundra hills (1 with fur)
I still do not agree. We need one city that will be a production powerhouse that in the future will be able to pump out tanks in 1 turn and build spaship parts in 2 turns. That area has the potential for such a city. Lets not spoil it to get the whale resource and another gold!
Yea I guess Cav scouts suggestion is only slightly worst long term and the benefit of a second city will propably outweight that. However I think that id we go for 2 cities second should be on the gold to max out water tiles. the benefit of commerce from 3 extra water tiles will outweight the gold and we will agin +1 hammer in city tile.