Omega Drivers vs. Regular Drivers

aimeeandbeatles

watermelon
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
20,112
Has anybody else used the Omega drivers?

They're supposed to be more stable than regular ones (as in not requiring a 6-hour reinstall every two weeks), and I'm gonna try using them for my ATI Radeon Xpress 200 (the crummy integrated) series.

I'll install them after school today.
 
yes, such as my mom keeps hitting the reset button (too lazy to shutdown properly) and that messes up the drivers and I have to reinstall.
 
They're good for older GPU's. For new GPU's you want to use official drivers, especially for something like nVidia ( I dont know how good CUDA and PhysX support is with Omega drivers).
 
I know mine's not a new one. It's at least from 2006.
 
Depending on which model of the X200 IGP it is, its from either 2004 or 2005. The only differences between the 3 IGP's are that two are 130nm fab's while the other one is 110nm. One of the 130nm's can support max 256mb memory, while the other two are max 128mb.
 
I'm not quite sure how you'd measure that.
HWiNFO32 (the hardware thingy I use) says this:
Video Chipset: ATI Radeon Xpress 200 (RS482)
Video Memory: 32 MBytes

Video Card: ATI RADEON XPRESS 200/1100/1150 (RS482/RS485) - Video Adapter [ECS EliteGroup Computer]

It also says the video bus is PCI.
 
Thats the newest IGP. RS482 came out in June 2005, RS400 was March 2005 and RS480 was Nov 2004.
 
Thank you.
 
Back
Top Bottom