I'm a registered Republican.Actually, Fred Phelps is a registered democrat...so in that respect, he is in the same category as you and Obama.
I'm a registered Republican.Actually, Fred Phelps is a registered democrat...so in that respect, he is in the same category as you and Obama.
So I assume you are more dismissive of the far less qualified Obama then?
Thank you, bigfatron, for explaining the situation better than I could. Like you, I'm not in the US, so I'm not that familiar with what Obama has and hasn't done. But last night I did some research on Sarah Palin, and her so-called "experience"... and by any Canadian definition except Paul Martin/Brian Mulroney (arguably two recent Canadian PMs who were/are up to their ears and beyond in corruption), she ran her town in a despicably corrupt way. She used her mayoral office to further her higher political ambitions (else why would the Republican party endorse her for mayor?). She used her mayoral office to settle personal scores with people who displeased her. Trying to ban books and cutting funding to museums and educational programs doesn't strike me as something that's done for the good of the people. It's something that our own Alberta Conservative party would do -- after all, keep the people entertained and stupid and they'll be more inclined to vote with their emotions, rather than with logical reasoning.Depends on what you describe as qualified I guess?
I'm not US-based so may not understand these things as well, but his experience seems to be a few years in a minor state senate and a few more in the national senate, during which he has written some books but not generated any meaningful legislation.
Her experience seems to be a few years as mayor of a large village and eighteen months as governor of a backwater state, during which she has got herself in to some considerable trouble through corrupt practice.
I don't see either as having great practical experience, but it does seem odd from a Republican perspective to have chosen a VP with no real history if your main point of advantage is the relative experience of your candidate.
BFR
she ran her town in a despicably corrupt way.
She used her mayoral office to further her higher political ambitions (else why would the Republican party endorse her for mayor?).
She used her mayoral office to settle personal scores with people who displeased her.
Swampwater would be more like it, given all the politicians up there under indictment.I dont understand all this 'backwater' state crap.
I'm going by her Wikipedia page, which has been locked to edits until September 8 at the earliest, so it hasn't been tampered with. It includes accounts of her firing people for arbitrary and trivial reasons (arguably personal in one or two cases) and not allowing municipal department heads to talk to reporters without her permission. What happened to this "free speech" you people worship?False, I challenge you to name one instance of corruption.
...
Races for mayor almost always supported by the two major parties. Nothing special here.
...
False, these laughable accusations have been refuted at lenght already.
I'm a registered Republican.
I'm going by her Wikipedia page, which has been locked to edits until September 8 at the earliest, so it hasn't been tampered with.
It includes accounts of her firing people for arbitrary and trivial reasons (arguably personal in one or two cases)
and not allowing municipal department heads to talk to reporters without her permission. What happened to this "free speech" you people worship?
In Canada -- at least in the smaller cities -- it's unthinkable for provincial or federal political parties to openly endorse mayoral or council candidates.
Municipal politics isn't supposed to be about anything but the good of the city, town, village, etc. It's not to be used to further ambitions of higher office.
Howard Dean was governor of Vermont, which has less population than Alaska even.
I dont understand all this 'backwater' state crap.
Howard Dean was governor of Vermont, which has less population than Alaska even.
No one commented about it being so small when he was running to be the dem candidate in 2004.
I dont get it beyond the typical attempt to denigrate someone they dont agree with.
Personally, I'd like to ask her two questions:
"How do you feel about your teenage single daughter's pregnancy, considering that you are against sex education, and believe in abstinence before marriage is the only way to go?"
"Don't you think you should have warned your party's leadership of the fact that you have a teenage single daughter who is pregnant? Specially considering your party's views on such matters?" (and NO, I don't think she did...)
McCain strikes me as having some genuine history, but his idea of drilling his way out of the gas shortage is so laughable as to make me question his credentials to be taken seriously.
BFR
Oh, really? You think I am heathen and can't debate some theology?
Like I said later, the Christian mindset is not = the conservative mindset. So why do they love the sinner in this case but not love other sinners that don't matter to them? The answer is oh so clear.
The couple have five children: sons Track (born 1989) and Trig (born 2008), and daughters Bristol (born 1990), Willow (born 1995), and Piper (born 2001).
I was surprised that she repeated the bridge to nowhere line, as her flip-flop on that issue should be pretty well known by now.