1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Dismiss Notice
  6. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

Playing without the slider...

Discussion in 'Civ5 - Strategy & Tips' started by remconius, Sep 7, 2010.

  1. Ahriman

    Ahriman Tyrant

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2008
    Messages:
    13,266
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    I think you need to edit it some more, for clarity.
    Make that "0 or less research income". If you are saying 0 or less gold income, then this does not appear to be correct.

    If you have zero gold in your treasury, 11 research income, and -5 gold per turn, you will *not* have a unit disbanded. Instead, you will only get 6 research per turn.

    And your post seems off: in Civ5 as well as Civ4, negative gold income can be made up with the loss of science. Civ4 makes you move the slider, Civ5 deducts it out of your science income directly.
    The core mechanic is the same; making actual bankruptcy (forcing unit disbandment) a rare occurrence that only occurs when your expenses are greater than the sum of both your gold income and your research income.
     
  2. lemmy101

    lemmy101 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    1,064
    My point is that the two systems are separated by the removal of the sliders. I wasn't aware of the deducting from science aspect that was news to me, but the point of my post still remains, that your only way of manipulating how much money / science you get is by increasing those directly, not by just reducing the other.

    And to clarify further: If you get to -5 and you're still in deficit (apparently taking into account science which I wasn't aware happened) THEN you disband a unit.

    My point was mainly that disbanding of units did happen, which the poster I quoted said it didn't... as I say I didn't know about the science thing when I originally wrote the post.
     
  3. remconius

    remconius Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Messages:
    2,465
    Location:
    Amstelveen, NL
    Updated the first slide with some more details.
     
  4. Auncien

    Auncien Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2010
    Messages:
    431
    Agreed.
     
  5. beestar

    beestar subdeity

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,580
    Location:
    Pacific Standard Time
    Did you include the mechanism where surplus happiness generates Great People? That's the benefit from small empires, vs. using the happiness to grow population and empire size.
     
  6. KrikkitTwo

    KrikkitTwo Immortal

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Messages:
    12,283
    Happiness does not generate Great People, it generates Golden ages.
     
  7. Drawmeus

    Drawmeus Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2007
    Messages:
    1,213
    A problem in essentially all previous civ games is that whatever uses they give you for gold are always outweighed by spending it on science. The only times when you could realistically consider using gold for anything other than pure research were when you got a huge amount of it (e.g. Great Merchant in cIV) and could max out science for a long time. You could then do fun things like, um, buy techs from the AIs? Disconnecting the two (so you CAN'T just spend it on science) means spending it on more minor things is feasible, and making that feasible means that its worth the developers time to make more of those minor things for you to spend it on.

    Good all around, I'd say.
     
  8. beestar

    beestar subdeity

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2005
    Messages:
    1,580
    Location:
    Pacific Standard Time
    Oops, thanks for the correction.
     
  9. Pazyryk

    Pazyryk Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2008
    Messages:
    3,585
    Well, the game designers clearly read my post on this topic and responded appropriately ;).
     

Share This Page