bioelectricclam
Warlord
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2006
- Messages
- 244
So I'm planning on running another challenge mission alongside my Ninja one (I have the time so I might as well), this one probably a bit more ambitious and difficult, so I would like some pre-game advice.
The challenge is to duplicate the Jules Verne novel "From the Earth to the Moon", that is, get a man on the Moon by the year 1865, on Prince difficulty. What this means gamewise is that I will have completed the Apollo program by this date, or else lose the challenge. Impossible? Most likely. Fun to try? You betcha!
So far as rules will go, I'm allowed to use any means necessary short of reloading -cottages, great people, stealing techs with infiltrate, you name it. However, I am NOT allowed to pick and chose my leaders - no Pericles of Korea allowed! This means that primarily what I want to plan for the pre-game is which leader and/or civ I will pick. That's the problem I am having though: whether to pick a civ based upon its unique building or leaders personality - not to mention starting technologies. After doing a bit of research, these seem like the best choices, so I'll list them out with my thoughts and then let you all discuss who you'd pick and why:
Korea: Seowon comes mid-game, but it seems like the most powerful research-oriented UB that I can get early enough to make a difference, and Wang Kon's Financial trait isn't that shabby either. As a bonus they start with Mysticism, meaning early monasteries and a bit of a jump start on Masonry and the Pyramids.
Mali: Huge money gains early through Mint and Mansa's Financial trait, and Spiritual means I can switch civics and religions on the fly without sacrificing research time. Early wheel could mean a lead on getting Writing and Pottery.
Rome: Augustus offers fast wonders, which would be good for grabbing early GP, and the Forum UB would only boost that bonus even further. Fishing and Mining aren't all that great starter techs though, and Imperialistic is only slightly beneficial (I won't be warring much and once you get a few food sources settlers come quickly as is).
England: Elizabeth has a good combo of Philosophical and Financial (good GP and cottage support), and although England's UB comes a bit later it stacks nicely with her traits and will be available early enough to make a difference. They are in the same boat as Rome when it comes to starting techs, though.
India: Ghandi's Philosophical and Spiritual are decent teching traits, but otherwise not supported so well by their UB...although Fast Workers would be nice for getting some Cottages ASAP I suppose. Mysticism is a good starting tech.
Egypt: Hatshepsut's Creative is nice for an early lead on libraries, though not sure it matches that well with Spiritual. UB is for culture and early Great Prophets, which isn't really going to help me research the techs I need. Starting with Wheel is alright for getting Pottery fast.
France: Louis XIV has a strong combination of traits in Industrious and Creative (he can get wonders fast and then get GP fast using the wonders), and has a jump start on Pottery with the Wheel. UB technically is a research building, but its bonuses vs. regular Observatories is a culture, not a research, one.
Greece: Best leader traits in my opinion in Pericles, with the killer combination of Philosophical and Creative (early libraries for even earlier Great Scientists). To boot, he begins with the tech I'd most want for free: Hunting, which means early scouts and a much better chance of finding a tech from a goodie hut. Bad news is his UB just won't be getting me those beakers.
Dutch: Willem van Oranje has an interesting combination in Creative and Financial, which would give me a decent boost to early research that would hopefully carry on throughout the game with financial. Points against him are his late UB that won't really benefit me research-wise and weak starting techs.
So those are the contenders; looking over it I'm sort of partial to Elizabeth or Mansa Musa, but there's a lot to be said for the other leaders as well. The more input I have the better prepared I'll be for this challenging challenge, so please share your thoughts and opinions, I'm all ears.
The challenge is to duplicate the Jules Verne novel "From the Earth to the Moon", that is, get a man on the Moon by the year 1865, on Prince difficulty. What this means gamewise is that I will have completed the Apollo program by this date, or else lose the challenge. Impossible? Most likely. Fun to try? You betcha!
So far as rules will go, I'm allowed to use any means necessary short of reloading -cottages, great people, stealing techs with infiltrate, you name it. However, I am NOT allowed to pick and chose my leaders - no Pericles of Korea allowed! This means that primarily what I want to plan for the pre-game is which leader and/or civ I will pick. That's the problem I am having though: whether to pick a civ based upon its unique building or leaders personality - not to mention starting technologies. After doing a bit of research, these seem like the best choices, so I'll list them out with my thoughts and then let you all discuss who you'd pick and why:
Korea: Seowon comes mid-game, but it seems like the most powerful research-oriented UB that I can get early enough to make a difference, and Wang Kon's Financial trait isn't that shabby either. As a bonus they start with Mysticism, meaning early monasteries and a bit of a jump start on Masonry and the Pyramids.
Mali: Huge money gains early through Mint and Mansa's Financial trait, and Spiritual means I can switch civics and religions on the fly without sacrificing research time. Early wheel could mean a lead on getting Writing and Pottery.
Rome: Augustus offers fast wonders, which would be good for grabbing early GP, and the Forum UB would only boost that bonus even further. Fishing and Mining aren't all that great starter techs though, and Imperialistic is only slightly beneficial (I won't be warring much and once you get a few food sources settlers come quickly as is).
England: Elizabeth has a good combo of Philosophical and Financial (good GP and cottage support), and although England's UB comes a bit later it stacks nicely with her traits and will be available early enough to make a difference. They are in the same boat as Rome when it comes to starting techs, though.
India: Ghandi's Philosophical and Spiritual are decent teching traits, but otherwise not supported so well by their UB...although Fast Workers would be nice for getting some Cottages ASAP I suppose. Mysticism is a good starting tech.
Egypt: Hatshepsut's Creative is nice for an early lead on libraries, though not sure it matches that well with Spiritual. UB is for culture and early Great Prophets, which isn't really going to help me research the techs I need. Starting with Wheel is alright for getting Pottery fast.
France: Louis XIV has a strong combination of traits in Industrious and Creative (he can get wonders fast and then get GP fast using the wonders), and has a jump start on Pottery with the Wheel. UB technically is a research building, but its bonuses vs. regular Observatories is a culture, not a research, one.
Greece: Best leader traits in my opinion in Pericles, with the killer combination of Philosophical and Creative (early libraries for even earlier Great Scientists). To boot, he begins with the tech I'd most want for free: Hunting, which means early scouts and a much better chance of finding a tech from a goodie hut. Bad news is his UB just won't be getting me those beakers.
Dutch: Willem van Oranje has an interesting combination in Creative and Financial, which would give me a decent boost to early research that would hopefully carry on throughout the game with financial. Points against him are his late UB that won't really benefit me research-wise and weak starting techs.
So those are the contenders; looking over it I'm sort of partial to Elizabeth or Mansa Musa, but there's a lot to be said for the other leaders as well. The more input I have the better prepared I'll be for this challenging challenge, so please share your thoughts and opinions, I'm all ears.