-Prethread- NCNESIOT: Blackened Skies

Are stats up to date/finalized?
 
They are not fully finalized yet, I am aiming ideally for a weekend start though with the last pieces of background being completed and Stas finalized
 
Here is the FINAL History post. We are just getting the last few stat fixes and issues worked out, and we are ready to roll!

-------

The British defeat in the Fourth Anglo American War sent shockwaves throughout Europe. The immediate impact was the chaos that hit the global markets. The French Third Republic, a liberal republic with officially mandated union representation in government affairs, saw the shockwaves hit their economy and was toppled in the subsequent rioting. The subsequent Fourth Republic maintained a mixture of a capitalist and syndicalist economy, causing some industries to become state owned, and then, as Socialist parties walked out of a new coalition government, the Fourth Republic collapsed and the Fifth Republic took shape as a Socialist state. Other countries, particularly Germany, Russia, and Italy, saw a hit to their economies as well, spawning some significant internal dissent to be crushed.

It was not only the economic climate that suffered though. The weakening of British power brought serious questions about their ability to both act to maintain a balance of power, such so that the German Empire felt no fear when they launched an invasion of France in 1909, and later Belgium in 1911. The advent of the Fifth Anglo-American War in 1910 further emboldened Italy to launch its own invasion of the Ottoman Empire, no longer fearful of a British intervention.

The following decade simply became known popularly as “The Decade from Hell” as conflicts erupted around the globe. The United States found success for the first time in the Pacific Ocean against the British, invading the Philippines and threatening Dutch Indonesia, but the British-Canadian defense of Eastern Canada, particularly Nova Scotia and Montreal, was nearly impossible for the Americans to overrun and casualties mounted.With the Second Franco-Prussian War in full swing, Germany was forced to pull troops back from Austria-Hungary, emboldening Russia to declare war on Austria-Hungary in 1911.

After a few years of war though, many of the societal issues that were thought to have been suppressed reared their ugly heads once more. Owing both to military defeat in Canada and the rising in Ireland, the United Kingdom was forced to make a humiliating peace with the United States, surrendering the last of Canada in hopes of removing the source of conflict between the two countries, ending what the Americans called “The Greatest Crusade”. However, as one door closed, another opened. As the German war effort collapsed due to revolutions in Bavaria and the Rhine, Belgian revolutionaries took back their country after three years of occupation, followed closely by the Netherlands. The British were able to take the colonies of all three nations without firing a shot, significantly consolidating their position in the South Pacific and Africa. However, a bigger failure came with the failure to decisively turn back the German Revolution, despite the success of combating both the Dutch and Belgian revolutions (mostly due to French unwillingness to directly combat the British) and for the fact that Russia had initiated an invasion of Eastern Prussia (beaten at the edges of Berlin and pushed back slightly).Other, non socialist risings had victories too, such as the Fascists in Turkey, and ultra nationalists in Serbia and Portugal.

Revolution would not be limited to Europe either. The Qing Dynasty saw a near fatal collapse in 1916 and has been since fighting a fourteen year civil war. The Kingdom of Thailand saw an insurrection and establishment of a radically militant Buddhist regime. Central and South America saw a reversal of their traditions of inequality with large peasant revolutions in the USCA and Venezuela (though Brazil’s was still a traditional worker’s revolution). The United States too saw its own internal dissent in 1917 with the “Great Rising”, becoming the first nation to successfully subdue its own internal mass socialist revolution. In face of this intense dissent, many nations that did not succumb to socialism turned to hardline policies not seen since the 18th century.

------

The 1920’s, after the hell that was the 10’s, was a time for recovery in Europe, as regimes consolidated their positions and rebuilt their economies and armies. Britain, America, Austria, and even Russia are seeing significant economic growth, particularly fueled by the conflict in China, though in all four countries income inequality is higher than ever before and continues to rise. France and Germany have rebuilt shattered ties to create a powerful European bloc. The German economic miracle, fueled by French aid and incredible increases in productivity, has made the German economy the largest in the world. The French people are enjoying one of the world’s highest standards of living, though the specter of conflict in Indochina and Algeria hangs over their head. Meanwhile, Russia continues to plot its expansion, its Tsar dreaming of ruling an empire stretching from Lisbon to Vladivostok. And as the strength of nations return, the leaders of the world look beyond their own consolidated power bases, eager to add at the expense of their enemies.

We are no longer in the calm before the storm. We are hearing the thunder before the lightning. And when you look above, you can see the world is covered by Blackened Skies.
 
Important ideologies

Buddhism-While a variety of schools of Buddhism exists, of particular importance to international affairs is the so called rise of “Jōdo Shinshū” or, “Pure” Buddhism. These Purists have their roots in the Ikko Ikki rebellions of Japan, and found refuge in Korea, China, and Southeast Asia due to the eventual arrival of the United States in Japan. This Purist strain is noted for its heavily militant stances, its teachings of equality, and its rabidly anti-Western political teachings. Indeed, aside from their embrace of Western Arms, the Purists detest the West and everything it stands for. Even Socialism, despite its teachings of equality for all (a core Purist belief) is stained by the French occupation of Indochina. Politically, Purists prefer a monarchy still, though under heavy guidance from a council of monks. The Purists form the core of the Japanese resistance to America, and the Burmese resistance to Britain.

Illiberal Democracy-A term recently coined by a French political theorist, an illiberal democracy is a system with either significant authoritarian tendencies and usually a ban on left wing political parties and unions. Political repression can take a variety of different forms, taking away rights from those of “lesser” races or those outside of the political and economic elite. These states are generally less repressive than most monarchies, though the opportunity for real political choice and change is fairly limited and is kept in the service of powerful monied interests.

Socialist parties have greatly varied over the past several years. Here are the major political forces in Socialism today:

Spoiler :

Social Democratic Party, Socialist Party
Economics: French syndicalism
Means to Power: reform
Multi-party or Single-Party: multi-party (French support free and fair elections... within a Socialist state)
Position on French Colonies: pro-colonial
Position on French-German War: patriotic (we should support our country going to war to vie for power)

Revolutionary Socialist Party, Revolutionary Social Democratic Party, Workers' Party, Radical Democratic Workers'Party, etc. (any combo of these various key phrases)
Economics: French syndicalism (it's the only working variant, so the default)
Means to Power: revolutionary (split because reform took to long)
Multi-party or Single-Party: ambiguous (site of conflict)
Position on French Colonies: ambiguous (site of conflict)
Position on French-German War: ambiguous (site of conflict, some would go one way or the other)

Progressive Socialist Party, Progressive Workers' Party, etc.
Economics: French syndicalism
Means to Power: reform
Multi-party or Single-Party: multi-party (this is a single issue party, against colonies, and would only really occur in France)
Position on French Colonies: anti-colonial
Position on French-German War: ambiguous (site of conflict)

Collectivist Party
Economics: central planning (there's probably a few fringe Socialists who think the economy should be collectively planned, and probably only in France or Bavaria would there be enough democratic tradition for them to form a political party all about that issue)
Means to Power: unimportant
Multi-party or Single-Party: single-party (central planning could probably be done in a multi-party setting, but it's probably more theoretically consistent to support single-party state)
Position on French Colonies: unimportant
Position on French-German War: unimportant

Jaegerist Party (Ruhr)
Economics: central planning
Means to Power: revolution
Multi-party or Single-Party: single-party (we are One)
Position on French Colonies: unimportant
Position on French-German War: revolutionary defeatist ("We should undermine the German war effort for socialism")

Red Workers' Party, Red Socialist Party (this is basically a Spartacist Party that believes in authentic syndicalism)
Economics: French syndicalism
Means to Power: revolution
Multi-party or Single-Party: single-party
Position on French Colonies: unimportant
Position on French-German War: unimportant


*Socialist parties courtesy of J.K. Stockholme*
 
Damn... Britain has had a hard time.

When do you think this will launch?
 
The Korean Empire

Spoiler :

While none of the Asian countries were able to say that they “beat” the Europeans at their own game of Imperialism, one could argue that Korea is doing quite well for itself. Aside from the loss of Jeju, Korea has successfully played off British, Qing, Dutch, and now Russian and American powers against one another. During this time, the Koreans were able to trade influence in their country for protection and assistance against outside powers, retaining its independent position in Asia. When the Korean King Yi Jong ascended the throne in 1861, Korea underwent a great period of internal change and instability that would have consumed the country if it were it ruled by a lesser man. Yi Jong, at the young age of 19, realized that Korea must modernize if it were to survive as an independent nation. When the Korean nobility decided that Jong’s reforms threatened their own power, they attempted to turn to the Qing, and Yi Jong in turn looked to Russia for an ally, and earned a hard fought victory. And when the Russians looked to expand further into East Asia, the Koreans used the Americans, giving them the island of Jeju as a port, to take action against the Russians. It was after these two victories and the further collapse of the Qing that Yi Jong declared himself Emperor, equal to that of the Qing Emperor and the disposed Japanese Emperor.

It seemed that the future held continued success for the Korean people, and it was in many ways exemplified by the Crown Prince and Chancellor Yi Yeong. Yeong had great ambitions for Korea, including a British style parliament and a German style military to allow Korea to chart an independent course. However, the 1900s and 1910s brought intense instability to Korea. Due to the demands of the American diplomats, Protestant missionaries were allowed to operate freely in Korea, and had converted roughly 30-40% of the population. Many of these Christians took pro-Western and anti-traditionalist views of Korean society, and even as Korea liberalized the presence of the monarchy and their heathen beliefs was a stain upon the Korean nation. These radical Christian reformers assassinated Yi Yeong, causing great anguish for Emperor Yi Jong. While the United States would be able to prevent a massacre and an end to the missions, they did agree to take an influx of Korean Christians that would be exiled (many forming combat units in the US military), roughly 10% of the Christian Korean population, though many followed.

This exile of the Christian population caused a severe shortage of educated personnel, as many of those educated in the West were Christian converts. Even for those non Christians who were educated and reformist were held in contempt by the Emperor, who began a reactionary backlash. Several planned industrial park projects were cancelled, and Korean students studying abroad slowed to a trickle. Most of the Crown Prince’s reforms were stalled or reversed, and the conservative nobility, long weakened, saw a resurgence of their former power. However, when a major land reform that had enriched peasant farmers was reversed, the Great Imo Peasant rebellion and the subsequent Gabo reforms ended the reactionary backslide.

As the 1910s ended and the 20s began, Korea once more opened its markets and saw economic growth, particularly from the Chinese Civil War and the industries associated with war. After nearly two decades of strife, it has been a welcome respite to see Korea growing once more. However, the root of the problem has yet to go away. The battle for Korea’s soul continues between the conservative Yangban and the reformist scholars, with Christians looming as a powerful third force. And worse still, the Emperor recently celebrated his 88th birthday and mourned the death of his last living son. Only the grandchildren remain, and there seems to be intense infighting over who will be the next Emperor of Korea (or if some have their way, if there is to be a next Emperor of Korea). If Korea can persevere this next storm, a grand opportunity in China beckons to them still. But if not, then perhaps the 69 years of the Great Yi Jong will have been for nothing when Russia and America pick over the corpse of the former Korean Empire.



Holy Kingdom of Thailand


Spoiler :


The Holy Kingdom of Thailand, until recently known as Siam, owed its independence mostly due to the need for a buffer state for France and the United Kingdom. As French influence rose in Vietnam, and the British expanded into Vietnam, Siam was able to establish good relations with both countries and keep itself as a neutral state, belonging simultaneously to both spheres and to neither.

However, the French transition to socialism greatly disturbed this relationship, and put Siam in the middle of an uncomfortable cold war. Due to both the French possession of Thai territories, as well as aligning socially more with Imperial Britain, the Siamese took the side of the British more and more, gaining benefits and aid to their modernization efforts as they went further into Britain’s sphere.

However, this all changed during the Burmese Revolution of 1916, when a group of anti-imperialist monks failed to cast out the British. After four years of fighting, the Burmese monks and fighters fled into neighboring Siam. The British demanded that the Siamese turn over the Burmese, and the Siamese were initially willing to comply. However, an anti-modernist backlash led by a group of influential Bikkhu found sympathetic ears in the military. A group of junior officers led a palace coup, and were able to dispose Rama VI, and installed Rama VII, who announced to the Thai people that he would establish a new Kingdom of Thailand, a constitution and roll back the excesses of the nobility and guarantee new rights for the Thai peasantry. The military took this opportunity to eliminate the Princes and the nobility, seeing them as parasites and checks on their own power, but were careful to avoid confrontation with the Bikkhu, who in turn have used their control of the loyalty of the peasantry to increase their own power.

Today, Thailand’s King is a puppet, playing a new balancing act between his generals and the Bikkhu. While the generals control the Thai military, the Bikkhu have taken control of the country’s economy, reorienting the old noble estate style economy into a new economy revolving around the temple, as well as raising their own peasant militias. However, in all of this chaos, there is opportunity. The Vietnamese are in rebellion, angered of the socialist reforms and seeing a revival of the Buddhist faith in that country, likely egged on by powers hostile to France. And in British Burma, there is still lingering resentment from the rebellion 14 years ago. Perhaps, Thailand can be the center of a great new power in Southeast Asia?
 
How... How in heaven the Americans turn out to be these supermissionaries able to convert millions in a handful of decades?
 
Bloody Protestants. Ya let one German preacher go at your church, and then, 3 centuries later, they're in Korea.
 
It's just that Christians are everywhere. They are little better than vermin. D:
 
Welcome aboard! I have to finish the Chinese Civil War situation, Turkey/Balkans, and the American background post (mostly done), and then we should be all set!

The Dominion of South Africa

Spoiler :


The Dominion of South Africa can be said to have three distinct groups; those of British ancestry, those of Dutch Afrikaner ancestry, and those of native African ancestry (only the first two matter politically). Much of South African policy is the struggle between the first two groups, in particular of whether or not to support the United Kingdom in their continuous wars against the United States. Many in the pro-independence “National Party” sought to actually ally with the United States during the Fourth Anglo-American War and break free of Great Britain, though British naval supremacy saw any American assistance foiled. The end of the Boer War and the inclusion of Afrikans into the government would prove to help preserve the unity of the empire. Despite the harsh feelings still remaining towards the British, those who actively oppose Britain are now in the minority, with many seeing the black African population as the greater threat. After the reconciliation between the two, South Africans actively volunteered to fight for Britain, fighting particularly well in the Pacific theater. During the Communist rising in the Netherlands, South African troops were among those sent due to the heavy cultural ties in the region and many Afrikans saw Britain in a new, more positive light after they helped save the Dutch from Communism.

Today, South Africa is closer than it ever has been to Britain, but there is still a substantial minority that wishes to completely break with Britain. Many see the British Tom Black as the ideal of someone who would be tough on African issues, and are very worried that a Britain under Edmund Burke might insist on a French style “equality of the races”. And in that situation, South Africa would likely have no further desire to remain in the Empire….


The Dominion of Australasia

Spoiler :
Initially established as a penal colony, the colonies of Australia and New Zealand grew rapidly in the wake of the Third Anglo American War, with many seeing Canada as a potentially dangerous place to live due to the hostile United States. Immigrants from Italy, Russia, and Ireland came to Australia, and to a lesser extent New Zealand. As the colonies grew larger, self rule was granted, and Australasia as it was called sent troops to fight in the Fourth Anglo-American War. As the United States expanded its presence in the Western Pacific, Australasia too sought to expand its own fleet. Due to the barriers that the Indonesian archipelago would provide, Australasia opted for a submarine fleet that could run interdiction missions against a potential American invasion fleet. While the Americans would not significantly threaten Australasia directly, the Australasian fleet saw some significant successes in the Indonesian campaign, significantly hampering the American invasion of Indonesia and weakening the American South Pacific Fleet. This culminated in the battle of the Makassar Straits, where British and Australasian forces

As American forces withdrew from Indonesia, they opted to leave equipment for a network of nationalist fighters on Borneo. With Dutch forces completely in disarray due to the Communist rebellion in the Netherlands, Dutch garrison troops were unable to quell the rebellion, and the unrest eventually spread throughout the archipelago. With British troops needed in Europe, and Indian troops bogged down with internal issues, Australasian troops were forced to take point on breaking the rebellion. While eventually successful, the unpopular war and the subsequent mandate Australasia was given over Indonesia, nominally until 1960, has many protesting. The continued need for conscription has not made anything easier. Will Australasia embrace its new role within the Empire? Or will the growing anti imperial and even socialist voices only grow louder and louder?


The Dominion of India

Spoiler :


Long considered the crown jewel of the British Empire, India’s role has only grown as Britain suffered its inglorious defeats. The establishment of the Raj in place of the East India Company’s rule established a firm chain of command and organization, with the provincial governments taking orders from Calcutta, and Calcutta taking orders from London. Initially, the ideal was that the Empire’s direct management of Indian affairs, including the expansion of the bureaucracy.

India would, due to its large population and proximity to the conflict, take part in the Fourth and Fifth Anglo-American Wars, where Indian troops would be used heavily in the Pacific theater. It was after the defeat in the Fifth War that Britain was forced to placate their “Martial Races” by significantly increasing their autonomy and also crackdown on the “Agricultural Races” in an effort to stem the tides of a possible rebellion in the wake of the defeat. While the crackdown was initially effective (save for in Burma, where a rebellion took four years to put down), the stage has been set for a large scale civil war. The agricultural races are, at long last, starting to unite in their opposition to both the British and the martial races, promoting a pan-Indian identity. The martial races meanwhile remain fiercely divided, still bickering among themselves and compete for British favor. Were it not for the unifying authority of the British Empress, the martial races would be be just as likely to fight one another as they would the agricultural races. The British viceroy and bureaucracy sees the situation as mostly positive, confident that so long as a rebellion does not coincide with another war with America, the combined might of Australasia, Britain, and the martial races would be more than enough to crush a rebellion. However, each day the pan-Indian movement gains new followers and adherents, and its sheer mass of numbers would give any commander pause.

For now though, the Viceroy continues to rule from Calcutta, taking orders from London as they come. His alliances with the various Rajas keeps him in power, though worrying anti-Indian rhetoric from London continues to cross his desk, making him wonder if the fascists are looking to lose what little loyalty the Indians hold for the regime. For their part, while some Indians are joining the pro-Independence movement, a plurality sees independence as a likely bloodbath, and hopes to remain under British rule. Whatever happens, India is clearly going to play a major role in the decades to come. India’s massive amounts of resources and cheap labor could be the engine for massive industrial and economic growth, and keeps Britain as the most powerful nation in the world so long as it remains with the Empire. But even with all of this potential, it may be too much for even the British to hold onto, and if they cannot, what will happen to India? Regional principalities? A united great power? Only time will tell….
 
Australasia too sought to expand its own fleet. Due to the barriers that the Indonesian archipelago would provide, Australasia opted for a submarine fleet that could run interdiction missions against a potential American invasion fleet. While the Americans would not significantly threaten Australasia directly, the Australasian fleet saw some significant successes in the Indonesian campaign, significantly hampering the American invasion of Indonesia and weakening the American South Pacific Fleet. This culminated in the battle of the Makassar Straits, where British and Australasian forces

Where what? What happened? Tell us!
 
Nothing ornate for the flag of the Ruhr, a humble republic of workers. Seeing as in TTL the first socialist state isn't peasant-majority Russia, I would imagine sickles would not be in vogue. So our flag is a simple hammer representing the working class imposed on a red flag of revolution.

Spoiler :
9ljbCHc.png
 
Well, the Bavarian Worker's Republics will adopt the following flags:

Civil:

Spoiler :
See next page.


Military: our enemies will bow down before the red flag..

Spoiler :
Socialist_red_flag.svg
 
Bavaria has become Bayern Munchen.
 
Back
Top Bottom