Prove God Exists - Act Three

Status
Not open for further replies.
Garbarsardar: Neat. By all means post more. You might also consider that the number 8 is as an infinity symbol turned on its side, which fits in line really quite nicely.
Have I ever objected to a kind request?

(H DUNAMIS MEGALH) – the title so blasphemously claimed by Simon Magus,* is 800 = KURIOS.

Light, though really threefold, has traditionally also a sevenfold nature. The emanations of the Divine Essence are figured in the Apocalypse as Seven Lamps, which are the Seven Spirits of God, and the seven stars which are the Angels of the Seven Churches. In the scheme of geometric representation, the first emanation from, or manifestation of, the Absolute, in the series we are now considering, is figured as a Cube developed from an original point, which is one of its angles, and this is portrayed in its visible aspect of symmetry as a Hexagon with six internal lines radiating from the centre.Theoretically there is a seventh radius but never more than six are visible because the seventh approaches the eye and unites the central visible point with the eighth point lying exactly behind it.
The Six outward points, with their connecting lines, represent the Kosmos, or manifestation of the Divine Source, the revelation of God to man.But the eighth or invisible original is required to complete the figure of the cube, which is only apprehended by the higher reason.The Six again may be held to represent the periods of Creation and the seventh point, the Sabbath rest of God.

* Simon Magus as SIMWN O MAGOS has the number of the Omnipotence – H AUTODUNAMIS, which follows logically from his self-chosen title of H DUNAMIS MEGALH = 800 = KURIOS. ELUMAS presents the number 676, a very favourite cabalistic number, being the square of the tetragrammaton IHVH or 26, and as O ELUMAS he is a double LOGOS being 2 × 373 or 746, the Gnostic CARAGMA. SKEUAS – another of these magicians (Sceva in our translation) is probably only a Greek nickname – the Reverend ‘Make-up’.
 
erickcid said:
Perfection: Very well. We are going in circles.
Well, I'm just trying to figure out why your phrase is so important as to call it proof for the existance of god. Where is the miracle when probability theory predicts stuff like this can occur?
 
Perfection: You want this to mean nothing, so for you it will. For me, I find it interesting. Again, the statement Proof for a civ player or some such, was intended tongue and cheek as jerusalem does appear in the game. Your mileage may vary.
 
@Garbarsardar.jr: I don't know what you're trying to prove :) The Greek language is a mathematical language, as you know, and each word is a synthesis of a specific meaning; I know this :lol: In which side are you?
 
perfection: also I might add that I know God. I have a relationship with God, and have come to understand it. It is intertwined throughout our existence. Jerusalem was something noticed earlier in the day, and here was a nice place to share it. Yes, you can do this kind of thing with most anything, but if you accepted what has already been shared you would know why. This leads to a discussion that I am unwilling to have right now, but otherwise I am good to go for a period more.
 
King Alexander: I think he is being humorous/sarcastic/tongue-in-cheek, but it makes it interesting. Lets see this as all of us being and talking rather than sides, but if you are keeping score, I think he is with you.
 
Quentin:

Can you name me even one person who would defy an all powerful God thing that could do anything without so much as a thought?

I would, if I wouldn't be convinienced that I'm incapable of living the right life.
The problem is that we want to be our own god. We don't want to accept any authority above us. We want to be the highest authority in our life ourselves. We want nobody else to tell us what to do. And if we fail, we want to fix things by ourselves. It doesn't matter if God is good or evil. We want to be our own god.

Why should God refuse to make Himself known if He is as believers claim He is?

Well, God has made himself known several times.
But people don't accept it. Pherhaps for 10 years people believe so, and after 10 years the new generation says that their parents never saw God made himself known.

Besides that, I still stand on my point. It's all about the message. We are broken, we are not what we were designed to be. We cannot fix ourselves, only God can. The message is: we cannot be our own 'god', we will fail.
That's true, either if God does exist or not.

If it truly is about the message why do non-believers supposedly go to Hell for denying Him?

If we are broken, and heaven (= the new earth) is perfect, we cannot enter the new earth. (how could broken be combined with perfect? )
God wants us to be remade, but he won't force his 'patch' upon us.
We must want to be remade. And for that reason we must admit that we are broken.

Only if we are broken and admit that he can remake us, he will remake us.
That's a very 'technicall' explanation.

The better explanation is that God wants to be with us forever. But if we don't want to be with God forever, if we don't love him, he won't force us to live with him forever. It's not a forced mariage.
Hell is just living in the absence of God.

Like hell would be living in the absence of my wife, for me.

There really are times when the concept of a forgiving and almighty God makes no sense.

That's because you can't / don't want to see the entire concept.
But I agree, sometimes it's hard. And I don't know all the answers.
But I'm sorry to tell you that the truth is far more complicated than your questions imply. You try too much to put your (our) post-modern wester cultural situation on God, and on what the truth should be like.

King Alexander

Another proof of the arrogance believers have: "(the christian) God"? Are you sure that all the other "Gods" are wrong?

There are 3 options:
1. there are no gods
2. there is one god, all other gods are false
3. it doesn't matter in which god you believe

If option 1 or 3 would be true my words would be arrogant indeed.
It would be as if I would say that my wife is beautifull and all other women are ugly.

If option2 would be true my words are simply the truth. As in there is one queen in The Netherlands, and that's queen Beatrix. There are no other queens in The Netherlands.
Am I arrogant for claiming that there is no queen but queen beatrix? (in The Netherlands)

I can see from your point of view that I'm arrogant.
But from my point of view, I simply state what I believe in.
It's not as if I want everybody to be wrong, I just believe that everybody is wrong.

If you have seen a brick wall on the road and you see several cars speeding with 150mph into the direction of the wall and you know there's one way to get around the wall. Wouldn't you tell the drivers there is a wall? And there's one way to get around it?

Pherhaps the drivers would tell you: "There is no wall, you're insane" or "Why do you think that your way around is the only way around"
It's not as if I don't want there to be another way. And if I want all others to drive against the brick wall. It's just that I'm afraid that that's what will happen. It has nothing *nothing* to do with arrogance. It's not a game about football teams in which I say that my team is better.

It's a matter of living and death in my opinion, and I hope that all you guys will live.

Have you read religion books from foreing religions?

yes.

Who proved that JC was the son of God? JC did that for himself? What a proof!!! I can claim that for myself, you know.

That's what I mean. Jesus performed miracles, but people still did not believe.
Remember that the Jewish people Jesus performed miracles for had another background than you did. They were expecting a Messiah. They saw the miracles. They saw Jesus' claim to be the Messiah. And they still did not believe so.

You are right, why should they believe so if He said so?
And that's why they didn't. I don't say they had to believe him. But you shouldn't claim that if miracles would be done or God would speak loud out, they would believe. People won't.

I have been into discussions about something that was provable, and people still claimed things weren't true after sawing the proof.
People tent to stick to their opinion, no matter what. For sure if it's about things like the sence of life. Only if one would be really open minded, proof would work. But I don't believe that someone is really open minded. Sure some are more open minded than others. But in the end nobody is open minded.

But of course! How convenient for the believers to say that over and over again...

I don't try to be convinient.
I try to explain why I think that God doesn't come with more miracles and write His name into the sky. It's convinient to me. I know that nothing I say would be convinient to you. Like most obviously noting you say would be convinient to me. That's why we have this debate.
I can see your point for not believing in god. I wonder if you can see my point for believing in God as well. That would be something.

That's right: God did a bad job with people; he's not perfect.

How would you have done it?
Do you have the complete overview of the implications of creating humans?
Do you know the concquences for if he would have done it different?
Do you understand the choises he made, and for what reasons he did so?

I think that God created perfect humans. And perfect implies: self thinking.
Without that we would have been animals. Perfect animals.

Are you suggesting that he should eliminate us all and begin from scratch? How humanitarian.

Well, I would most obviously destroy my own creation if it would raise against me. But God didn't, he didn't eliminate us, he will fix us.
That's not from scratch.

Maybe he'll admit his mistakes in a confession type...

Did you ever admit your mistakes to God?
Or are you perfect?

He cannot be my God, because he's powerless.

Why? Because he doesn't do what you would do if you were him?
So in fact you claim to be a better god. That's the point, we humans claim that we are better than god, while we have no clue about all the facts of this universe nor do we know the full concequences of decisions.

And eventhough we lack so much information and inteligence, we still claim we could have done a better job. We want to be god ourselves, and we don't accept God to be our God.

I never ask him to show himself to me. I don't want to be a God's servant/slave; I'm a person with free will.

Serving God made me free.
But if you don't want to you don't have to.

Some dope addicts started using dope because they claimed to be free to do so.
Who says that you are free? Your opinion is what the opinion of the majority of the western world is. Your arguments are just the arguments the majority of the western world gives. If you would have lived in the middle ages you most obviously would have been a roman catholic with the masses.

I'm sorry, I can't see why you are free.
but if you think you're free and you're happy with that, than I'm happy for you. I wish you the very best, and I hope all your wishes come true.

I hope there is no wall and you won't ride against the wall and die.
But I'm afraid there is a wall, and there's only one way to avoid it. Not because I'm arrogant, but because I hope you'll take that road and live.

anybody going to reply to my logical argumentation why there must be a *something* or do I have to post it again?
 
@Garbarsardar.jr: I don't know what you're trying to prove The Greek language is a mathematical language, as you know, and each word is a synthesis of a specific meaning; I know this In which side are you?
I'm in nobody's side because nobody is on my side. We, the Ents, have watched the wars of Elves, Men Orcs and Trolls for a long time....sorry I don't now how that sprang to my mind right now... :blush:
 
God wants us to be remade, but he won't force his 'patch' upon us.

So it's like you have vanilla CIV and you don't apply the 1.29f because it is a temporary solution, and what's the point since CIV4 will solve everything?
Hmmmm....right.
 
Perfection said:
So wait, Garbarsardar, are you saying, that I am Jesus? :confused:

That's all the reason you need to launch your political career! :)
 
CyberShy said:
anybody going to reply to my logical argumentation why there must be a *something* or do I have to post it again?

@Cyber:
It did not strike me as anything more than the usual self-motivational religious 'scientific' post.
So why should I think you have a god hidden in there based on that?

You also keep making the 'my god saved me, but you guys are in trouble' statements.

Now, am I meant to see this as anything other than by-products of your imagination?

Well...
I deny all gods - They were made up by primitive humans without real answers.

If not, show me proof - Let's hear it.

Prove me wrong, disprove my claims.

PS
No bible stuff please, that is just words written as fan-fiction.
 
@Garbarsardar.jr: Ok, I admit it; I was confused and I wanted a straight answer. Of course you don't have to be with either side :)

CyberShy said:
King Alexander
If option2 would be true my words are simply the truth.
You said it yourself: "If" option2.... Look, it doesn't concern me if there is one or many Gods. I just try find my questions through science/research and not accept what I read in the Bible(a questionable book, with all respect).
CyberShy said:
As in there is one queen in The Netherlands, and that's queen Beatrix. There are no other queens in The Netherlands.
Am I arrogant for claiming that there is no queen but queen beatrix? (in The Netherlands)
I can't understand why you give an example with a REAL person to prove that God(something unproved) exists.
CyberShy said:
I just believe that everybody is wrong.
Except from your fellow religionists, of course.
CyberShy said:
That's what I mean. Jesus performed miracles, but people still did not believe.
Remember that the Jewish people Jesus performed miracles for had another background than you did. They were expecting a Messiah. They saw the miracles. They saw Jesus' claim to be the Messiah. And they still did not believe so.
Explanation: they didn't want "someone" to take their authority away. Anyway, from what I remember Jesus NEVER performed his miracles in front of his "opposition"; he performed miracles in front of the people who were desperate in search of a better life and who were willing to believe him. If he cared to be believed by all, he should perform miracles in front of his opposition.
CyberShy said:
I have been into discussions about something that was provable, and people still claimed things weren't true after sawing the proof.
Only scientific proof is the only one proof that is acceptable. All the other kind of "proofs" belong to the "supernatural".
CyberShy said:
But I don't believe that someone is really open minded. Sure some are more open minded than others. But in the end nobody is open minded.
I can say to you that I'm more open minded than you imagine, because I don't believe in Gods; Therefore, I can accept things more easily than religionists(I could even agree that a God does exist, if it was proved scientifically).
CyberShy said:
I can see your point for not believing in god. I wonder if you can see my point for believing in God as well. That would be something.
Your point is not based in scientific facts nor has been proved by any scientist at the age Jesus came. I respect your right to believe in anything you want, though.
 
There are 3 options:
1. there are no gods
2. there is one god, all other gods are false
3. it doesn't matter in which god you believe
If option 1 or 3 would be true my words would be arrogant indeed.
It would be as if I would say that my wife is beautifull and all other women are ugly.
If option2 would be true my words are simply the truth. As in there is one queen in The Netherlands, and that's queen Beatrix. There are no other queens in The Netherlands.
Am I arrogant for claiming that there is no queen but queen beatrix? (in The Netherlands)
I can see from your point of view that I'm arrogant.
But from my point of view, I simply state what I believe in.
It's not as if I want everybody to be wrong, I just believe that everybody is wrong

What a nice argumentative structure!
Let me see how it would apply (as any good argument) to another topic:
1. there are no radioactive monkeys
2. there is one radioactive monkey, all other radioactive monkeys are false
3. it doesn't matter in which radioactive monkey you believe
If option 1 or 3 would be true my words would be arrogant indeed.
It would be as if I would say that my wife is beautifull and all other women are ugly.
If option2 would be true my words are simply the truth. As in there is one queen in The Netherlands, and that's queen Beatrix. There are no other queens in The Netherlands.
Am I arrogant for claiming that there is no queen but queen beatrix? (in The Netherlands)
I can see from your point of view that I'm arrogant.
But from my point of view, I simply state what I believe in.
It's not as if I want everybody to be wrong, I just believe that everybody is wrong
AND THAT PROVES THE EXISTENCE OF RADIOACTIVE MONKEYS BEYOND ALL DOUBT.
 
Wow Garbarsardar, you're really really really really really really really really missing the point.

That argumental structure wasn't made to prove the existance of God.
It was made to see if my opinion has anything to do with arrogance.
Amazing how people can't even follow a normal debate :D:D

It did not strike me as anything more than the usual self-motivational religious 'scientific' post.
So why should I think you have a god hidden in there based on that?

How simplistic to give such a reply.
If it didn't strike you, why don't you come with counter arguments against the arguments I gave? What you do is not debating, it's morely something like: "Whatever you say I'll disagree, and I won't explain why"

If not, show me proof - Let's hear it.

I gave proof, but you just ignore it, or fail to counter it.

You said it yourself: "If" option2

Exactly, we both talk from different positions, I believe option 2 is true, you believe 1 or 3 is true. From your point of view I'm arrogant. I just try to explain why it's not arrogance that makes me say that.

I can't understand why you give an example with a REAL person to prove that God(something unproved) exists.

Oh my, you don't get the point either.
I'm not trying to prove the existance of God.
I try to show how things are arrogant or not.
You really didn't see that?

from what I remember Jesus NEVER performed his miracles in front of his "opposition"

:D:D
ok, I see....... I'm talking with someone who really has no clue about what he's talking about. Doesn't matter, but please if you have no clue, don't act if you have one.

Only scientific proof is the only one proof that is acceptable. All the other kind of "proofs" belong to the "supernatural".

Ask your local hospital, they'll tell you that miracles do happen.
Or go to Africa, they'll tell you that miracles do happen.
Besides that, what's scientific proof? Something that was scientific true 50 years ago might be dated today. Something that might be scientific true today could very well be laughable in 50 years.

Don't offer your soul to science my friend.
Science is a very good thing, and we should study it and we should improve it, and we should accept it. But now you sound as if science is the answer to everything.
Science as a religion....... amazing.

I can say to you that I'm more open minded than you imagine, because I don't believe in Gods; Therefore, I can accept things more easily than religionists

:D:D:D
That's funny.
You really do believe that you're more open minded then christians are.
Oh well, pherhaps you are, pherhaps you're not. I can't say that.
But it's really awesome that you can't see that being an 'atheist' (agnost?) doesn't mean you're more open minded.
You obviously won't see either that you're having your own religion, in which you're god. Of course you don't name yourself god, but in fact that's how it is.

You are in charge of your life, and nobody should interfere with your business.

Well, since that's your view in life, accepting God would destroy everything you believe in. You are no different than me.
Oh well, the difference is that I know that we are the same, while you truely believe that you're the smarter more scientific open-minded one.

Yeah yeah, that's how they have burned Galileo in the middle ages........ :D:D
Because in those days the roman catholics believed they knew everything and all the rest were idiots.

Besides that, why did you ignore so much of my arguments?

And, is anybody going to reply on my "There must be something" argument, the first post I made?
 
I already did - But since I gave you a straight demand for some proof, you are avoiding me.
 
Amazing how people can't even follow a normal debate
How simplistic to give such a reply
Oh my, you don't get the point either
I'm talking with someone who really has no clue about what he's talking about
Science as a religion....... amazing.

Now that you have proven that you are not arrogant in such an eloquent,polite, and witty manner, could you please enlighten us ignorants with
A TINY SHRED OF PROOF (apart from
go to Africa, they'll tell you that miracles do happen
)

It's not as if I want everybody to be wrong, I just believe that everybody is wrong
There is a name for that condition, and I can assure you that there is also a cure, It is called paranoid delusion, and it can be treated with a variety of pharmaceutical products. I am very sorry for my previous post, sincs I didn't realise you are ill.
you can find help here:http://www.healthyplace.com/Communities/Thought_Disorders/schizoaffective/madness/paranoia.asp
or here:http://www.ehendrick.org/healthy/001021.htm

Good luck. :)
 
Grabarsardar is correct.

Personal or anecdotal statements do not count towards the argument, or convincing anyone.

Religious folk trying to sound academic and superior by stating;
'only god's people are in the know' will not buy any mileage here.
 
A question for you whom believe God does not exist. Does not the fact that you exist give greater sense that so does God? Does not our existence create a greater positive sentiment than negative? Is your lack of belief rooted in the condition of Life on Earth, and can not you justify the sense of why things may be the way they are? Consider the game we all play, Civilization 3. In said game you are God like in your power and ability. If you imagine Life itself and existence to God in a similar fashion to yourself when you are in a comparable position; how do you act? Man being created in the likeness and image of God allows us to understand God more reasonably by understanding ourselves. If you press your disbelief on the fact that evil exists, and that is not what God is presented as, then you only create for yourself ignorance. God's character can be seen in the bible and other scripture, and it is clear that he is not all Good by most definitons. If you understand for a moment that God can be and is Evil as well, does that help you to understand? Also, you read works of fiction and play fictional games. Even if you do not believe does not reading spiritual works such as the bible further understanding? I think it would be rewarding. In reference to itself God says I Am what I Am. Religious people imagine God as a purely Good being, and as such offer little understanding for evils that are present. This type of presentation is also ignorant, and can be off putting to those whom do not see the world through their eyes.
 
I see the invention of god as an example of man's arrogance to represent himself, or his image as the creator of all the cosmos.

It is such a typical medieval idea - Grounded in fancy and almost total ignorance.
But cynically backed by educated clergy to dupe the mindless peasants.
Now the same thing goes on, albeit the peasants are better educated (sometimes) but the superstitions are still around.

The same people, who imprisoned astronomers, are the same people who held that god was a real being who held sway over all.
And of course, he was a white, bearded figure, same as this 'jesus' being an Aryan, blue-eyed figure.

Humans cannot take alien concepts; like that there is no god - Just we humans and our ideas.

Now do you see my meaning?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom