Prove God exists and win 1,000,000!!!!!

[Vietcong]

well not realy, im too poor for that..

but yea, my point is u Cant prove it!

 

[Perfection]

I'll back it up with real money.

If anyone can prove god does exist (and not by an abnormal definition of god), I will send them $5.00.

 

[Yom]

I'll back it up with real money.

If anyone can prove god does exist (and not by an abnormal definition of god), I will send them $5.00.

You have to define what a "normal definition of God" would be, first, though.

 

[Vietcong]

hay, acaly i can send 15, so it will be 20$!!!
woot!!!!!
yea well i think thats crap, u cant prove good exist, but u cant disprove it eather.. ur much more likely to prove evoltuion then that, plus evoltuion has evadince.

 

[Riesstiu IV]

I took a picture of him earlier today...



Pay up!

 

[elfangor801]

I'm thinking this thread isn't going to get very far...

 

[Dida]

I'm thinking this thread isn't going to get very far...

True, we are still far, far from proving anything about God yet. Oh well, we might be close to proving that he doesn't exist.

 

[Shadylookin]

http://forums.civfanatics.com/member.php?u=6464

my $20 please

 

[Birdjaguar]

I could do that, but then to get my money I'd have to reveal secret information about myself and then you'd probably come and kill me to get it back.

EDIT: Damn, Shadylookin took the prize.

 

[Perfection]

You have to define what a "normal definition of God" would be, first, though.

No, I don't. I'll just take what your definition is and see if I consider it a normal definition. For example all naturalistic panthiestic definitions go straight out the window, because I don't consider it normal.

I took a picture of him earlier today...



Pay up!

Ummm, that's just Santa

I'm thinking this thread isn't going to get very far...

I won't but I'll have fun while it lasts.

 

[general_kill]

creationism and evolution can cooexist guys, dont be so closed minded. Let just say that god created all matter, and we evolved from there.

 

[Perfection]

http://forums.civfanatics.com/member.php?u=6464

my $20 please

I define that as an abnormal definition, no money for you!

I could do that, but then to get my money I'd have to reveal secret information about myself and then you'd probably come and kill me to get it back.

Nah, I'd just send a mail bomb, it would cost too much in fuel for me to go over there.

 

[Birdjaguar]

I'll back it up with real money.

If anyone can prove god does exist (and not by an abnormal definition of god), I will send them $5.00.

The problem isn't a "normal definition of god" but what constitutes proof.

 

[Perfection]

creationism and evolution can cooexist guys, dont be so closed minded. Let just say that god created all matter, and we evolved from there.

It can logically coexist, but the question is should it? I don't think so.

 

[FriendlyFire]

Nothing comes from Nothing

Yet Big bang theory has the creation of the entire universe in a single instant.
So the universe had to come from something.

basicly laws of relativity.
Therefore something must had "created" the big bang

On the other hand
laws of Quatumn Physics state the all possibilities can / must be exhausted.

i.e : The probability of LIFE is 1^20 Million.
-In relativity its called law of specified complexity. which says life cannot come from non-life. Life (specified complxity) can only come from another from of life.

In Quatumn Physics Since all things are possible and since there are inf is used into the equation. All possible instance must exist then Life can come from non-Life.

String Theory The violation of specified complexity is possible only in inf small strings which means that on and only on this level can it be possible but it has no effect on the Quatumn Physics scale which has no effect on the Relativity scale which has ...... etc etc


Simple ?

When science can make a single all binding law for life itself then you will have Proof of God exsistence / non-exsistence.

 

[Perfection]

The problem isn't a "normal definition of god" but what constitutes proof.

Anything that convinces me.

 

[snipelfritz]

creationism and evolution can cooexist guys, dont be so closed minded. Let just say that god created all matter, and we evolved from there.

Or God gave it a poke here and there. I agree the two theories can be/are both correct.

Shadylookin hats off to you

Ummm, that's just Santa

Santa is God. Hey, there's an idea for a religion, Santaism.
*walks off to build "The Shrine of Kringle"*

 

[Perfection]

Nothing comes from Nothing

Got proof? And what about virtual particles?

Yet Big bang theory has the creation of the entire universe in a single instant.
So the universe had to come from something.

There are some varieities of big bang theory that don't say the universe was "creatyed" in that instant

basicly laws of relativity.
Therefore something must had "created" the big bang

see previous crap, oh and who says this must be god? And what created god?

On the other hand
laws of Quatumn Physics state the all possibilities can / must be exhausted.

Where?

i.e : The probability of LIFE is 1^20 Million.

Zuh?

-In relativity its called law of specified complexity. which says life cannot come from non-life. Life (specified complxity) can only come from another from of life.

There isn't a law like that (except some crappy IDTers, but they don't count)

In Quatumn Physics Since all things are possible and since there are inf is used into the equation. All possible instance must exist then Life can come from non-Life.

So?

String Theory The violation of specified complexity is possible only in inf small strings which means that on and only on this level can it be possible but it has no effect on the Quatumn Physics scale which has no effect on the Relativity scale which has ...... etc etc

So....

When science can make a single all binding law for life itself then you will have Proof of God exsistence / non-exsistence.

Go make that


In conclusion, no money.

 

[Perfection]

Or God gave it a poke here and there. I agree the two theories can be/are both correct.

Prove that god exists then

Santa is God. Hey, there's an idea for a religion, Santaism.
*walks off to build "The Shrine of Kringle"*

Good luck with that...

 

[Taliesin]

Well, I have much more proof that God exists than that any of you exist, really. You exist, presumably, if you're reading this. Hence, given that God is more likely to exist, there is a more or less asymptotic likelihood of God existing. That's as close as we'll get.

I win.

PS If you take issue with my leap from "more proof" to "more likely", then we can have a nice discussion about how Pyrrhonian scepticism would have us not bother with a courts system.