Sephiroth
One Winged Angel
I got it to work. i had graphics turned all the way down...............


I don't know, It is interesting to torture the poor computer though, so I might test it, but it would be hard to get all of the land filled up, but I don't really know since I almost never use the dual size. They might just stick you on the closest civs land and have you declare war if you want to move, I know that's how it is when you use the worldbuilder.Kalleyao said:OK, new question. If I have require complete kills and always peace, Duel and max amount of AIs. Lets say I skip the first turn. The AI settle the whole map so the whole map is filled with its culture after the first turn, where will my settler and warrior go?
I have to say civ 4 is not very good.....
seezachswim said:Don't know if this belongs in this section or not, but anyways, how do you put text in a spoiler tag? I can't seem to find a button for it.
Cloud Strife said:I have to say civ 4 is not very good.....
I think I will stick to civ3![]()
yea but the game is so slow.a4phantom said:A common sentiment. Civ4 grows on you though, it is better in a lot of ways, specifically diplomacy/religion and unit counters/promos.

Cloud Strife said:yea but the game is so slow.![]()
and not very user friendly![]()
Nah I just deleted it and took it back for my money. it was a waste of timea4phantom said:Have you patched it? Until the first or second patch the game was a horrible RAM hog and would often shut down on a modern computer. At least by 1.51 that was solved. It still (on a new computer, v1.61) sometimes fails to load on the first try.
As for user-friendly, I must agree that a lot of simple formulas in Civ3 (which were holdovers from Civs1+2) were replaced with invisible algorithims. City maintainance for example. I wouldn't go back to Civ3, but I can't say I'm not nostalgic for the things Civ3 did better.

Yes, but no where near as much as they should.M@ni@c said:Does the AI use missionaries?