I tend to always play as The Top Guy (or otherwise I wouldn't HAVE vassals to begin with), so it's kinda redundant in my playing style.
Montreal Biodome
Thanks, now gonna test it, lol.
There's a very long list of projects yet planned and its going to be interesting to see how many can get implemented. Might become its own new game before then.
Can you elaborate plz?
I agree that there is this consistency issue but I'm strongly thinking it should go the other way and we work towards a more volumetric resources system.
Honestly it's currently too many plans to label them all in one place and such a project would be yet another on the heap of projects.
Dude, sorry to remind you, but "making the content outline for your plan" is like 99% of "actually fulfilling that plan", ya know.
. I would expect it to be increased to 8. Or is it not working because the tile is already benefiting from Agricultural I giving the Fruit Gathering Camp +1, so it won't give it the +1 on plots with 7 because the base yield is technically only 6? Sorry that sentence was confusing.)/Forest tile with Apples (+2) and a Fruit Gathering Camp (+1,+1 from Agricultural I). This question might be too specific for this thread, idk.
You could always go read the Ideas Project thread. Or the posts I made in the Nomadic Start project threads. Perhaps take note of all the line items on the Unit Review documents. Or perhaps the Leaders as Units project. Maybe take note of the Combat Mod posts, particularly the Equipment section. Maybe take a look at the Multimaps, or the Volumetric Resources, the Electricity property project, Radiation property, Biospheric regions, Mortal Leaders, plans to expand on Size Matters for hunting and casualties, emotional statuses for units, Outbreaks and Afflictions, expanded Leader flavors, discussions on AI, I actually have outlined everything and am usually ignored when I've asked for help with the things I'm wanting to get done. I've also been helped when I'm on a project so that's not so bad. My point is that there is so much history in this forum it's hard to condense it all. I am likely the only person here who has literally read every single post in this C2C forum section and its all still swirling around in the vague plan of what's to come when I finally can break free from working every awake hour. My retirement will be legendary.
This was an interesting ability that came from legacy stuff long before I worked on the leader tags that I had an interesting time playing a bit with as a sub-effect for some highly specialized leader traits. The idea is basically that it makes some plots even more powerful if you can get them to a particular point of power to begin with so it pushes you sometimes to make decisions to get a better deal but perhaps way less balanced, therefore making an even more dedicated 'strategic path' of working hard with a particular yield and then seeing how you can convert that yield to getting more of the rest of them in other less direct ways.
which turned into 7 because of one part of Agricultural, but then the part of Agricultural that turns 7s into 8s didn't do anything, and I was wondering if that's because of the order the modifiers of the trait are applied in, and if it only checks what modifiers should be applied when the tile itself changes, so it didn't see the 7 food there.I'm not sure it HAD to "see" it, though, which is my point. I see a perfect reason to NOT expect it to, just as likely as otherwise. Both versions make sense.Also I think @Somebody613 slightly misunderstood my question, I had a tile with 6
It's a check to qualify for a set +1 bonus. It does not keep getting more with each pt thereafter.Yeah, I figured that in the early eras, food is probably worth its weight in gold, because that's how it was in the real world. The four OG starting points for humanity were all river valleys for a reason, and it's why Europe got so powerful, because of food.
Also I think @Somebody613 slightly misunderstood my question, I had a tile with 6
I think he means that there are two factors there, and he expected the second one to kick in after the first one already did - which may or may not make sense.
