Race Baiting 101.....

MobBoss

Off-Topic Overlord
Joined
Oct 28, 2005
Messages
46,853
Location
In Perpetual Motion
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080426/D909P8SG0.html

NEW YORK (AP) - Hundreds of angry people marched through Harlem on Saturday after the Rev. Al Sharpton promised to "close this city down" to protest the acquittals of three police detectives in the 50-shot barrage that killed a groom on his wedding day and wounded two friends.

"We strategically know how to stop the city so people stand still and realize that you do not have the right to shoot down unarmed, innocent civilians," Sharpton told an overflow crowd of several hundred people at his National Action Network office in the historically black Manhattan neighborhood. "This city is going to deal with the blood of Sean Bell."

Sharpton was joined by the family of 23-year-old Sean Bell - a black man - and a friend of Bell who was wounded in the 2006 shooting outside a Queens strip club. Two of the three officers charged were also black.

The rally at Sharpton's office was followed by a 20-block march down Malcolm X Boulevard and then across 125th Street, Harlem's main business thoroughfare, where some bystanders yelled out "Kill the police!"

Fifty of the marchers carried white placards bearing big black numbers for each of the police bullets fired at Bell and his friends.

Sharpton urged people to return for a meeting this coming week "to plan the day that we will close this city down" with the kind of "massive civil disobedience" once led by Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.

"They never accused Sean Bell of doing anything. Then why is he dead?" Sharpton asked, his voice roaring with anger. Authorities "have shown now that they will not hold police accountable. Well, guess what? If you won't, we will!"

"Shut it down! Shut it down!" the crowd chanted, standing up and applauding wildly.

Sharpton didn't say exactly how they would protest the acquittals of the officers who fired the 50 shots. He said Bell's supporters could demonstrate all over the city, from Wall Street to the home of Justice Arthur Cooperman, who on Friday acquitted the three detectives after a nonjury trial.

Sitting behind Sharpton as he spoke were Bell's parents, his sister and Nicole Paultre Bell, who took her fiance's name after his death.

"The justice system let me down," Paultre Bell told the crowd in a soft voice. "April 25, 2008: They killed Sean all over again. That's what it felt like to us."

It was her first public comment since she stormed out of a courtroom Friday after the NYPD detectives were cleared in Bell's killing as he left his bachelor party.

One of Bell's companions, Joseph Guzman, also spoke briefly on Saturday, saying: "We've got a long fight."

Its almost like Tawanya Bradley all over again. Rev. AL stirring the pot, stirring the pot.

So, do you agree with what Big Al is doing here? Or is he merely pandering to the black crowd to grab the limelight....again?

Additionally, arent there laws for 'inciting a riot' there in New York? Why the hell dont they arrest Sharpton for that?
 
Funny, but I don't see a single reference to race in that article. Maybe the race baiter is not who the OP claims it to be.
 
Funny, but I don't see a single reference to race in that article. Maybe the race baiter is not who the OP claims it to be.
"We strategically know how to stop the city so people stand still and realize that you do not have the right to shoot down unarmed, innocent civilians," Sharpton told an overflow crowd of several hundred people at his National Action Network office in the historically black Manhattan neighborhood. "This city is going to deal with the blood of Sean Bell."

Sharpton was joined by the family of 23-year-old Sean Bell - a black man - and a friend of Bell who was wounded in the 2006 shooting outside a Queens strip club. Two of the three officers charged were also black.

The article certainly mentions race. Draw your own opinions as to whether that's what Sharpton is protesting.
 
I agree with Perfection, it's probably both. Although honestly, I'm usually for anyone that chants; "Kill the police!"

Ainwood's bolding seems to indicate that Sharpton didn't say a thing himself about race, it's the author of the article bringing that up. But from what I know about Sharpton - which admittedly, is not much - he seems to think he's the new Martin Luther King, so this could well be a racial thing.

I also know little about this trial, or what Bell is supposed to have done to warrant being shot like that, but I certainly don't see any possible reason to hit the car with 50 shots. It's not like there were 10 heavily armed and armoured men in there or anything. Unless there's one hell of an extenuating circumstance, there is excuse for that bs.
 
So the policemen where black themselves? Hardly a race crime, a police brutality maybe, but I don't know all the circumstances.
 
Can we get some back history on this? I mean, is this a situation like Amadu Dialu or whatever his name was where the cops were shooting at him, and the bullets were ricocheting back at them so they thought they were being shot back at so they kept shooting?

I'm very unfamiliar with this.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Bell#Shooting_incident

The OTHER back history is that this is a predictiably sensitive area that comes to view practically everything as someone elses fault, and not theirs. Let's just say Al sharpton holds a lot of weight in the area. Also, bbc has pictures.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/7367761.stm

I think this is a situation that can be interpreted either way. The cops may have been at fault, and they may have been doing their job and they did nothing that anyone else wouldn't have done at the time. And it may have been 'racist', and it may have been not. It's just a matter of what the individual wants to believe.
 
Apparently the person killed was drunk and tried to run over an undercover cop with his car. That is the story coming from the cops anyway.

Al Sharpton is one of the most pathetic people this country has. He is like second sting highschool football player living in the glory days of 40 years ago.
 
Apparently the person killed was drunk and tried to run over an undercover cop with his car. That is the story coming from the cops anyway.

Well according to witnesses, the detectives didn't identify themselves, or didn't clearly. If the case had involved the driver trying to hit a cop and being shot, that'd be one thing, but 50 shots were fired from 3 cops, which meant one of them had time to reload.

Al Sharpton is one of the most pathetic people this country has. He is like second sting highschool football player living in the glory days of 40 years ago.

A very apt description.
 
Can we get some back history on this? I mean, is this a situation like Amadu Dialu or whatever his name was where the cops were shooting at him, and the bullets were ricocheting back at them so they thought they were being shot back at so they kept shooting?

I'm very unfamiliar with this.

Police officers undercover inside the club said the thought they heard someone say "go get my gun". So they followed them out to their car and after Bell and his friends got in the undercover officers aimed and got ready to fire, at which point Bell attempted to drive off and accidentally hit an officer(small injuries). Then the officers say that they saw a man reach for a gun and fired. Some fired entire mags, reloaded and kept firing.

That's my understanding.
 
Yeah, I misread one of the news stories. It was a bachalor party, which changes things.

Still, I don't think that the amount of force was justified.
In my opinion, the force was indeed unjustified. However, after reading about the incident when it first happened, I thought the victim basically did everything wrong he possibly could have. Add to that very jumpy police and the result is what happened.
 
Back
Top Bottom