Why people like the follow: Star Trek, Degrassi, The OC, Coronation Street, Medium, etc? It is the same boring junk; repeated over and over, weak after weak. Within 5 minutes of the intro, you can predict the ending. The characters are not 1-D -- they are 0-D, like mathematical points. True, there are other shows like those, but these spring in my mind first.
======================
Also, did any one catch the latest
CSI: Miami? It was about a bunch of gamers decided to play out the game in real life, to the T. Included was a head gamer who play 80 hours straight and died, the female gamer who just wants to be accepted and the evil game developers -- who set up the whole affair to generate more sales. I bet the deleted scenes included a "Thomas Jackson", a tireless prusier trying to bring to justice the vile creatures to the fullest extent of his law firm; and how video games also promote gay love, evolution and terrorism.
Best line: "Hey! I ain't no gamer!"
I hate to find if the CSI teams take on people enjoying world domination simulations and acting upon it...
==================
Speaking of Medium, during a book fair at my college, I was browsing around when I encounter this real gem.
We Are Eternal: What the Spirits Tell Me About Life After Death written Robert Brown, a "medium's medium" who "read" for such luminaries as John Edwards (of
Crossing Over fame), the late Princess Diana, and members of the Royal Family of India.
Here a
review, with this wonderfully hilariously section (unintentional, I hope):
Institutional religions are not the only naysayers. Psychic phenomenon are likewise rejected by the two dominant intellectualisms of the Western Grain, scientific method and the rationalist view of truth founded on the principle of methodical doubt.
Let's take the first. Certainly psychic phenomenon are "unscientific", based on the term's self-definition. But in the unsolved mystery department the sciences have plenty of skeletons in their own closet. Cosmologists haven't a clue what makes up the 75 percent of the universe called "dark energy," and are still pretty clueless about an additional 20 percent called "dark matter" (though they are confident they will one day quantify it). Yes, those numbers are correct: All the ordinary matter -- electrons, neutrons, protons, and so on -- that comprise our bodies, the earth, the stars, and the entire universe totals to less than five percent of all that is there. Anthropologists tell us all about the survival of the fittest, but go silent on the issue of why it exists and for what reason it was put here. Physics? What keeps electrons in atoms flying around at specific distances from the nuclei of atoms? It isn't gravity, because their infinitesimal mass would fly off in all directions at the velocities at which they orbit. The answer is: light. The constant exchange of light between the electron and its nucleus keeps the electron bound in its orbit. Give it enough extra energy from outside, e.g. heat, and it bounces up to a higher orbit and ejects a ray of light that is so characteristic in its properties that we have the word "spectrum" to define its energy state. Our eyes interpret this as red-hot versus white-hot.
Going this one further, cosmologists have learned a lot about the properties of the universe but still can't say why it was made in such a way as to proceed from its original state of infinite density to a state of utter nothingness. Physicists have very clear ideas about the various laws that govern the behavior of matter, but haven't a clue why these laws came into being or for what reason. Hence it is arbitrary to single out psychics and mediums and say they're nothing but speculative dreamers or overly gullible.
Your logic is bulletproof, Spock.