Not really. Mansplaining is mostly used to shut down male critics of feminism, yes, but it's a valid term for men who explain (without invitation) the 'male side of the story' to rape victims or women who have suffered at the hands of men.
A rave, the sort of thing you'd post about in this thread, is something you're positive and happy about, as opposed to the random rants thread for things that upset or anger you, or the random thoughts thread for things you're neutral about.
Yeah that really isn't what mansplaining is. It's much less sinister than that.
It is usually meant to mean the tendency for men to try and explain everything to a women (but not other men) because they subconsciously assume they must not know things because they are female.
Most particularly it's the tendency to explain things to a woman that the man would have no basis for knowing or understanding themselves.
"Let me tell you why sexual harassment in the work place is really not that big a deal"
-Said to a woman who was complaining in the break room about the creepy boss that's been making passes at her
A rave, the sort of thing you'd post about in this thread, is something you're positive and happy about, as opposed to the random rants thread for things that upset or anger you, or the random thoughts thread for things you're neutral about.
Most particularly it's the tendency to explain things to a woman that the man would have no basis for knowing or understanding themselves.
"Let me tell you why sexual harassment in the work place is really not that big a deal"
-Said to a woman who was complaining in the break room about the creepy boss that's been making passes at her
Most particularly it's the tendency to explain things to a woman that the man would have no basis for knowing or understanding themselves.
"Let me tell you why sexual harassment in the work place is really not that big a deal"
-Said to a woman who was complaining in the break room about the creepy boss that's been making passes at her
Another example would be a man with minimal scientific knowledge condescendingly explaining, say, something about climate change that he has lots of false misconceptions of, to a woman with a PhD in Atmospheric Science.
I'm still not following your logic. For one thing, the article is largely made of quotes from former redpillers, how can it be womansplaining or femsplaining or whatever if it's largely men doing the talking in the article?
Another example would be a man with minimal scientific knowledge condescendingly explaining, say, something about climate change that he has lots of false misconceptions of, to a woman with a PhD in Atmospheric Science.
I'm still not following your logic. For one thing, the article is largely made of quotes from former redpillers, how can it be womansplaining or femsplaining or whatever if it's largely men doing the talking in the article?
I already gave the exact wavelength of indigo light, so of course it exists. Whether or not our indigo is the same shade as Newton's indigo is a different question.
I already gave the exact wavelength of indigo light, so of course it exists. Whether or not our indigo is the same shade as Newton's indigo is a different question.
Well, at least we agree that the color indigo exists. It's often used in needlepoint and counted cross-stitch for night sky designs - much more subtle than plain black, given the number of shades available.
1. Please, please start a Norway thread! Your video links and comments are scattered all over the place, mostly in the serial threads, and most of those are archived.
2. What was that guy in the green jacket saying?
3. I noticed a shorter video... heckuva place for your shoelaces to stop cooperating!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.