Synobun
Deity
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2006
- Messages
- 24,884
lol, yes!
@rah I do feel what your neighbors did was rather rude. I appreciate that they're thinking about children who may have specific allergies, but I feel their way of going about this seems more about themselves. To me, it feels like what's more important to them is not helping kids, but rather showing you up, sort of saying "You didn't think of this, did you? Ha! We're better people than you are." I feel they could just leave a nice big bowl out at their own place with a sign saying "Gluten free: if you have an allergy, take a handful!" or just made sure they're passing it out. I'd think most parents with children with sensitivities would already have a plan for what to do anyway.
It's rude to ensure that kids with vulnerabilities can go to more than one house on the block while trick-or-treating?

The simple reality is that most people don't know and don't care about sensitivities, and you regularly hear people complain when someone in the neighbourhood asks for consideration at these community events. Simply giving people what they need to accommodate others sounds like a great time-saver and seems to make it more likely that a kid can have fun instead of hoping everyone individually rose to the occasion.
Edit: Put differently, if rah, or whoever else, wasn't directly asked to accommodate a specific sensitivity, would he, or whoever else, have purchased the candy required to accommodate?
Also, the common response to accommodation is, "And who's going to pay for it?" People already skimp on Halloween candy. They're certainly not going to buy special candy for a minority. This solves all the problems. How does it make it about the people who gave the candy? They're the ones losing out in this scenario. Instead of being known as the only people who accommodated vulnerable kids, they'll be known as "one of a few people who accommodated vulnerable kids."