Realpolitik CIV - An Interactive AAR

Status
Not open for further replies.
Spamming workers is not needed, because I'm pretty sure that most of the countryside is improved. However, updated pics would tell us the whole story.

Victory - I agree, RP is mostly to have fun, not to win. I doubt we'll get a victory, since diplo isn't looking too good right now, culture is hopeless this far into the game, the war victories are difficult due to the numerous pacifist parties, we're really behind in techs, etc.
 
Spamming workers is not needed, because I'm pretty sure that most of the countryside is improved. However, updated pics would tell us the whole story.

Victory - I agree, RP is mostly to have fun, not to win. I doubt we'll get a victory, since diplo isn't looking too good right now, culture is hopeless this far into the game, the war victories are difficult due to the numerous pacifist parties, we're really behind in techs, etc.

Plus, I'm pretty sure we'll keep playing until Future Tech or the end of England regardless of who wins. I hate cultural victories.
 
Well its not too late yet. We could still pull out a close victory in something.

Im kind of sure that the roman attack on RY destroyed the countryside, but im not sure. I know that antium has alot of unimproved tiles, and so does amsterdam. Iberia still needs alot of work too, and as we will probably eventually expand somewhere besides europe (we are england after all) we will need workers.
 
Well its not too late yet. We could still pull out a close victory in something.

We could pull off a dirty Nuclear Diplo victory or Nuclear Holocaust Time victory but the later is risky.
 
How would we win diplo if we used nukes? Dont relations go DOWN when you use them?

EDIT: I dont liek time victories.
 
Yeah, but 25 workers? That's ridiculous. I'm sure we have numerous workers floating around different parts of the nation, they can easily go to the cities that need help.

I don't liek time victories either, but I prefer a time victory to no victory, which I liek even less.
 
Diplomation - capping civs and forcing them to vote for us for the win.

As for moving the capital, I said it a few administrations ago, I think, so its no wonder you forgot. Its probably like 150 pages ago. :crazyeyes:
 
How would we win diplo if we used nukes? Dont relations go DOWN when you use them?

Easy. On the turn when you vote for who wins Perma SG, launch nukes at everyone which causes the worlds population to rapidly decrease proportionately to you giving you the majority vote.
 
Isn't there something where you can't win if you can win by just your own votes? I saw that on RB somewhere...
 
Isn't there something where you can't win if you can win by just your own votes? I saw that on RB somewhere...

I believe that only applies to AP, not the UN. Even then, we can simply create a colony at the last minute that'll be forced to vote for us.
 
Yeah, but 25 workers? That's ridiculous. I'm sure we have numerous workers floating around different parts of the nation, they can easily go to the cities that need help.

I don't liek time victories either, but I prefer a time victory to no victory, which I liek even less.

I just said 25 workers since i know we will need a high number of workers. Maybe 10-15?

I would rather not win at all that win by time. And stop typing 'like' as 'liek'! That was a typo!:lol:
 
I just said 25 workers since i know we will need a high number of workers. Maybe 10-15?

Don't forget that building workers stops growth, wastes hammers, etc. Why get more workers if what we have ATM is enough?

And stop typing 'like' as 'liek'! That was a typo!:lol:

Did you liek the joke? :p
 
Don't forget that building workers stops growth, wastes hammers, etc. Why get more workers if what we have ATM is enough?



Did you liek the joke? :p

So we can get it done faster.

Sort of. Still getting used to your jokes. They annoyed the crap out of me when i was president.
 
Its a lot better to save 1000 hammers combined than to get one extra cottage built per turn.

X-post - Not happening. :p :lol:
 
*cue 80s montage of Arya and MN going from political enemies to awesome buddies*

Lmao. Like MN said, not ahppening. Although i wouldnt mind not being enemies. MN seems alot more reasonable than he was then, even though we still differ on ALOT of points, and i dont think he has the backbone to make tough decisions. He has already set the precedent for his term. Basicly let people vote, and do whats most popular. Not very popular in my way of thinking (that doesnt mean i dont like democracy, i love it. I dont like direct democracy though. We elected the people for a reason...).
 
Personally, direct democracy is the best type of democracy. The point of a government is to govern the people, which is best done by letting the people say what is right and wrong.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom