Getting a town vibe from Winston, good work with that analysis. I'd have a look at some of the "where's Winston" crowd, especially Luizeu (whose prodding of Winston seemed OMGUS-y) and Cuthillius (who accused 4 people in one post without really substantiating any of those arguments). It seems probable that one or more of that crowd called on Winston to sound townie without actually having to use any real townie logic beyond that.
Luizeu for now.
Distancing gone wrong? Jarrema had three votes, I had two and Luizeu had none when you made it.
You spent more time on the revenge seeker hypothesis than on the Jarrema/choxorn one, but from what I can tell, it's based mostly on the fact that I voted for Jarrema a few days in a row and choxorn defended me D2. Surely you've got to have more than that, right? Otherwise, this seems like tunneling.
Those connections are still unexplained.
You voted spaceman after he claimed alignment cop.
Because you yourself elaborated more on the "weaker" case.You focused yesterday's arguments on the weaker case I made.
I can agree with you on this one, but I'm not scum and I have no reason to think choxorn is. That's why my vote is on Jarrema.If you flip wolf, there are more leads to follow than if anybody else does.
I'm not saying that I think Jarrema was working with the revenge seekers, I'm saying that Jarrema's the scummiest of the currently living players. Spaceman wanted to demonstrate his ability for the sake of appearing townie. Jarrema wanted to be cleared, so he didn't question it. This situation works even if both are scum but they never communicated and are on different teams.Also Jarrema was scried as a specific role by a wolf team that's been wiped out, and he hasn't contradicted it, so your current argument has to be that he was working with them, which doesn't make sense with spaceman tunneling him.
I voted Jarrema for a few days because I thought he was scummiest until the revenge seekers started jumping out at me. Choxorn defended me because I wasn't scummy. Is that not a satisfactory explanation?
I elaborated on what people questioned.Because you yourself elaborated more on the "weaker" case.
I'm not saying that I think Jarrema was working with the revenge seekers, I'm saying that Jarrema's the scummiest of the currently living players. Spaceman wanted to demonstrate his ability for the sake of appearing townie. Jarrema wanted to be cleared, so he didn't question it. This situation works even if both are scum but they never communicated and are on different teams.
What's still bothering you about it?Not particularly.
Fair enough, I guess.I elaborated on what people questioned.
Cuthilius and spaceman both specified he was Talia Garret, vanillager, and then spaceman pushed to lynch him anyway. It doesn't make sense that they both would say that unless either the scry was accurate, or Jarrema was working with them. Otherwise Jarrema just says "no I'm not" and Cuth and space get lynched.
Lynching anyone would give us that kind of information.
Yes it would. Which player would you say gives more of that kind of information than you?
There's not a lot of scum left, so we have room for error, but do you even think I'm scum anymore?
Choxorn's said nothing about it, for one. He's also the vote that saved your life on Day 1 and the vote that saved Al Sipsclar's yesterday (failing to mention the possibility of an Al Sipsclar lynch when he first said he would vote for spaceman) and is therefore independently suspect.
Al had more votes than remake at that point.I'll vote for Jarrema for now, but I'll switch to spaceman if it's between him, remake, and Double A, he's clearly the best lynch out of those three.