Return to Roots NES 2

I ask you this when you talk about 'realism' and being 'fair to all players' don't you get your plot ideas from history. In fact all continment have suffered rebellions in RL. To not do this in RTOR is wrong

YOU ARE ****ING PLAYING FAVOURITES
 
Jason: Yes i would revolt, against the invaders. God help the invader who lands in Florida.
 
Then why the **** don;t the Zulu?
 
EQ- Can you answer my question I edited in to my last post? I understand if you didn't see it before, just afriendly reminder.

LOL, we have had like over a page worth of replies in 30 min.
 
bs eq, if the government wasnt doing anything about an invasion, you wouldnt revolt to the us about actually doing something? I know i would if it were happening on the east coast. anyone else?

Jason
 
i would if someone invaded my country and the government went hey lets attack them instaed forget about the poor shmucks that are getting ****ed up the ass
 
You are right all continents have suffered rebbellions in RTOR and RL. Look at Eithiopia in this. They have revolted twice. There have been the Kenyans as well. But the people today of the US don't look like they are going to revolt do they? It is called loyalty.
 
Yeah how much loyalty do you think the people occupied by Hitler has to Hitler. Thats what Anarchy ans his Zulus are.

STOP PLAYING ****ING FAVOUROTES
 
Look, the fact is that EQ is the final say in the matter. He can choose "outlandish" results to simulate what happens in a random simulation for the battle. However, if anyone can't realzie this, then they are welcome to leave. Not all battles will be reflected realistically, and just because EQ isn't rolling dice to show that doesn't mean he doesn't have the option to make it so.

Suck up or shut up and leave.
 
how is it that Egypt didnt have loyalty when i played as them? How is it that Chinese didnt have loyalty before the other states broke off? How come the colonies of France have not revolted like my portugal, when i have held mine shorter time period? how come zululand has suffered nothing but good in this war? how come ethiopia has got nothing but good in this game? and when arab was with theiron fist, they were doing good too.
 
If the government wasn't doing anything then i would. I would free Florida for the US then make sure they damn haven't forgotton it. IF i had AIM i would gladly continue this. But i don't. The Zulu are loyal to their governement they always have been except once when Spainish mercenaries stirred up some trouble.
 
Yeah but the Zulu government is doing nothing to help them. And if they ahd all their armies fighing the invasions how come they still advanced in Egypt it doesn't make ****ing sense
 
All those other times I just caused the revolts to make things interesting. In these cases the revolts were funded by another nation. Eithiopia i made revolt just as practice way back then. The Chineese revolts i made just to see what would happen.

Thanks Toasty, glad to see i have an ally this time. As he said (without the suck up part) like it or leave it. This goes for any of you. Even if you don't like just live through it. naervod i am looking back now to answer your question
 
They are doing stuff to help them. The gueriolla war is sponsered by 1/5 of the Zulu army. So it is not like the ZSulu are doing nothing against the invasions.
 
OOC: I have spent two turns incresing Navy size and its still at large, the same as two turns ago.
 
naervod to answer your quest the Zulu press into your territory is because things are still messed up in your army. The Zulu advance happend only because he has the least messed up army over there.
 
Look. Story NESs are rough around the edges by nature. If you want "realistic" results, join a game-style NES, but don't complain about the faults of the NES type, and especially don't blame the person running the NES.
 
Back
Top Bottom