Rhye's and Fall of Civilization: Beyond the Sword

[a1Basco]

Rhye, you are the best there is. I don't post much(I've been lurking since your Civ 3 mod), but I keep track of everything.

I'm amazed how this mod has grown from the first version of it until now.

Your mod actually kept me from buying Warlords for a long while.. Now your mod is making me really anticipate BTS.

Rhye, have you ever thought about making independent video games? I'm sure your fan base is large enough so that you'd be able to make some money doing it.

 

[mitsho]

The last 2 civs will make y'all very happy.

I probably said too much already .

Poland & Ukraine?

(or even better: Britain? - yes, in addition to England would suit itself very well if you think of the HRE thing ).

I know you are not answering questions, Rhye, but I'm myself wondering at the moment to what you will rename Gilgamesh? Will he be a second leader for Babylon or for Persia? Depending on how he looks he might as well be Arabian Well, it doesn't matter at all.

Still curious to your revealations:

mick

 

[Whitefire]

I won't be happy without Poland so no everybody will be happy

Well, you got it. He added Poland, Great Britain and Ukraine.

 

[LuKo]

Well, you got it. He added Poland, Great Britain and Ukraine.

Ukraine is already in (England was changed to Ukraine)! So new civs are: Poland and GB

 

[Riker]

Italy is more important if you count it when it wasn't united too.

Like Germany?
BTW, all the g8 countries are in the game, except for Canada (for obviuos reasons) and Italy (only due to the Romans). If I had mod skills, I'd do it as a modcomp...

 

[LuKo]

Like Germany?

That's why in BtS HRE will be as a new nation

 

[botur2young]

I just realized something: Why aren't the Maya playable if you start in 600 AD? IIRC their civilization lasted from around 200 to 1000 AD.

 

[LuKo]

I have another question about Byzantium: why it is better than Greece. I found only bad things about it: unplayable nation which makes loading times even longer.

 

[botur2young]

Loading times would be just as long if Greece were used instead of the Byzantine Empire.

 

[Elhoim]

I have another question about Byzantium: why it is better than Greece. I found only bad things about it: unplayable nation which makes loading times even longer.

You are insistent, aren´t you?

 

[Riker]

Where there, in 600ad, Byzantines or Greeks? The answer is not an answer, but the answer

 

[Rhye]

how can you say that loading times are longer because of them?
They are using the Celts slot, which was almost useless in 600AD start

 

[dazman92]

guys, its Rhye. he'll figure it out, we'll all go "nice job!" and enter peaceful bliss.

 

[LuKo]

Loading times would be just as long if Greece were used instead of the Byzantine Empire.

Greece can resurrect, can't it?

You are insistent, aren´t you?

Of course I am Haven't you seen discussion about Poland?

 

[thenooblet22]

Will the minor civilizations still be divided as such: Independent 1, Independent 2, Natives, Celts?

 

[Rhye]

Will the minor civilizations still be divided as such: Independent 1, Independent 2, Natives, Celts?

written above: in 600AD start, it will be Independent 1, 2, natives and Byzantium

 

[botur2young]

Greece can resurrect, can't it?

It's my understanding that, in the 600 AD version, Greece can't resurrect.

 

[SadoMacho]

Greece did resurect in real live, but not as an important civ, not important enfhugh to be a civ in CIV.

 

[Whitefire]

Greece did resurect in real live, but not as an important civ, not important enfhugh to be a civ in CIV.

They're about as important as Ukraine.

Wow, I said Ukraine and wasn't joking for once.

 

[Pottery]

I have another surprise that I'll reveal soon

Is it about colonies, with new civs spawning off as vassals?