Rhye's of Civilization - the fastest loading mod Expanded
- Thread starter Rhye
- Start date
- Status
homersheineken
Chieftain
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2004
- Messages
- 95
Rhye said:
I guess what I"m looking for is a spreadsheet of all the units (and thus the changes made). The readme's are a good help, but i'm looking for a quick reference to all the units and gov't stats. Does that make sense?
Enkidu_Warrior
Shaman
Horton said:
horton - if you think this is bad, trying playing a huge map with 16 civs without the modpack!
Aeon221
Lord of the Cheese Helmet
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2003
- Messages
- 1,995
I deleted all my savegames a day or two ago cuz they were slowing down my computer (50 megs... too much!) so not an option... sorry!
They built it in 1954 (completed)... and I retired so that I can watch the histogram and find out when they started... but duh it doesnt tell you.
I HAVE A 1924 SAVE YESSS! Sending it to you Rhye!
They built it in 1954 (completed)... and I retired so that I can watch the histogram and find out when they started... but duh it doesnt tell you.
I HAVE A 1924 SAVE YESSS! Sending it to you Rhye!
Aeon221
Lord of the Cheese Helmet
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2003
- Messages
- 1,995
I am absolutely certain that they would never have gotten it without me giving them free techs randomly. Make it so that it also requires wine, move one of the mustangs to DC so that it will be built in a high production area, and make so that it requires something like bronzeworking... or just nothing. That way it takes Eurocontact and mustangs (which should probably come earlier than cav by enough to make it so that the statue can be built before the industrial era).
as is, america is relaly just a waste of space. its not fulfilling the role it is placed in the game to fulfill, and its already ahistorical enough. i think we need something drastic to justify its existence, and i think this is it.
as is, america is relaly just a waste of space. its not fulfilling the role it is placed in the game to fulfill, and its already ahistorical enough. i think we need something drastic to justify its existence, and i think this is it.
Gunner
Emperor
What would requiring wine serve to do?
Hello -- this is my first post, I checked as many pages of this thread as I could but I didn't see anything relating to my question:
I downloaded the Basic Mod v2.65, and then the expansion pack, but when I try to load the Expansion from the Civ.Content page, I get the message that I'm missing the following file: art/advisors/NP_all.pcx
Anyone have any ideas?
Thank you in advance,
Bradley RAVEN
edit: whoops I found the discussion with strikercw -- will try some of those suggestions
2nd edit: I downloaded the four separate 2.65 zip files, this apparently fixed my problem.
I downloaded the Basic Mod v2.65, and then the expansion pack, but when I try to load the Expansion from the Civ.Content page, I get the message that I'm missing the following file: art/advisors/NP_all.pcx
Anyone have any ideas?
Thank you in advance,
Bradley RAVEN
edit: whoops I found the discussion with strikercw -- will try some of those suggestions
2nd edit: I downloaded the four separate 2.65 zip files, this apparently fixed my problem.
Enkidu_Warrior
Shaman
Fintilgin - glad to hear you have it sorted 
Genovais - happy to help
Genovais - happy to help
Jeff1787
Sarge
I got the following error message...screen shot attached.
Three_Crowns
Information Retrieval
My game as America ended in failure and misery. The European powerhouses got to industial in 1812 AD and modern in 1916 AD. The Dutch built The Statue of Liberty in a colony in South America and the English built The India Trade Company on their main land - should it require spice within the city radius? Israel built many wonders - among them The UN. Do europeans have a new colonize advantage? Their colonies acquired culture fast and had enough production to swarm me with lancers. I am still stuck in the medieval age.
Jeff1787 said:
It seems that basic RoC isn't installed correctly.
Horton said:
It could be true, but I don't know what's causing this.
Three_Crowns
Information Retrieval
Rhye said:
It started to take a long time, between choosing new construction orders and being able to move, shortly after I was discovered by the Europeans. Maybe it is the high ship movementrates. Perhaps the AI is just idly moving them back and forth or moving in, bombard, moving out.
Aeon's savegame is OK. In 1924 it takes one minute for AI movements, and strangely additional 30 seconds after the production messages. 1 minute and half is a short wait, anyway.
While I work on the new patch for both RoC and RoCX (my aim is the end of the week)
I think you should start working on the guides.
My request is this:
->to the RoC guides users: can you update your guides to RoC, please?
Currently there are Rome, Greece, Germany, Russia, China, Persia, England, Ottomans, Austria, Arabia, Carthage, Netherlands, Byzantines, Inca. Written by Horton (most of them), Iztvan, Jaguar, Kello and Beernuts. Well, I think Kello and Iztvan are impossible to contact right now, so that leaves Russia and Inca to be edited by someone else. Well, if you want to edit someone else's guide, that's OK for me. I'll just write the two names of the authors.
->to who didn't write anything: can you make some guides for the remaining civs?
I'm attaching here the collection of the old guides
The first two pages are composed by cuts of generic comments. They SHOULD have been a "generic" tactical guide (tactical, to say Aeon's term).
Unfortunately they haven't got a definite structure, so the first two pages can only be an inspiration for who wants to write generic (non civ-specific) suggestions for RoCX. I remember someone of you (Enkidu W. or Three Chrowns, I don't remember) wrote something that would fit perfectly that introduction.
The rest of the guides are civ-specific and are excellent examples of how they should be.
They should be long approximately one page of the document (including the title), and should contain a rating of the civ strength. But this time (in RoCX) strength must consider the following aspects:
-Starting location (still the most important)
-Unique Units
-Traits and religious traits
Rel. Traits combo and the 2nd UU are the new aspects to be considered.
I think you should start working on the guides.
My request is this:
->to the RoC guides users: can you update your guides to RoC, please?
Currently there are Rome, Greece, Germany, Russia, China, Persia, England, Ottomans, Austria, Arabia, Carthage, Netherlands, Byzantines, Inca. Written by Horton (most of them), Iztvan, Jaguar, Kello and Beernuts. Well, I think Kello and Iztvan are impossible to contact right now, so that leaves Russia and Inca to be edited by someone else. Well, if you want to edit someone else's guide, that's OK for me. I'll just write the two names of the authors.
->to who didn't write anything: can you make some guides for the remaining civs?
I'm attaching here the collection of the old guides
The first two pages are composed by cuts of generic comments. They SHOULD have been a "generic" tactical guide (tactical, to say Aeon's term).
Unfortunately they haven't got a definite structure, so the first two pages can only be an inspiration for who wants to write generic (non civ-specific) suggestions for RoCX. I remember someone of you (Enkidu W. or Three Chrowns, I don't remember) wrote something that would fit perfectly that introduction.
The rest of the guides are civ-specific and are excellent examples of how they should be.
They should be long approximately one page of the document (including the title), and should contain a rating of the civ strength. But this time (in RoCX) strength must consider the following aspects:
-Starting location (still the most important)
-Unique Units
-Traits and religious traits
Rel. Traits combo and the 2nd UU are the new aspects to be considered.
Enkidu_Warrior
Shaman
Rhye said:
i believe you may be referring to my post #4031
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=2375770&postcount=4031
i'll see what i can do blending it with what you have in your intro.
in particular, i'd like to add a sentence or two about expecting more civ-specific challenges in ROC than stanard Civ or C3C
if anyone has any points they'd like me to add, just shoot them to me via PM and i'll try to work them into a coherent intro.
EW
Aeon221
Lord of the Cheese Helmet
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2003
- Messages
- 1,995
I thought wine should be included in the SoL so that even though it is available early on, it can only be built once trade with Europe is possible... since the French actually built it and America just set it up.
Making it cheaper would be nice too... its just that America was only included so that it could become a late game superpower, but is unable to do so without an altruistic European bumping it along. If we cannot make it useful, we may as well not include it!
Rhye, you were not able to see how many techs I gave them, but I am certain that it was a great number. Three Crowns and I (having both played as America recently), and I am certain many others, can assure you that it is really quite impossible to make it to the Modern age as America before the end of the game. Late industrial, maybe even to the end, but not all the way.
Making it cheaper would be nice too... its just that America was only included so that it could become a late game superpower, but is unable to do so without an altruistic European bumping it along. If we cannot make it useful, we may as well not include it!
Rhye, you were not able to see how many techs I gave them, but I am certain that it was a great number. Three Crowns and I (having both played as America recently), and I am certain many others, can assure you that it is really quite impossible to make it to the Modern age as America before the end of the game. Late industrial, maybe even to the end, but not all the way.
Enkidu_Warrior
Shaman
Rhye said:
i noticed this in the pre-expansion pack, when i got past turn 300. it's a funny time to have the computer spinning, but i'd assume it's going through each city, perhaps checking cultural borders or some such (ergo getting longer as the game wears on)
it's been a while since i played such a large-scale game on C3C so i dont recall if it occurs there too at that stage of the game
EW
Enkidu_Warrior said:i believe you may be referring to my post #4031
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showpost.php?p=2375770&postcount=4031
i'll see what i can do blending it with what you have in your intro.
in particular, i'd like to add a sentence or two about expecting more civ-specific challenges in ROC than stanard Civ or C3C
if anyone has any points they'd like me to add, just shoot them to me via PM and i'll try to work them into a coherent intro.
EW
yes, use mainly yours and expand it to RoCX (don't care of RoC, you can avoid mentioning it). That intro in the doc isn't a real intro; it's just a cut and paste from various sources; use it only if needed.
- Status
