- Joined
- Aug 12, 2010
- Messages
- 18,949
Wow, putting them all together really adds a little perspective
Yea, sure. So far I've done it only twice and just for fun. But what to do? Of course I dont have to capture the city by force and get the promotions, but the city will flip to me anyway and I will refuse it, because I dont want it. The endless loop will stillbbe there...Yes, but you are the one locked into that endless loop.
If you enjoy that kind of grind, fine.![]()
Dang, I wish I could get a full res image of that to serve as a desktop wallpaper!
Dang, I wish I could get a full res image of that to serve as a desktop wallpaper!
(If it CAN be done, please provide clues ... 'cause I'm clueless).
Thanx for the refresher. The resolution is satisfactory (just a little pixelization).Right click the image in the tweet -> view image -> save image as. That will give you the banner in the best possible resolution, but I don't know if that will look any good once blown up to fit whatever resolution your desktop is actually running at.
Russia, Poland, Arabia, Gandhi's India, Khmer, Spain. I wouldn't reccomend trying Kongo for obvious reasonReally want to try for a Religious victory since it's the only one I've never had (and largely ignored). I've stuck to mostly the R&F Civ's but not married to that idea so what civ would you recommend? Russia for the Lavra? Arabia? Tamar seems weak but honestly I'm not really sure. Was going to almost pick the Dutch just because I like them despite no religious bonuses
Really want to try for a Religious victory since it's the only one I've never had (and largely ignored). I've stuck to mostly the R&F Civ's but not married to that idea so what civ would you recommend? Russia for the Lavra? Arabia? Tamar seems weak but honestly I'm not really sure. Was going to almost pick the Dutch just because I like them despite no religious bonuses
You don't get era points from conquering a non-capital. I'll admit I'm not sure wheter city states count as capitals though.
Anyways, there's enough era points to get. Great People, high adjacency districts (I chopped a Holy Site just to ensure a Heroic Age in my current game), dedications, wonders (3-4 each!), and that's just the ones that are (almost) infinitely repeatable (except districts but you get it for each of 5 or 6 districts). Or some of them, it's not like I've been going through the list of historic moments to make sure I caught them all.
I don't mind getting into it or not, but I've fallen like two points short a few times. It just seems like a giant waste. I need better planning--to either hurry up with some new milestone, or to hold back a bit until the age changes.Sometimes I worry so much about getting into a golden age. And it causes me stress.I know I shouldn't stress so much about achieving a normal or golden age, but I do worry about it. I still like the mechanic, but I just don't like the worry part of it. I find myself building Taj Mahal every game just to help alleviate some of that stress. I'm not sure how viable Taj Mahal is at higher levels, but I've been able to build it so far.
The mechanic reminds me of games with time limits, I'm looking at you Xcom2. And I don't care for time limits.
I am still in my first game and besides the normal ancient era I've had 4 golden ages, nothing else. Playing as Zulu, so no special bonuses for ages. And especially the last golden age was with a huuuuuuge overflow of era points.
Is this normal? Is it so easy?
Ha, normally I don't like too much golden age excess points, but I'm kind of proud of this one. This shows how imbalanced warmongering is for getting golden age points. Granted, I did a Looot of warmongering with the Zulu. I needed 108 to get a golden age, I got 173. picture below in spoiler tags
I'm thinking Firaxis needs to give peaceful players a little something for getting golden ages to help balance this out.
Spoiler :![]()