Gandhi will declare on us. Probably in ~10 turns, or if I misread the code in ~ 4 turns.Ignore Gandhi and his settlement plans.
And if we let him declare the base value for refuse to talk is 12 turns instead of 6.
Gandhi will declare on us. Probably in ~10 turns, or if I misread the code in ~ 4 turns.Ignore Gandhi and his settlement plans.
We can, probably. He should pay, if we demand 10g. That's 10 turns of peace. But still doesn't solve the long term problem.All right, so there's no way to avoid the war? We can't force a peace treaty with him, right?
That's funny. I did a test run, trying to answer Erkon's question, but didn't think of that.We can, probably. He should pay, if we demand 10g. That's 10 turns of peace. But still doesn't solve the long term problem.
T51 mv to SHN
IT BarbG mv to SHS-1se
T52 mv to SHS
IT BarbG retreats to fog
T53 stay at SHS
IT ?? (best case scenario: BarbG goes to Parthian)
T54 mv to GC-1e
IT ?? (BarbG might have moved to SHS-2se)
T55 mv to GC to drop off knight
IT ?? ([COLOR="Red"]BarbG could move to SHS[/COLOR])
trade at techtrade% #ofOtherAIsMustKnowTech
Gandhi furious 20% 1
Churchill cautious 30% 2
Roosy cautious 30% 2 or Friendly+0
dG cautious 40% 2
Mao cautious 50% 3
Well, we can probably keep the second fish in A., but that needs theater before library and work an artist most of the time until second culture expansion ~T73. Build settler in Mu. and CC for both stone and marbleI'd rather see Alca, Stone and Marble settled asap, but frankly, I don't see how we can even keep the second fish on T72, to say nothing of keeping it after Roosy builds a Stupa, Mahabodhi, or whatever. The galley gets the settler to marble on T68, a galleon on T71......alas.
I'd go for it. Something like send the settler + wkr to Marble, switch GC immediately to wb for the third wb. Build the stone settler in Murkow. Pretty cool actually. Crazy but cool.
That's livin'! Sending the marble settler by galleon can mean two wkrs. But I'm always reluctant to build wbs in cities that need to build other stuff, especially bldgs like a library, when more mature cities can instead. What would we use marble for? GS city? Spam settlers?Well, we can probably keep the second fish in A., but that needs theater before library and work an artist most of the time until second culture expansion ~T73. Build settler in Mu. and CC for both stone and marble
Going for marble, OTOS, 3rd wb shouldn't be necessary, we could chop it there.
Marble would probably build at least 1-2 settlers, for nearby nice sites. If it then still makes sense to do a GS is another question.That's livin'! Sending the marble settler by galleon can mean two wkrs. But I'm always reluctant to build wbs in cities that need to build other stuff, especially bldgs like a library, when more mature cities can instead. What would we use marble for? GS city? Spam settlers?
Edit: When do you see the Murkow and CC settlers finished?
5popping CC is also a cost to weigh in, I suppose.I'm still unsure what to do. Alca has to be settled now to have 2 fish and is beneficial immediately by the trade routes in our continental cities, while the settler under way will cost.
OTOH, marble (the resource) would be really nice to have soon. Marble city is the better city in the long run and another settler before Kremlin is quite some effort.
Tech Timeline
--------------
T75 RepPts
T85 Rifling (trade for GP by T75)
T95 Chem
T105 Steel
T115 Elect + Fission
T123 Artillery
T130 Rocketry
To make a long story short:I fail to see what big things we can still do during this GA. Murkow, CC and Pete are anyway running on food we scarcely can afford. We can run scientists in Sala at size 6 for ~250 GPP, that's about it.