Compromise now lurking.
Given that the apparent best capital site is 1W, is it better to move the warrior before moving the Settler 1W? Warrior W, SW, S reveals nothing new. NE, E, or SE reveal mostly water tiles. N is on a hill and so beats NW.
So, if the warrior moves first, it is 1N, but since moving the settler 1W will reveal the entire BFC of the 1W site, I'm hard-pressed to say what we'd need to see from the warrior to *not* move the settler 1W. Whatever is N of the warrior is likely to go to a later Crab City anyway.
The only other thing is if 1W with settler makes us consider settling on the forested plains hill 1S of the Sheep, but it seems unlikely that a 2H capital is worth giving up cow and wet corn. Especially since we'd be moving there blindly.
I don't know if it will help much to run tests before getting more map info.