SGOTM3 Rome - Maintenance Thread
- Thread starter mad-bax
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2003
- Messages
- 5,242
I am aware that a couple of teams have lost members. If any of those teams would like a replacement player (emperor level), then please let me know by PM. Tomorrow I will be able to devote some time to housekeeping for this game, and may contact the teams directly through their respective game threads.
To allow teams to compare performance in the score graph at a higher resolution, I have added an upper date limit menu. Choose a lower date limit, and the X and Y axes will scale to display more detail of early game progress.
Mauer
Pompous Noble
Good thinking Alanh 
Much easier on the weary ol'eyes.
Much easier on the weary ol'eyes.
Demiurge
Warlord
That's just awesome AlanH. I bet I'm not the only one that's wished the graph could be viewed in such a way. As always your a little bit ahead of the game. Well, maybe not the SGOTM. 
Now that you can see the lines in more detail, you'll see that the Xteam is actually doing quite well in comparison with the other variant teams - all but one, that is. You can also see Smackster's abrupt change of gear immdiately after their first leader built the Pyamids.Demiurge said:.... your a little bit ahead of the game. Well, maybe not the SGOTM.
Mauer
Pompous Noble
I think everyone is just trying to get a rise out of you Alanh. Don't take any of it personally. When it comes down to it, we all know you are one of the best. Not only at the game, but you are also a top notch mod.
microbe
Cascaded Mansion
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2003
- Messages
- 4,596
I hate it, but I guess I have to ask:
What if AI declares on us (earlier than the date we are supposed to declare on it)? Will it change anything in the order of events and their dates?
For example, we know AI in order of A, B, C.
We declare on A in turn X, and thus are supposed to declare on B in turn X+20, on C in turn X+40.
What if in turn X+5, B declares on us?
Do we have to declare on C in turn X+30? Or still turn+40?
What if in turn X+5, C declares on us? Do we have to declare on B in turn 15, 20, or 40?
I hate those rules you know. We probably wouldn't do it "right" no matter what, but I ask anyway.
What if AI declares on us (earlier than the date we are supposed to declare on it)? Will it change anything in the order of events and their dates?
For example, we know AI in order of A, B, C.
We declare on A in turn X, and thus are supposed to declare on B in turn X+20, on C in turn X+40.
What if in turn X+5, B declares on us?
Do we have to declare on C in turn X+30? Or still turn+40?
What if in turn X+5, C declares on us? Do we have to declare on B in turn 15, 20, or 40?
I hate those rules you know. We probably wouldn't do it "right" no matter what, but I ask anyway.
SesnOfWthr
True Believer
Microbe - We had to ask this question as well.
This is the answer we were given:
If B declares early (turnY), declare on C on turn Y + 20.
If C declares early, then ignore them in the list and declare on B on turn X+20, and civ D on turn X+40.
HTH
This is the answer we were given:
If B declares early (turnY), declare on C on turn Y + 20.
If C declares early, then ignore them in the list and declare on B on turn X+20, and civ D on turn X+40.
HTH
DJMGator13
Still breathing
SesnOfWthr said:
I thought D still remained at X+60, and no DOW was needed at X+40 (C's turn)because you were already at war with C?
A = X
B = X+20
C = X+40 (already at war, since prior to B)
D = X+60
SesnOfWthr
True Believer
Hmmm. I hope you're wrong, or we have made things more difficult on ourselves. 
I am also having trouble locating the quote from MB.
I am also having trouble locating the quote from MB.
SesnOfWthr
True Believer
Good news all!
Team Sesn has misinterpreted the rules, making things more difficult than they had to be. Of course, this will make our eventual victory all the more impressive ....
At any rate, in post 48 of this thread, civ_Steve asks this very question, and MB answered in turn 51.
Team Sesn has misinterpreted the rules, making things more difficult than they had to be. Of course, this will make our eventual victory all the more impressive ....
At any rate, in post 48 of this thread, civ_Steve asks this very question, and MB answered in turn 51.
ChronoReverse
Chieftain
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2004
- Messages
- 28
Don't worry, you're not the only group that did that 
ForTheEmpire
Warlord
If only DJMGator could have posted that correction last night right after sesn posted his interpretation...
Mistfit
Deity
Hmmm...did he do it on purpose? muahahahaha....
ForTheEmpire
Warlord
I believe in the intergrity and honor of people! I refuse to believe one would be capable of something so low! Then again, he is a BoSox fan...
SesnOfWthr
True Believer
ahem
If you'll recall, I also said my team had been doing it wrong as well. It translated to being at full on AW about 60 turns earlier than necessary.
And as for my team, nothing builds integrity like losing...
If you'll recall, I also said my team had been doing it wrong as well. It translated to being at full on AW about 60 turns earlier than necessary.
And as for my team, nothing builds integrity like losing...
