El Justo said:how bout shaq for iverson?![]()
it would never happen but all they talk about in philly/south jersey is how or when AI will get traded. that little dude has a ton of heart.
not sure if anyone knows this or even cares but the steinbrenner character on seinfeld is played by Larry David (seinfeld creator and of hbo fame)
pboily said:In Toronto, they're talking (at least, the few people who care, I'll try to find the article) about Vinsanity for A.I.... can't imagine Iverson moving to Canada. It would be a good move for the Raptors and a dreadful one for the Sixers...
Azale said:Man, i like Webber, I really do. But hes choked so many times in important situations (time out debacle, missing the free throws in Game 7 against the Lakers, in and out 3 against T'Wolves this year). Why would the Lakers want him?
Stojakovic on the other hand....he was 4th I think in MVP voting, a very good shooter, and about 26 I think. Hes worth something.
But like I said, the Lakers wont trade Shaq to the Kings.
Azale said:The Lakers still intend on trading Shaq if thier are offers....I dont know where your hearing that the deal is off.
If I were LA I would trade Shaq for Dirk in a second, it could make it easier to resign Kobe and you would only be a piece or a bench away from being a championship caliber team. For the life of me though I can't understand why Dallas would want to do the deal though, Dirk hasn't reached his prime yet while Shaq only has a few more years left. You would have to be confident that Shaq could get you the title this year or next and I don't think that is the case. He is an old 32. I see him playing in the east, most blockbuster trades are between conferences these days.pawpaw said:mitch kupchek the laker gm went on l.a. radio show and said that. as far as dallas, you hear dallas saying dirk is untouchable or close to untouchable--you do not here the lakers saying anything