Should Bush pardon Libby?

Should 'Scooter' be pardonned?


  • Total voters
    71
Well, Fitzgerald was just trying to nail someone in the administration. So yes, I don't see any reason why Libby shouldn't get a pardon.

so here's your train of thought:

fitzgerald wanted to pin somebody with a crime.
he pinned libby with a crime.
libby should get away with it because fitzgerald set out to pin him.

seriously?
 
The whole pretense of Fitzgerald's investigation was false, however: Valerie Plame was not a covert agent of the CIA under any standard.
 
The whole pretense of Fitzgerald's investigation was false, however: Valerie Plame was not a covert agent of the CIA under any standard.

That's true. This was entirely political. What, does someone think dems don't do things like that?!

Anyway, the guy's name is SCOOTER. You can't bust someone named scooter, it's in the rules.

If you're gonna bust people, bust people named Axelrod, Rod and Rahm. You can try to bust Dick, but he the most awesomist.
 
The whole pretense of Fitzgerald's investigation was false, however: Valerie Plame was not a covert agent of the CIA under any standard.

Sadly, no:

An unclassified summary of outed CIA officer Valerie Plame's employment history at the spy agency, disclosed for the first time today in a court filing by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, indicates that Plame was "covert" when her name became public in July 2003.

Cleo
 
Remember, in the CIA, having a desk job and shuffling papers is still considered 'covert'......hell, they have ninjas make the coffee in that place...
So one should be very careful about outing someone in the CIA or obstruicting an investigation about such an outing, unless you can count on at least a commute for the Pres.
 
Seems I am not the only one whose predictions arent going so well in 2008.

Well the economy being in good shape and especially the stockmarket comments werent the best of predictions. At least your not scrambling to place blame on the democrates.
 
Bush Pardons 19 More After Questioning

Before leaving for the holidays, President Bush commuted one prison sentence and granted 19 pardons, including one to a man who helped the Jewish resistance in the 1940s.


With this latest batch, Bush has granted a total of 191 pardons and nine commutations. That's fewer than half as many as Presidents Clinton or Reagan issued during their two terms.

Included in the latest list is Charles Winters, who died in the 1980s in Florida. Winters helped ship arms and aircraft to Jews trying to found their own state in the Middle East. He was convicted of violating the Neutrality Act and served 18 months in prison. Two others, Herman Greenspun and Al Schwimmer, also were convicted but did not serve time. They were later granted presidential pardons.

Bush also pardoned Issac Toussie, who pleaded guilty to making false statements to HUD and mail fraud as part of a massive housing scam.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/23/white-house-warns-expect_n_153153.html

What is Bush thinking ?
Oh well at least hes nearly gone from office.
 
Will we need to listen to EVERY pardon from people on CFC? How tiresome. As if Clinton pardoning a guy who had served time for child molestation is not the worst. All presidents have hundreds of pardons; please, please spare us the daily update. And have enough self-respect to cite something more decent than huffington. And no hack books either. Obviously, people can get the same story from somewhere else... no need to show one's bias with such a complete lack of self-awareness.
 
He won't pardon Libby because pardoned people can't plead the Fifth Amendment. That's my prediction. I hope I'm wrong.

It will be interesting to watch the coming pardons, though, especially with respect to the administration's detention policy. Will Bush pardon people so that they can no longer plead the Fifth Amendment? Then a fact-finding commission will have full access to everything, and if the facts are heinous enough, I could see the American people supporting international prosecutions. Or will he not pardon them and hope that Obama won't be willing to prosecute? Most current Democrats are political cowards, so I think the latter is a safe bet, but if it's wrong . . .

Cleo
 
Fantasizing about heinous evidence is not healthy. Strange, I don't remember you supporting fantasizing about Obama and the senate seat.
 
He won't pardon Libby because pardoned people can't plead the Fifth Amendment. That's my prediction. I hope I'm wrong.

It will be interesting to watch the coming pardons, though, especially with respect to the administration's detention policy. Will Bush pardon people so that they can no longer plead the Fifth Amendment? Then a fact-finding commission will have full access to everything, and if the facts are heinous enough, I could see the American people supporting international prosecutions. Or will he not pardon them and hope that Obama won't be willing to prosecute? Most current Democrats are political cowards, so I think the latter is a safe bet, but if it's wrong . . .

Cleo

Pardoned people may not be able to plead the 5th, but then do they need to? Because they can't be imprisoned for anything they did that they were pardoned for all they need to do is refuse to testify. Or would that open them up to contempt or obstruction charges?
 
Pardoned people may not be able to plead the 5th, but then do they need to? Because they can't be imprisoned for anything they did that they were pardoned for all they need to do is refuse to testify. Or would that open them up to contempt or obstruction charges?

It would be contempt. Normally you can't be held in contempt for refusing to answer a question that would incriminate you. But pardoned people can't "incriminate" themselves, so they can't refuse to testify about crimes they committed. And Obama's transition team has said that he wants to form a fact-finding commission (like the 9/11 commission) to determine what happened; if Bush pardons a bunch of people, they have to testify about any crimes they might have committed.

So if it's going to be a fact-finding commission, it's in Bush's interest not to pardon, but then if he doesn't pardon, there could be prosecutions. Sort of a Catch-22. Unless, of course, Obama listens to the Beltway establishment and simply doesn't do anything about it.

Cleo
 
Unless evidence has been sufficiently destroyed. Still, if Obama does not pursue it, I'll be very disappointed in him.
 
Back
Top Bottom