Who wouldn't want sycophants? 
Seriously, I *knew* I shouldn't have typed that. But next month I probably get to sink back into obscurity, so all's well.
Thank you for the compliment. Seriously, though, it is amazing how much better you play when you're confident with a level than when you're not - all other issues aside.
As for the wars, I'd be in favor of continuing the push on Babylon (with concomittant annihilation of the French expeditionary forces) until the French finally cave -- it has got to be soon, by the way. They've lost six cities to us (even if not razed) and probably 20 units, and they lost Rouen (razed) and a bunch of units to the Ottomans. We've lost maybe one or two tanks to them. So as long as we stay at war, they'll be doomed, and it shouldn't affect us much. Babylon shouldn't do much damage on the counterattack, even with tanks, if we're defending with mech inf. (Their oil is by Akkad, by the way, a fair distance.)
After that ... well, Borealis is a perfectly capable warmonger.
Renata

Seriously, I *knew* I shouldn't have typed that. But next month I probably get to sink back into obscurity, so all's well.

As for the wars, I'd be in favor of continuing the push on Babylon (with concomittant annihilation of the French expeditionary forces) until the French finally cave -- it has got to be soon, by the way. They've lost six cities to us (even if not razed) and probably 20 units, and they lost Rouen (razed) and a bunch of units to the Ottomans. We've lost maybe one or two tanks to them. So as long as we stay at war, they'll be doomed, and it shouldn't affect us much. Babylon shouldn't do much damage on the counterattack, even with tanks, if we're defending with mech inf. (Their oil is by Akkad, by the way, a fair distance.)
After that ... well, Borealis is a perfectly capable warmonger.

Renata