Flamand
The Visible Elder!
This was the first deep space vessel called Enterprise. It never appeared on screens, only in pictures and paintings on the walls of the later Enterprises...
Never seen it? Ive seen it plenty of times in obscure places. This was actually one of the sketches that Jeffreys made for the original TOS Enterprise that eventually took the form of the Constitution class.Bjornlo said:funky looking thing. Never saw it before. Where is it from?
Flamand said:No need to do that one anymore, Morpheus already made a very nice version 1.5 years ago: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?postid=1495692
The list in the first post show just the ones missing from the mod that still need to be made. But don't worry, the original Enterprise will definitely not be forgotten...![]()
Annotations
1) The SS Enterprise is based on an old design by Matt Jefferies, one of his first ideas for the original Enterprise. It was included to a display on the recreation deck of the USS Enterprise in "Star Trek: The Motion Picture", together with other ships named Enterprise. In the bar in ENT: "First Flight", we can see an image of the SS Enterprise too. Considering that it is shown there as a tribute to test pilots, the ship is very likely supposed to still exist.
2) The strange ring structure, where the ring obviously houses the propulsion system, doesn't fit into the Federation design lineage. The ship, however, looks very similar to the Vulcan Surak class. It is possible that humans acquired one or more Vulcan ships, which would explain the name "Enterprise". It is also possible that it is a prototype ship built by humans, inspired by Vulcan technology. If this is so, the project was apparently a failure, considering that all known later Federation starship designs have the familiar nacelles again.
3) The non-canon Space Flight Chronology suggests that the SS Enterprise should have been a 300m long starliner for 800 passengers. As Paul Cargile pointed out some time ago, this is complete bogus. At 300m, the inhabitable bow section would be smaller than the Defiant, and imagine 800 people in there!
4) Rick Sternbach said about the design at TrekBBS: "My only exposure to that design was back in 1978 when I was on ST:TMP. The script called for a few ships called Enterprise to be exhibited in the Rec Room. Gene Roddenberry asked me to stop by his office, where he
gave me a copy of the painting of the ship, printed as a poster. He asked me to make that design one of the five or so ships in the Rec Room alcove. So who was I to say no? ... As to how that ship fits into Trek history, I really don't have anything intelligent to say. I don't know much about it, never speculated about uh, specs, and have no real opinion about whether it was a civvie vessel or a Federation vessel or just what it was. I also have no additional drawings or even the poster I worked from in 1978. You'll all have to carry on as best you can to shoehorn it into the lore."
5) If the SS Enterprise (note that the prefix SS is only conjectural) is no Starfleet ship, there is no naming conflict, and it may have been in service at any time prior to 2153.
Yeah I know it is the one from the first movie... You want the one with the round red nacelles, right? I'll see what I can do, but no promises.Thorgrimm said:Flamand, I hate to bust your bubble, but that is the NCC-1701-A! Not the original Enterprise from TOS.![]()
Like this you're going to make me feel guilty...Thorgrimm said:Remember this was the ship that protected the Federation for many years, and because of that, is far more important than the upgrades.![]()
Flamand said:I'm happy to say that James T. Kirk has his own ship now...![]()