LightSpectra
me autem minui
This exercise is fruitless. I'd rather be bitter about the prequels sucking with an irrationalized scapegoat.
ı think the central issue driving the prequel triogies is the sense of betrayal Anakin felt to drive him away from the good - for a moment
Not really. That was prevalent in the seventies-eighties EU stuff, along with Alan Dean Foster's novelization of the first movie (and even then, not that prevalent; Brian Daley's Han Solo books imply pretty strongly that the Empire is new and its control of much of the galaxy is somewhat weak) but by the time Tim Zahn wrote the Thrawn trilogy, pretty much everybody had the Clone Wars nailed down to somewhere between thirty and twenty years before ANH. With the exception of the ANH novelization itself, I don't think there's anything that explicitly contradicts the notion of having the Clone Wars a few decades beforehand.What was really odd about the sequels is how young the make the empire. In the original trilogy, it's the general impression the empire is around for at least some decades, with the Jedi being gone for at least more than one human generation (enough for people like Han Solo to consider the force a fairy tale).
Jedi make stories more interesting. Even books that aren't about Jedi end up including them for the awesome factor. Plus, since one of the main things differentiating the Star Wars universe from every other sci-fi/space opera IP out there is the Force, it makes sense to bring that in.Okay, but some of the summaries of Star Wars novels make it feel like every second Republic citizen was a Jedi![]()
I'm far from versed in Star Wars canon, but how hard would it have been to put in some sort of story about how Jedi age at a slower rate due to their connection to the force (or something similar)? That way the Empire can have been around for longer while still having strange age issues resulting from Alec Guinness looking 63.And, of course, there's the age factor; Obi-Wan had to have had to have been able to train Anakin and then see him lost to the dark side, and with Alec Guinness being 63 when ANH came out, there really isn't a particularly big window for that to have happened. ("A few more decades" would've put the Clone Wars in Obi-Wan's teens and made nonsense of Obi-Wan having been Anakin's Master.)
Fair point. Maybe I was focusing to much on A New Hope, which really had a different concept of the lore than even its sequels (and integral aspects of the story like Vader = Anakin Skywalker (do I need to put this into spoilers?Not really. That was prevalent in the seventies-eighties EU stuff, along with Alan Dean Foster's novelization of the first movie (and even then, not that prevalent; Brian Daley's Han Solo books imply pretty strongly that the Empire is new and its control of much of the galaxy is somewhat weak) but by the time Tim Zahn wrote the Thrawn trilogy, pretty much everybody had the Clone Wars nailed down to somewhere between thirty and twenty years before ANH. With the exception of the ANH novelization itself, I don't think there's anything that explicitly contradicts the notion of having the Clone Wars a few decades beforehand.
And, of course, there's the age factor; Obi-Wan had to have had to have been able to train Anakin and then see him lost to the dark side, and with Alec Guinness being 63 when ANH came out, there really isn't a particularly big window for that to have happened. ("A few more decades" would've put the Clone Wars in Obi-Wan's teens and made nonsense of Obi-Wan having been Anakin's Master.)
Sure. That's one reason why I don't like the Star Wars EU or EUs in general. They have to copy elements of the canon to stay close to it, but by doing so they make the canon material less unique, which often detracts from its appeal.Jedi make stories more interesting. Even books that aren't about Jedi end up including them for the awesome factor. Plus, since one of the main things differentiating the Star Wars universe from every other sci-fi/space opera IP out there is the Force, it makes sense to bring that in.
I guess you could, in theory, although it would still clash with Luke and Leia (since they were conceived by Anakin but he didn't know of their existence, much less that there were two, something separated Anakin and Padmé between conception and birth, and damn if the destruction of the Jedi doesn't fit pretty well there). And you'd have to explain how Obi-Wan could have served Bail Organa in the Clone Wars, since Organa was notably not Force-sensitive and therefore would have, in your system, aged faster than Kenobi (yet still have been around). But why would you want to? Honestly, the story fits better this way.I'm far from versed in Star Wars canon, but how hard would it have been to put in some sort of story about how Jedi age at a slower rate due to their connection to the force (or something similar)? That way the Empire can have been around for longer while still having strange age issues resulting from Alec Guinness looking 63.
Are you describing an alternate version of the story here?
Because Anakin is obviously NOT "totally good", as Episode II goes out of its way to show, even without any direct meddling on Palpatine's part at all.
ahha that must be sand people and the tiny massacre Anakin conducted . Would give an example on how at the time warfare was conducted in the area called Greater Middle East in 2002 and how that still did not clear an offensive , but then it would finaly end in an infraction . One might actually put a lot of Palpatine trickery onto it . But that would add another 30 minutes into it and would cut the Episodes -3 , -2 and -1 . There is still hope for them . Maybe .