Back on 27 Oct Siran, while while clarifying some discussion on the pyramid wonder, brought forward some points on government civics. The note on Hereditary Rule vs Representation has me a little confused.
I understand that early in the game the research bonus is largely wasted. I'm confused as to his statement about upkeep costs. In my current game I have 5 cities. Rather then settle more cities I want to develop these 5 core cities as much as possible. So in my case, as I understand it I'm better off with Representation.
Representation
- low up keep
- +3 happiness in 5 largest cities (I only have 5)
- +3 science per specialist (which we agree is of limited value in the early game)
HR
- medium up keep
- military units increase happiness
So my read, pertaining to my 5 cities game is that it will cost me less to have more happiness in my 5 cities by going the Representation route, then by going the HR route.
I realise that Siran's statement was in the general sense of the game, and that in my particular case it may not apply. But the Civpedia, and the manual are rather vague on all of the + and - of the civics, and when someone of Siran's experience questions the value of representation, it makes me wonder if I made a mistake with my own line of thinking.