BvBPL
Pour Decision Maker
In case you didn’t know it, America is weird. The US doesn’t have a national sales tax, VAT, or GST. Instead, the various local states can impose local taxes on the sale and use of goods and services. However, the states have limited abilities to tax a remote seller; if a seller has no local presence within the state, the state cannot tax the transaction. This has led to most internet purchases not being taxed.
As internet sales have climbed and taken away sales from local merchants, states have seen their sales tax revenues dry up. As a result, many states are now pushing for a reform of the tax law to force remote merchants to remit sales tax to the state of the purchaser. This reform is a bit of a ways off from being realized, but it is clear that there’s a movement afoot to change how remote sales are taxed.
Merchants claim, correctly, that remitting sales taxes to a remote jurisdiction is a daunting technical challenge. In addition to imposing sales taxes themselves, many states also permit local jurisdictions to impose their own sales and use taxes. This can get really granular with some areas subject to state, county, city, and district sales and use taxes, all of which need to be sent to different agencies. Not every merchant is capable of maintaining those distinction in its sales.
Some states and merchants have reached a middle ground wherein the merchants voluntarily remit sales tax to the state. Amazon started to do this in 2012 under pressure from various states.
Further complicating things are the NOMAD states, five states that do not impose sales taxes upon purchases. If remote sales were to be taxed then these states basically get a bum deal because they will miss out on that revenue. At this point, remote sales generally have a level playing field for NOMAD states.
Should sales on the internet be taxed? Should the US adopt a national sales tax, GST, or VAT? Why is it that sales tax is decried as regressive but is imposed on a national level by most nations?
As internet sales have climbed and taken away sales from local merchants, states have seen their sales tax revenues dry up. As a result, many states are now pushing for a reform of the tax law to force remote merchants to remit sales tax to the state of the purchaser. This reform is a bit of a ways off from being realized, but it is clear that there’s a movement afoot to change how remote sales are taxed.
Merchants claim, correctly, that remitting sales taxes to a remote jurisdiction is a daunting technical challenge. In addition to imposing sales taxes themselves, many states also permit local jurisdictions to impose their own sales and use taxes. This can get really granular with some areas subject to state, county, city, and district sales and use taxes, all of which need to be sent to different agencies. Not every merchant is capable of maintaining those distinction in its sales.
Some states and merchants have reached a middle ground wherein the merchants voluntarily remit sales tax to the state. Amazon started to do this in 2012 under pressure from various states.
Further complicating things are the NOMAD states, five states that do not impose sales taxes upon purchases. If remote sales were to be taxed then these states basically get a bum deal because they will miss out on that revenue. At this point, remote sales generally have a level playing field for NOMAD states.
Should sales on the internet be taxed? Should the US adopt a national sales tax, GST, or VAT? Why is it that sales tax is decried as regressive but is imposed on a national level by most nations?