Genocidicbunny
Bug squasher
That this is alive and going so well makes me happy!
What nickname are you folding under?

That this is alive and going so well makes me happy!
Well, before trying the VM, I went and installed more stable drivers, and what do you know, Im up to almost 10,000ppd.
That this is alive and going so well makes me happy!
What nickname are you folding under?![]()
Yep, more stable drivers for the GPU. I was using 185.20 ones, but now im down to 182. something, the latest full release ones.Stable drivers for the GPU card? And what is your CPU folding on the Q6600 churning for PPD now? (I'm trying to verify that mine is optimized.)
Why set up VM for folding, you have FAH for almost every platform you see on your PC.
The SMP client seems to be a bit inefficient, its not using all of the CPU that it can be, as obvious by the screenshot of FahMon. Setting up the SMP VM's basically doubles its production. Some people have managed to squeeze out triple production too. 1800ppd/cpu on a hyperthreaded Core i7 is amazing points, considering that without it it makes like 2000ppd.
It is a helluva lot more work than just running the SMP service though. Im pondering scrapping that idea and instead adding a second GTX 260+ next month. That will effectively give me another 7000ppd. Maybe even two if I feel like splurging and I find a good deal. Only problem with that plan though is my PSU. Here's hoping a 750TX can handle 3 GTX 260's
If SMP is inefficient, run several uniprocessor cores then.
Well, last time I check, it takes 90% of total CPU.
BTW, this is Linux.
Well the question now is if you have bigger pockets. Im not gonna spend more than 300$ on upgrades, so if you've got more than that, you're golden. Plus losing your 3rd place is like a year away.Hmmm... escalation...
I'm doing some pondering myself. I'm not sure I'm ready to drop out of third place yet.![]()
Uniprocessor clients are even worse. Ive tried. The fact that its using "100% CPU" doesnt actually mean its using all of the cycles. Having the VM's run forces it to do that pretty much. Its why when I run the normal SMP client, at 100% CPU the core temps are around 62C. With the SMP VM's, at 100% CPU the core temps are closer to 70. The VM's push the CPU just about as far as it will go.
Maybe it is just VM software takes additional CPU cycles.
Well the question now is if you have bigger pockets. Im not gonna spend more than 300$ on upgrades, so if you've got more than that, you're golden. Plus losing your 3rd place is like a year away.