Term 2 - Nominations for Judge Advocate

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chieftess

Moderator
Retired Moderator
Joined
Feb 10, 2002
Messages
24,160
Location
Baltimore
All members of the judiciary share several traditional rights and responsibilities:

Post polls and discussion on interpretations of the Constitution, Code of Laws, and Code of Standards.
Do not have Deputies but may appoint Pro-Tem justicesif they are unable to fulfill their duties. Pro-Tem officials have all of the rights and responsibilities of the officials they are filling in for but are a temporary position and must surrender their pro-tem status upon the request of the official.
Participate in Judicial Review to determine the legality of proposed amendments, laws and standards.
Initiate and participate in Judicial Review to interpret and clarify existing amendments, laws and standards.
Initiate and participate in Judicial Review to dismiss investigations as having "No Merit".
Post Legislative polls that have passed Judicial Review (chief justice only).

Please Accept or Decline any nominations you receive.
 
I nominate Cyc, Donsig, Bill_in_PDX, gert_janl, KCCrusader, and Immortal
Note: I am nominating the above in all judiciary positions, as i do not know which they prefer.
 
I Second Donsig and Immortal
 
I 2nd donsig and Oct.
 
i support Donsig and immo (btw immo might not be able to accept as he got himself banned for a few days), LOOK oct i nominated you for prez, run there again :D
 
I will Decline this nomination.
 
To the candidates for Judge Advocate:

1. How would you conduct yourself should charges be brought against a good friend of yours that you consider baseless?

2. The vast majority of JR's this term passed without any public comments. What do you plan to do bring more citizen participation to these review?

3. Why should I vote for you?

-- Ravensfire
 
1. Before any sort of trial gets into motion, where I would be acting in an official capacity, I would defend this friend and try to resvole differences outside a trial. Of course, this goes both ways: I'd do the same for someone I may dislike if I feel the charge is invalid, or politically motivated. Though, if the general public still felt some action was needed, I would take it.

2. I can't say I have any plans. It's rather difficult to get people to participate in something they don't care about, or find rather dull. Short of forcibly shoving such matter down a citizen's throat, there's not much one can do.

3. Experience may the word. I've been the DG bench before, and have a good idea of what I'm doing.

Besides, no one else is running. :p
 
Due to the Acceptance of my Nomination for Domestic Minister, I must humbly Decline this Nomination for JA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom