Term 2 - Province of Bohemia

[disorganizer]

Cyc:
Welcome aboard our new interim governor...


BtW:
I would like to give up the mayorial position in bavaria in favor of a mayor position in morgana.
Now how can we resolv this?
Reasons:
Well, i just want to be nearer to my homelands.

 

[Cyc]

A duel with Octavian X at dawn? Nah!

 

[disorganizer]

Why not? ;-)
no, i thought about our first mayorial elections
let populace decide. i just dont know wether only morgana citizens except oct and me would be eligable to vote or everyone

 

[Cyc]

Well, we should definately bring Octavian X into this discussion.

 

[disorganizer]

I hope he responds :-(
I would be willing to swap mayorship with him even to settle this as peaceful as possible, but i urgently want to be near my castle.

 

[disorganizer]

After having a walk through my city bavaria, i noticed some unhappyness.
Thanks to our fine military troops, we can still maintain our citizens in a peaceful state.

But for how long?

In fact, we will need a minimum of 2 garrisoned troops in the city to keep them happy and prevent them from rioting.

Citizen Moods:
1 Happy
2 Content
1 Unhappy

So if we only had 1 garrisoned unit, we would loose 1 moderate citizen to the unhappy and the city would riot.


I read somewhere where that there are tendencies to moove one of our troops out of the city. This would be bad. I hope nobody tries this moove.

Your
Disorganizer
Lord Mayor of Bavaria

 

[Cyc]

Hey Dis. Have you noticed that the Lux Slider is on 0%. By moving it to 10% will not affect a change in our income that would negate the protection of the new Settler (as I outlined in the discussion).

 

[Plexus]

Originally posted by neutral leader
frankly, i dont know how the settler got in there either. i didnt put it there. saam has already beaten me to posting tc instructions (he seems to have little faith in me, then again that may be understandable). i would request though that in compliance with my post in the domestic ministry the second settler at valhalla be changed to a worker. thank you all for bearing with me through my partial absenteeism lately, real life has been rough. i will be here more from now on.

important: please note that as great igunaman has not been heard from in his capacity as mayor since the tenth, i am hereby discharging him of his duties and appointing plexus, as he had also been a mayoral applicant. unless there are any objections, this decision will take effect immediately.

how long have i been a mayor? lol

BTW: Congrats on your new position, Cyc.

 

[disorganizer]

well, i still would like to conquer octavian in a election poll for morgana mayorship

 

[Cyc]

As of now these are the proposed build queues of the cities of Fanatika:

Bavaria: Sword (c), Sword, Sword, Sword
Valhalla: Settler (c), Spearman, Worker, Settler
Morgana: Sword (c), Sword/Worker, Sword, Sword
Kuhkaff: Settler(c), Settler, Settler
Tlaxcala: Spearman (c), Worker, Barracks, Archer

In Morgana, as explained in the last discussion, a Sword will be started after the completion of the current Sword. This will be done to carry the production beyond the next growth cycle. Once Morgana has grown to the next pop level, then the Sword should be switched to a Worker immediately. Then after the Worker is created, we return to Swords.

I've switched Kuhkaff to 3 Settler in a row, instead of 2 Settlers and a Barracks. I feel the extra Settler will be needed.

 

[Plexus]

I disagree with this 3 settler stack, I propose, Settler, Settler, Temple, Settler

 

[Shaitan]

There are many more settlers queued than spearmen. How will our new cities be defended?

 

[disorganizer]

I am for alternating settler-spearmens in KuhKaff and Valhalla.

 

[Cyc]

First thing I want to say is thank you very much for responding so quickly to the proposed build queues.

 

[eyrei]

It doesn't appear that Kuhkaff is growing fast enough to build that settler on time. Maybe we should build a spearman or swordsman first?

 

[Cyc]

Still in the wake of the monumental passage of this law , the Governor's Office wishes to make a Public Announcement.

October 24th is proclaimed a Holiday in the Province of Bohemia.

We hope you enjoyed your Holiday!

 

[Shaitan]

I would like to volunteer to be the Deputy Governor of Bohemia. The recent rule change allows mods to hold any office so I am now legally permitted to do so.

I feel my skills at analysis and experience as both a builder player and warmongerer at Emperor and Diety level will be of great benefit to the province.

 

[Cyc]

The Governors Office would like to make the following Public Announcement -

We have been honored here today at the Governor's Mansion by the offer of services from Lord Shaitan as Deputy Governor. We whole-heartedly accept and hereby proclaim Lord Shaitan as the new Deputy Governor of Bohemia. Welcome to Capital Hill.

 

[Cyc]

Because of the swift response to the posting of the proposed build queues, I have updated them to try and accomodate some of the requests. Here now is the update:

Bavaria - Sword (c), Spear, Sword, Sword
Valhalla - Settler (c), Spear, Worker, Settler
Morgana - Sword (c), Sword/Worker, Sword, Sword
Kuhkaff - Settler (c), Spear, Settler, Spear
Tlaxcala - Spear (c), Worker, Barracks, Archer

In reviewing the save, in light of the above comments, I found the following points worth mentioning:

eyrei - Because of the growth of food and production in Kuhkaff, the projected completion date of the Settler will be 7 turns. This should fit well with the Spear being trained in Valhalla.

Because I supplied the Military with an additional Warrior (per Dis' request) and because of the current requests for Spearman protection of our Settlers, I have inserted a Spearman into Bavaria's queue. This Spearman will protect the Settler coming from Valhalla in four turns.

@Dis and Shaitan - As you can see in the paragraph above, I have increased the Spear production to supply proper protection of our Settlers.

@Plexus - You'll be happy to see that Kuhkaff is no longer a stack of three Settlers, but a temple will not bring the growth results we desire. When the borders expand, nothing of great value will be secured. On the other hand if we place our next city between the game and the cattle South of Bavaria, border expansion will reap an extra game tile. If we place the following city in the site I have proposed, border expansion will gain the gold and the spice. Therefore, I feel Temples would be better placed in one or both of these two cities.

I don't think I have to run through the Sword/Worker deal in Morgana for the third time.

 

[disorganizer]

i second your proposals my governor.
i again want to point out i would like to become mayor of morgana instead of lord mayor of bavaria.
how do we resolv the resulting conflict?