Originally posted by Strider
Ouch.... How major was it? Hopefully you didn't get your brains screwed up. You tend to be a good source of reliable information and good advice.
Yes, it's a viable strategy but the people were not happy with the price tag. If you feel you can drum up enough support to debate this again I'd be happy to repoll the populace.Originally posted by disorganizer
would it make sense to make peace with babylon to destroy their reputation with the other civs?
i believe the others will then come to the peace table very easy since bab broke the pact. and we could deny peace for america to capture their cities (and we could concentrate on this one without having to split our forces!)
Originally posted by disorganizer
would it make sense to make peace with babylon to destroy their reputation with the other civs?
i believe the others will then come to the peace table very easy since bab broke the pact. and we could deny peace for america to capture their cities (and we could concentrate on this one without having to split our forces!)
Originally posted by Falcon02
Well, it seems like most people agree with a peace treaty after Washington. But, Honestly I would rather not get Houston in the Negotiations. It's not in the right place.
We already have soldiers nearby ready to take Houston and clear out the Barbs. Houston will auto-raze, and we can settle in the spot we wanted. And this will be without violating our No Razing policy, since we couldn't take it over even if we wanted to.