The European Project: the future of the EU.

No one believes they can take over the French media like they did the English (language), do they ?

La pensée unique ? Every Frenchman is too full of himself to even consider to be locked into such a false dichotomy.

Only works for political imbeciles.

Oligarchs already took over the french media. Not totally, but let's not pretend that european countries have been immune to that american-induced phenomenon. Their "big tech" monooplizing advertisement revenues killed the media's revenue model and they now depend on financing that only oligarchs provide at scale. There are pockes of independent media but they lack scale
 
Media that lacks an audience and produces trash shouldn't be handed taxpayers money...and with this I mean bailouts/handouts to private media that also have the pernicious effect of "buying less hostile journalism" towards the government in place.
State media is fine and should remain public funded.
 
A significant part of our media is owned by far right activist billionaires that actively push far right consipracy theories, with another significant part being owned by neo liberal billionaires who use them to actively push for their own interest. Basically the only TV channels that are not actively pushing for far right or neo liberal ideas are the public TV channels (and Macron has pushed them towards that during his term so they're already halfway there). Le Pen intends to dismantle public TV if she ever gets near power.
 
A significant part of our media is owned by far right activist billionaires that actively push far right consipracy theories, with another significant part being owned by neo liberal billionaires who use them to actively push for their own interest. Basically the only TV channels that are not actively pushing for far right or neo liberal ideas are the public TV channels (and Macron has pushed them towards that during his term so they're already halfway there). Le Pen intends to dismantle public TV if she ever gets near power.
In democratic countries like those in the EU, public television networks are always the most neutral and reliable. They always lean somewhat toward the ruling party, of course, but laws and regulations, both in their own country and in the EU, protect journalists and other workers from politically appointed executives, so manipulation is much more complex. Meanwhile, on private networks, executives and CEOs have the right of life and death, and even primae noctis right, over any worker and journalist there. Organizations like the EU are the worst enemy of both billionaires and authoritarians.
 
Last edited:
Obviously

Poland's Sikorski says Europe must prepare for 'deep' Russian strike​

LONDON, Oct 14 (Reuters) - Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski warned on Tuesday Europe must be prepared for Russia to strike deep into the region, calling it "irresponsible" not to build defences such as a "drone wall" on its eastern flank.
In London to unveil an Iranian Shahed-136 drone downed in Ukraine, Sikorski urged European nations to "stay the course" in their support of Ukraine, saying he hoped U.S. President Donald Trump would make long-range Tomahawk missiles available to the country to bolster strikes against Russian infrastructure.
Providing Ukraine with more munitions such as anti-aircraft assets, short-range and medium-range weapons was needed to help protect Europe, he said, pointing to incursions by drones over Poland and fighter jets over Estonia. He said it was not yet known whether drones over Copenhagen were Russian.
Asked about the possibility of expanding an initiative for a "drone wall" to counter future incursions, Sikorski told Reuters Russia could "reach, unfortunately, deep into Europe".
"We should be prepared to counter that, and so I think not to build anti-drone and drone capacity these days would be irresponsible," he said, standing next to the Iranian drone in the house of the British parliament's speaker.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has described as "nonsense" the idea that his country would potentially target a NATO member.
Sikorski, a long-time and strident critic of Putin, urged Europe to also plan to support Ukraine for three more years, a timeframe, he said, Kyiv was also planning for.
"The Ukrainians are planning this war for three years, which is prudent," he said. "And we need to convince Putin that we are ready to stay the course for at least those three years."
 
I agree

Albuquerque calls for the completion of the Banking Union. "Member states must overcome selfish interests"​

Maria Luís Albuquerque believes that the Banking Union will bring benefits to families and businesses and calls on member states to overcome "selfish interests."​


The European Commissioner for Financial Services and Savings Union, Maria Luís Albuquerque, from Portugal, called on member states to overcome "selfish interests" and move forward with the completion of the Banking Union. She believes this will bring tangible benefits to families and businesses, such as cheaper financial services and more accessible financing .

Albuquerque was speaking at the closing of the conference marking the 10th anniversary of the Single Resolution Mechanism, a tool that was “unthinkable” in 2012 and that “required a lot of political will” , but whose achievement gives him hope regarding the objective of “bringing to life” the Savings and Investment Union.

“Just as we achieved success with the Single Resolution Mechanism, our progress now depends on Member States recognizing the tangible benefits of moving beyond self-interest and achieving true European financial integration ,” the former finance minister said.

For Albuquerque, a "true" Banking Union will unlock the "enormous" potential of the European market . "It could allow our banks to operate seamlessly across borders and, in doing so, offer better and cheaper services, and more accessible financing for both families and businesses," she explained.

Maria Luís Albuquerque also considered that, although the banking market has strengthened in recent years , “the Banking Union remains unfinished” and progress towards completing this process would make the sector “even more resilient”.

What is missing to complete the Banking Union?​

Two of the pillars have been implemented, namely the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Single Resolution Mechanism— the latter is now celebrating its tenth anniversary. The third step involves the creation of a European deposit guarantee scheme (the so-called EDIS).

"This is a task that President von der Leyen specifically entrusted to me. This is essential to give citizens and businesses full confidence that their bank deposits are safe, regardless of their location in the Union," the Commissioner explained.

The former Portuguese Finance Minister also said that, as part of her work on the Savings and Investment Union, a comprehensive report on the banking system in the single market will be published next year , which will include an assessment of the sector's competitiveness.

As she explained, this work is part of the European Commission's priority to make Europe more competitive with simpler rules.

First-hand experience with BES​

In her speech, Maria Luís Albuquerque highlighted the most important milestones in the ten years of the Single Resolution Mechanism, created to help banks in crisis and protect taxpayers' money.

And she did not forget the “first-hand” experience with the crisis at BES a year earlier – resolved through the Portuguese Resolution Fund at a cost that, including Novobanco, reached more than eight billion for the State (although it is expected that it will be reimbursed in the coming decades).

"As Finance Minister during the turbulent years of the eurozone and the sovereign debt crisis, I experienced firsthand what it meant to resolve a bank without harmonized tools to manage bankruptcies in an orderly manner . That's why, for me, today's anniversary represents an opportunity to highlight real progress, lessons learned, and the real stability achieved," she said.

Regarding the creation of the Single Resolution Mechanism, Maria Luís Albuquerque recalls that it was far from a peaceful process. "It was highly political and contentious, and it had to be handled carefully to ensure that the result would be effective in practice," she recalled.

She also highlighted the creation of the Single Resolution Fund , a powerful financial backstop with approximately €80 billion financed by the financial sector to protect taxpayers in future bailouts. "By building a shared and mutualized fund, it represents a profound step forward in trust and solidarity," he emphasized.

She also highlighted the resolution applied to Banco Popular in 2017, “the first orderly resolution of a major European bank without a public bailout” which “sent a powerful message of stability and confidence” by demonstrating that the “vicious cycle” between banks and Member States had been broken.

*The journalist traveled to Brussels at the invitation of the Single Resolution Council
 
Media that lacks an audience and produces trash shouldn't be handed taxpayers money...and with this I mean bailouts/handouts to private media that also have the pernicious effect of "buying less hostile journalism" towards the government in place.
State media is fine and should remain public funded.
Artistic media should also be public funded, and Ireland has taken a big step towards that:

Three Years After Trial Launch, Ireland Is Making Basic Income for Artists Program Permanent

Several years after launching a trial, Ireland is set to make its basic income for artists program permanent starting in 2026.

Under the program, selected artists receive a weekly payment of approximately $375, or about $1,500 per month. There are 2,000 spots available, with applications set to open in September 2026; eligibility criteria have not yet been announced. The government may expand the program to additional applicants in the future, should more funding become available, according to Irish broadcaster RTÉ.

The announcement follows the release of an external report by UK-based consultants Alma Economics, which found that the pilot cost €72 million to date but generated nearly €80 million in total benefits to the Irish economy. The report also found that recipients’ arts-related income increased by more than €500 per month on average, income from non-arts work decreased by around €280, and reliance on other social programs declined, with participants receiving €100 less per month on average.

“The economic return on this investment in Ireland’s artists and creative arts workers is having an immediate positive impact on the sector and the economy overall,” Patrick O’Donovan, minister for culture, communications, and sport, said in a statement.
 
Last edited:
I am not big on arts being public funded. If an art product doesn't garner any/enough audience to "fund" itself then I don't think taxpayers money should be wasted on it.
I approve that we should be spending a minimum to keep national art and specially culture "products" that are understood/appreciated by the public at large.
I don't approve of public spending for artists and cultural agents that produce something only they and a little elite are willing to appreciate/pay the ticket.
So when a political inclination quiz asks me if I would agree with public spending to save a struggling private art school I always answer no. Spend that money on welfare!
 
Or induce people on welfare to produce art :)


1760603885483.png

What is art? What is creativity? The definitions here are different from one article to another. Some projects aim to create social change, improve employability, strengthen social inclusion, or build advocacy to change public perception around exclusion. Others are based on arts and creativity as ways to decompartmentalize approaches and support practices, to introduce horizontal modes of support, and to empower people by simply proving that they can be artists and creators.
 
Last edited:
After 6 years (!) of investigation, a landmark legal action has been filed before the International Criminal Court.

Yesterday, ICC Counsels Dr. Omer Shatz (front-LEX) and Dr. Juan Branco have submitted a 700-page legal brief to the International Criminal Court, exposing the involvement of 122 European Union and Member State officials in crimes against humanity committed against migrants on the Central Mediterranean route (2014–2020).

Between 2015 and 2025, more than 25,000 civilians were killed by drowning on the Central Mediterranean route. Around 150,000 survivors were abducted, forcibly transferred to Libya, and subjected to imprisonment, torture, rape, and enslavement in detention facilities described by a German diplomat in a confidential cable to Chancellor Angela Merkel as “concentration camps”.

In 2017, the ICC Prosecutor reported to the UN Security Council (UNSC) that “serious and widespread” Crimes Against Humanity – including killings, rape, and torture – were being committed against “thousands of vulnerable migrants, including women and children.” The Prosecutor indicated that the Office was considering “opening an investigation into migrant-related crimes,” stressing: “We must act.” Since 2017, every year the ICC Prosecutor reports to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) on ongoing crimes against migrants.

In 2019, ICC Counsels Dr. Omer Shatz and Dr. Juan Branco submitted a Communication under Article 15 of the Rome Statute to the Prosecutor. The 245-page case provided substantial evidence demonstrating that widespread, systematic, and ongoing crimes against ‘migrants’ were being committed pursuant to EU policies on the Central Mediterranean route, whose objective was to prevent asylum seekers from reaching European shores at all costs.

The First Communication
legally substantiated two deterrence-based policies pursuant to which the crimes were committed. The first was a policy of mass killings by drowning, marked by the termination of Operation Mare Nostrum and its replacement with Frontex’s Operation Triton in 2014, constituting the crime against humanity of murder. Civil society organizations sought to fill the lethal gap internationally created by the EU. In response, the EU adopted a second policy of mass refoulement by proxy, marked by the conclusion of the Italian-Libyan Memorandum of Understanding and the EU’s Malta Declaration in 2017, which led to the reconstruction and contracting of the so-called “Libyan Coast Guard.” Pursuant to this second policy, the Crimes Against Humanity of deportation, enforced disappearance, murder, torture, rape, enslavement, imprisonment, and other inhumane acts were directed against the targeted civilian population.

In 2020, the Prosecutor confirmed to the European Parliament that the case is under review, and later that year notified the undersigned of her decision to admit the case as part of the Situation in Libya. The admission of the case, a rare occurrence, reflects that the Office of the Prosecutor considered to have jurisdiction and that there was a reasonable basis to believe the alleged crimes were committed.

In 2023, a UN Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) mandated by the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) determined that EU and Member State officials are participating in crimes against humanity against migrants on the Central Mediterranean route, corroborating the allegations in the present case.

A year before, in 2022, the Prosecutor had joined a “Task Force” mandated to investigate crimes against humanity against ‘migrants’. Yet the members of the Prosecutor’s “Task Force” include the EU and Italy, namely the alleged co-perpetrators in the case submitted to the Prosecutor.

In 2025, the ICC issued its first arrest warrant against a person suspected of committing crimes against humanity against ‘migrants’: a Libyan national known as ‘Al-Masri’. AL-Masri was arrested in Italy, but instead of surrendering him to The Hague, however, the Italian government – a member of the Prosecutor’s Task Force whose leaders are key suspects in this case – smuggled him back to Libya on a government plane, where he remains at large.

The undersigned submitted a Communication to the Office of the Prosecutor in the Al-Masri case, alleging that several Italian Ministers committed offenses against the administration of justice and requesting their prosecution pursuant to Article 70 of the Rome Statute. In Italy, the Tribunal of Ministers has already corroborated these allegations, decided to prosecute some of the implicated officials, and requested the lifting of their immunities. But the ICC Prosecutor remains idle.

The ICC investigation in Libya was launched in 2011. It has not led to any trial so far. According to the ICC Prosecutor, crimes against ‘migrants’ under his jurisdiction are still ongoing. According to the ICC Prosecutor, the perpetrators are at large. Yet the ICC Prosecutor reported the UN Security Council of his intention to close the investigations into the Situation in Libya by 2026.
 
Few days ago a Picasso was 'lost' while being transported from El Prado museum to Granada.
LLDHUG7I55EAHIPIOIP7XGX7NA.jpg

Not a big loss if you ask me.
 
Former french President starts gaol sentence today


Nicolas Sarkozy has become the first French ex-president to go to jail,
as he starts a five-year sentence for conspiring to fund his election
campaign with money from late Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi.

Not since World War Two Nazi collaborationist leader Philippe Pétain was
jailed for treason in 1945 has any French ex-leader gone behind bars.
 
USA, take note. That's how you deal with Presidents who break the law.
(though it's still a disgrace how many people are acting as if it's a tragedy rather than rejoicing in justice being applied)
 
I always found Sarkovsky annoyingly sarcastic.

Looking forward to seeing some UK Prime Ministers in gaol.

But I doubt that I will live that long.
 
USA, take note. That's how you deal with Presidents who break the law.
(though it's still a disgrace how many people are acting as if it's a tragedy rather than rejoicing in justice being applied)
Cries as in justice system only now managed to put on trial an 11 year old case against former socialist PM José Sócrates.:cry:
 
3 men robbed the Louvre!



So the theft is valued at about $100 million U.S. dollars.


PARIS (AP) — The Paris prosecutor said Tuesday that crown jewels stolen in a dramatic weekend Louvre heist were worth an estimated 88 million euros ($102 million), but that the monetary estimate doesn’t include their historical value to France.

Prosecutor Laure Beccuau, whose office is leading the investigation, said about 100 investigators are now involved in the police hunt for the suspects and gems after Sunday’s theft from the world’s most-visited museum.

“The wrongdoers who took these gems won’t earn 88 million euros if they had the very bad idea of disassembling these jewels,″ she said in an interview with broadcaster RTL. ″We can perhaps hope that they’ll think about this and won’t destroy these jewels without rhyme or reason.″

Hope is not a good strategy, but unless the 100 investigators find something, that's all they got.


I'm 90% sure this picture of 1 of the 100 investigators is AI. :lol:
Feel the Frenchness.

Spoiler :



And here is the original it might have been taken from.
Spoiler :



People having fun with the freaking AI are getting too good. :crazyeye:
 
Back
Top Bottom