BkGreatWarnut
aka "Brian the Great"
Use the MP Version...TGW Div Multiplayer 1.0...I don't think a new version has been released yet...
BkGreatWarnut said:Use the MP Version...TGW Div Multiplayer 1.0...I don't think a new version has been released yet...
Michael II said:end of week 42 1914
I conquered England, Scotland and Wales. Ireland will follow.
The strange thing is that I was able to transport my siege guns to England, but I couldn't transport Artillery 210 mm.
And there is a destroyer bug: The AI is able to make bombardement with their destroyers, but I'm not![]()
I don't really know what some buildings are good for:
Barracks
Mass Production Center
Port
Major Port
Bombshelters
I thought they would propably work the same as in original C3C, but I saw that a cities production didn't increase after building the mass production center. And the Barracks don't produce veteran units, so I decided to ask what those buildings are good for.
Sorry for asking so many questions![]()
Rocoteh said:Important message:
In a PM to me Thunderfall confirms that "long threads"
soon will be closed.
I find this unacceptable!
If Sarevok share my opinion I think TGW shall not restart from schratch if the CFC-staff choose to close it!
Thus the CFC-staff is 100% responsible if they kill the most
popular scenario ever released here.
Rocoteh
Adler17 said:I think it is indeed unacceptable. Is there any solution, a possibility? I mean such good scenarios and mods need long threads. Is there a possibility to cut the first 500 posts or so into a kind of archive (without download pages of course)? If this isn´t possible CFC makes a self destruction.
Adler
And burning it will create firestorm that I will do my best to feed until there is nothing left of the scenario creation business.CellKu said:I don't see the point in closing highly active threads either. There are a lot of old threads that no one looks into anymore. Why do they choose a size criterion instead of a time/attractiveness criterion for closing threads? This thread has been among the top threads during the last weeks (not to mention all the time of its existence!!). So, I would think they must see that there is still a lot of interest in this thread.
CellKu
Michael II said:I discovered this thread 2 month's ago and so I'm not really a "longtime user", but I decided to join this forum only because I was so much impressed by this great work of Sarevok and Rocoteh. For me it would be some kind of "abuse of art" to close this thread. I would lose my respect for this forum if such an action would happen.
I hope the responsible persons will understand that this plan is a mistake.
You have my full support, cause it would be an enormous loss to see all your work dying.
sincerely, a fan![]()
BkGreatWarnut said:How about closing threads that have not been active for 2 or more months??? This is close to the amount of time that goes along with lack of interest. I know there are several PBEM games as well as scenarios (one of mine) that are no longer active and haven't been since almost october...
Look through and delete all those annoying, not used ones and that will save a lot of space or whatever it is called...
2 months is a pretty good number for that...
rbis4rbb said:Sorry for the noob question, but where do I download the art files to?