Angst
Rambling and inconsistent
What you're listing as reasons are not nationalist reasons, you are aware of that, right?
No. They fought to speak in Catalan because most knew no other language. And because they hated more the centralist Bourbon (who suppressed all Catalan liberties, as said before) than the Hapsburg candidate which would have most probably maintained the the personal union status. If only the Allies had maintained their promise to keep Catalan liberties...
thus maintaining a balance of power
Did I ever say it was about Catalan liberties? That was the reason why the territories of the former Crown of Aragon supported the Hapsburg, it's all I'm saying (Catalan in the case of Catalonia, Aragonese for Aragon, etc.).With all due respect, the War of the Spanish Succession had everything to do with limiting the megalomanaical designs of Louis XIV in Italy, the Netherlands and (through it's ally Bavaria) the HRE as well as Spain, thus maintaining a balance of power in Europe (Something it did very well), and little or nothing to do with Catalan liberties.
Incompetent officials everywhere!Besides, the Spanish front was more or less unwinnable and pouring more men and resources there was akin to throwing them away to attrition, heatstroke, disease and the like- siphoning them from fronts that were winnable, such as in the Spanish Netherlands.
I think Spain has always had one problem. And that problem is called Castille. Spain was, what, a loose federation of kingdoms under one monarch? But that's how they called the resulting entity, Spain, and somehow the people and the nobility extended their views of their lands to the whole of it. Since the Crown of Aragon had always been basically the same thing that was now Spain, it was in the traditionally much more nobility-controlled, monarch-led Castille that problems aroused. Why? Because the monarchs had their capital there, being the largest and most populated kingdom, and eventually they came to have a Castillian-like mentality, and tried to homogenise the whole of Spain into Castille. That's always been the problem.That's not to say that the Treaty of Utrecht was anything but an astounding show of bad faith on our part to all concerned (especially the Dutch) but there was nothing to be done for Catalonia; the rest of Spain would not accept Archduke Charles, or a partition of Spanish territories any kind, even if France forced the issue, so it was either let the Catalans down, or continue a war that couldn't be won and that had already lasted for over a decade. Sorry. It had to be done.
What are you trying to do here buddy?
>implying there ever was a true balance of power.
I think Spain has always had one problem. And that problem is called Castille. Spain was, what, a loose federation of kingdoms under one monarch? But that's how they called the resulting entity, Spain, and somehow the people and the nobility extended their views of their lands to the whole of it. Since the Crown of Aragon had always been basically the same thing that was now Spain, it was in the traditionally much more nobility-controlled, monarch-led Castille that problems aroused. Why? Because the monarchs had their capital there, being the largest and most populated kingdom, and eventually they came to have a Castillian-like mentality, and tried to homogenise the whole of Spain into Castille. That's always been the problem.
Still if anyone needed knocking down a peg or two it was Louis XIV
Catalonia will never be independent
Hahaha nationalists are cute. Protodiplomacy!