The Most Important Year in History

Whomp

Keep Calm and Carry On
Retired Moderator
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
18,200
Location
Chicago
From the article in More Intelligent Life Magazine
http://www.moreintelligentlife.com/story/what-was-most-important-year-ever

What was the most important year in human history? How we answer it says a lot about who we are.
The author of the article believes 1776
Christians might go for the birth of Christ, or his crucifixion (though would have to agree a year for each first) and Muslims, the Prophet’s migration to Medina in 622AD. For English patriots it might be Alfred’s defeat of the Vikings in 878, while Marxists could vote for the publication of “Das Kapital” in 1867.

But my contention would be that we are looking for a universally important year. In the absence of a truly universal religion, that would rule out a religious moment. In almost every case it rules out a national date too. One can argue that the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588 was crucial to the world--no independent England, no Britain, no British empire, a world of difference. But that requires too much speculative spooling forward to be convincing.

So what about years which saw an event which affected many countries and peoples? If you introduce that thought, you bring the most significant year nearer to modern times. For the basic facts of travel and the transmission of ideas mean that the further back you go—unless you play games with the dawn of humanity—the less universal the choice is likely to be. There are plenty of key dates for classical times but when Caesar was killed in 44BC, even his empire was just a wobbly circumference in one small part of the world. If you scroll forward to 1453 and the fall of Constantinople, certainly a momentous year for Christendom, it’s hard to argue that anyone noticed or cared about it in China, Japan or Africa.

We could, it’s true, try to find a year during which a large number of different events happened. In 1492, Christopher Columbus bumped into the Americas; the last Muslim ruler of Spain surrendered; Sonni Ali, who founded Africa’s vast Songhai empire, died; and the arts were taken to new heights by Mitsunobu Toba in Japan and Leonardo and Mantegna in Italy. It was also a big year for the Poles and the Lithuanians. Yet somehow, that’s all a bit…bitty. Columbus apart, these coincidence years are lacking in thwack.

Another approach is to say that since mankind is driven by ideas we should be looking for intellectual turning points. This is to assert the primacy of cause over mere events. The trouble is that few great ideas have a single source. We have had a lot of fun with the 150th anniversary of Darwin’s “Origin”, but 1859 wasn’t his eureka year.

Or take political liberalism, still just about the dominant political idea now. Do you choose a book by Locke from the 1690s, or one of the Enlightenment heroes, or 1776 and the American Declaration of Independence, or the more all-embracing Declaration of the Rights of Man in Paris in 1789? If you go for the books, there are too many; if you go for Paris, then how do you deal with the world-sized irony of the approaching Terror?

Even as economic power, thanks to our great crash, seems to be moving East, the world is still dominated by the American example, and so 1776 is the most persuasive of these liberal moments. Unlike Magna Carta (Intelligent Life, spring 2009) or Britain’s Glorious Revolution of 1688, the formation of the United States has touched most people alive in one way or another. It’s certainly on my shortlist. It nudges out 1919, when so much of the political world we live in emerged from the disastrous Versailles treaty—mainly because 1919 depends on 1914, so that’s two years, not one.

But alongside 1776, we must include 1945. The atomic bombs alone changed the world’s sense of itself, never mind the final defeat of Nazi Germany, whose attempted genocide of the Jewish people remains the single most important moral fact of modern times, the one that has done most to change the way we think. It was the year when American hegemony in the West was established and when the long Stalinist bondage of eastern Europe began, and when India took decisive steps towards independence. If there was a year in which events overtook causes, from India and China to the Middle East, this surely was it. Later epochal moments—the fall of the Berlin wall in 1989, Mandela’s release in 1990, the discovery of DNA in 1953—are big, but not quite as big.

I have a final candidate. If humanity is most threatened by global warming and if it requires urgent international action, then is not the Copenhagen summit quite close to being our last real chance to take it? Some people, I know, choke on both ifs. But 2009 is my third candidate.
Besides the declaration of independence of the US, it also saw the publication of Adam Smith's "The Wealth of Nations".

Other writers for the magazine include:
1439
Spoiler :
This is the year—as near as one can say—when Johannes Gutenberg, in his workshop in Mainz, first set movable metal types in a wooden frame, blacked them with ink from a roller, and saw them make words on a sheet of paper. No other single action has been so influential. A spoken word, even from the mouth of the greatest ruler, prophet or sage, dissolves into the air. Words that are printed survive, thrive and multiply.

Since 1439 words printed by Gutenberg’s process have driven every invention, change of thinking and political idea. And in Gutenberg’s type—if not in our uniform, lifeless electronic fonts—words also contain light and shade, and dance.

The same year that saw this inky, clumsy birth also saw the death of Richard Beauchamp, Earl of Warwick: warrior, pilgrim and tutor of the child-king Henry VI. His gilt-bronze effigy, in full armour, lies in St Mary’s church in Warwick. His eyes are open, and he raises his hands to the stained glass window above him, where the Virgin waits to receive him into Heaven at the Last Judgment.

That whole structure of certainty, hierarchy and faith, the closed medieval universe, was never more efficiently blown open than by the careful placing, many miles away, of little squares of metal in a press; even if printing the Bible was the first thing Gutenberg thought he would do.


1944
Spoiler :
This was the transformative year of the modern era, when the world was recast by events and by ideas. The hegemony of European imperial powers gave way to a new world order of opposing blocks based on ideology. The new power of America led the liberation of old Europe, eclipsing any lingering pretensions to world leadership held by the weary titan, Britain. Soviet Russia, advancing on Nazi Germany from the east, affirmed its own intentions to rule eastern Europe; by the end of the year, the cold war was on. That was to dominate world history for the next 45 years—some argue it still does.

The Bretton Woods conference in July set up the pillars of the modern economic, financial and trading system: the IMF and the World Bank. Talks began on setting up the United Nations.

The Holocaust continued remorselessly; the worst crime in history killed millions this year. That led eventually to the founding of the state of Israel in 1948 and the confrontation with the Arab world that followed—and still continues.

There was also an intellectual rebellion against the habits of thinking that had prevailed since the age of enlightenment, which had led, so the critics believed, to the Holocaust and Fascism in general. Two books published in 1944 encapsulated this rebellion: “Dialectic of Enlightenment” by Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer, and “The Road to Serfdom” by Friedrich Hayek. The first inspired the post-modernist philosophy that would change societies so much in the 1960s and 1970s; the second, the intellectual revival led by Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. Despite the credit crunch, we still live in a world moulded by those two seminal works.


1791
Spoiler :
It was the year Claude Chappe and his brothers first demonstrated their new invention for sending messages rapidly over long distances, using a system of telescopes and movable panels mounted on towers. For the first time information could be transmitted faster than a letter could be carried by horse or ship. Chappe’s invention, the “télégraphe”, was swiftly adopted by the French state, which built a nationwide network.

1791 also saw the birth of Samuel Morse, the American artist and inventor who developed an improved version of the telegraph based on sending electrical impulses along wires. The telegraph transformed commerce, politics and social relations, as did its successors: the telephone, the telex, and eventually the internet and mobile phones. More than half the world’s population now has a mobile. The process of building a global telecommunications network linking everyone on earth, which seems likely to be completed in the next few years, began in 1791. It has changed the world.

The most important year in history is both easy to identify and hard to pinpoint. Easy to identify because we use it to divide our calendar into “before” and “after”. Hard to pinpoint because there is some confusion about whether we got the calendar right.


Christ's birth
Spoiler :
You do not have to be a believer (and the author of this article is not) to recognise that Jesus’s birth was the most important event in human history. Jesus inspired the world’s most popular religion and plays an important role in both Judaism and Islam. But he also shaped all subsequent secular history. The Roman Catholic church is the world’s oldest global institution. The Reformation, which helped to inspire individualism and capitalism, was an attempt to return the church to its original purity. The French and Russian revolutions were inspired, in large part, by hatred of the religious establishment. Two thousand years after Jesus’s birth, about 2 billion people, or a third of the world’s population, call themselves Christians.

The frustrating thing is that we cannot pinpoint Jesus’s birth-year exactly. The Christian calendar presumes that it took place in year 1—everything before that is BC. But modern scholars have complicated the picture. The Gospel of Matthew places Jesus’s birth under the reign of Herod the Great, who died in 4BC. The Gospel of Luke says that he was born during the first census of Judea in 6AD. The consensus is that he was born between 6 and 4BC. Let’s call it 5BC for the sake of simplicity—not as clear-cut as some of the other dates suggested, but then the year of Jesus’s birth is such a momentous event that it makes other contenders for the most important year look feeble by comparison.

What other readers said
1848
Spoiler :
year of revolutions, Communist Manifesto, Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo ending the Mexican-American War.


1241
Spoiler :
Year of the death of Ogodei who forced Batu Kahn, who was already in Wien after having conquered Russia, Poland, former Yugoslavia and Hungary, to go back to Mongolia for the election of the successor and in this way he saved Europe from the conquest of the Mongols.


1206
Spoiler :
was a pivotal point, as Temujin was crowned Chingiz Khan, or Universal Ruler. He then proceeded to take over most of Eurasia and even attempted to invade Indonesia and Japan. His empire helped spread the Black Plague and is therefore a legacy each of us carries in our blood. The empire also left an important political legacy throughout Eurasia and the power of the Mongols is physically visible today, as the Great Wall was built to keep them out, while St.Basil's was built to commemorate the defeat of a Mongol successor state.


1962
Spoiler :
Cuban Missile Crisis. Probably the closest we've come to ending the human race and obliterating the entire planet. We passed through our "technological adolescence" without destroying ourselves. Pretty important.


Universally, I'd think 1439 is the most important. The printing press changed everything.

Now, who has a better idea?
 
Let me guess, the author is american?

I say none of those, and that there is no "most important year in history".
 
1914 was the year civilization looked in the mirror and was horrified.
 
Let me guess, the author is american?

I say none of those, and that there is no "most important year in history".
The magazine is British.

Which would you say is most important?
 
The magazine is British.

Which would you say is most important?

March 17th 10492 BC. That is the day Ugg, taught his son Mughei how to make pottery.

The Idea of most important year is so stupid when you are comparing it with the WHOLE of history. It is only logical to start at the very beginning where the step was taken to later encompass all of History's achievements.

The idea of 1776 being the date that is most important is plain vile. 1776 needs the British Empire. The British Empire needs 1588 to survive. For 1588 to happen, you need Martin Luther's 1517. For that to happen you need the establishment of the Roman Catholic Church. For that to happen you need the East-West Schism, and for that you need the Byzantines and for that you need the Romans and for that you need the Greeks and for that... Blah blah blah, you need Ugg teaching Mughei how to make pottery.

The article is pure crap. Contradicting itself.
 
Saying there actually is one absolutely definite "most important year of history" is over-simplifying way too much. As all major events are preceded by something else important which made the former event possible to occur in the first place, as already was stated.

If I absolutely was forced to specify a moment, it's when life, in some form or another, began on this planet.
 
1776 is a pretty good candidate, but surely the significant stuff happened when the Americans won their war of rebellion against Britain. If that hadn't happened, then the Declaration of Independence would be remembered as just a bunch of traitorous rebels making airs and graces for themselves.

Still, while the formation of the US is certainly a very significant development from the point of view the world right now, it is hard to see it as equal in significance to (say) the Mongol conquests or something like that. And personally I would say that the careers of the great religious founders such as Jesus or the Prophet Muhammad have changed the world still more. This is because they have determined not just the ebb and flow of empires but also the way people think. But I don't think you can identify a particular year to which to attribute all that - certainly not the year of Jesus' birth. He didn't do much just be being born. Which, incidentally, was (according to the traditional Christian calendar) in 1 BC, not AD 1. The years are counted from his circumcision, not his birth.

Also, it is absurd to suggest that the planet Earth was in danger of being destroyed during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

aronnax said:
1776 needs the British Empire. The British Empire needs 1588 to survive. For 1588 to happen, you need Martin Luther's 1517.

You lost me. Why does the existence of the British Empire depend upon the Spanish Armada having attempted an invasion? Given that the Armada sailed, it depends upon that invasion having failed, but I don't see why the attempt is necessary. And why the Reformation is necessary for any of that is quite beyond me.
 
It's pointless to look for most important year or most important person or similar things. History is a process so it's like asking which thread in a rope is the most important, or which brick in a wall is the most important.

Though, saying it was 1776 is just :lol:
 
. And why the Reformation is necessary for any of that is quite beyond me.

One of the reasons, or at least an excuse enough for a casus belli, for the war between Spain and England was religion (with the crown of England in protestant hands after Mary I).
 
It doesn't follow from that that the war wouldn't have happened if England had been Catholic. Moreover, Henry VIII's reformation was entirely independent of Luther's; if Luther had never happened, then Henry would still have broken the Church of England away from Rome. It would simply have been an independent Catholic Church (as Henry himself envisioned it) and his advisers would not have taken the opportunity to make liturgical and theological reforms along Lutheran lines. So even without Luther, the English church would probably have been in schism anyway, and the Spanish would have had exactly the same casus belli that they in fact did.

But the important point is that neither the Reformation nor the war seems necessary for the emergence of the British empire, which is what aronnax was claiming.
 
Plotinus said:
But the important point is that neither the Reformation nor the war seems necessary for the emergence of the British empire, which is what aronnax was claiming.

That or the world ending.
 
1976:

A compromise that partially relieves tension between the U.K. and Iceland in the Cod Wars.
 
It doesn't follow from that that the war wouldn't have happened if England had been Catholic. Moreover, Henry VIII's reformation was entirely independent of Luther's; if Luther had never happened, then Henry would still have broken the Church of England away from Rome. It would simply have been an independent Catholic Church (as Henry himself envisioned it) and his advisers would not have taken the opportunity to make liturgical and theological reforms along Lutheran lines. So even without Luther, the English church would probably have been in schism anyway, and the Spanish would have had exactly the same casus belli that they in fact did.

But the important point is that neither the Reformation nor the war seems necessary for the emergence of the British empire, which is what aronnax was claiming.

Additionally, Henry VIII had been given the title "Defender of the Faith" by the Pope for his rebuke of Martin Luther. Ironically Henry was defending marriage as one of the sacraments in his treatise.

Picking one year is hard to do. I think it might be easier to pick an event. Even doing that would be tough. My choice for an event would be the Black Death. It was a world wide event. As a result of the loss of about 30% or so of the world population attitudes about the importance of human life began to change. An individual was more valuable after the plague than before. Bad things still happened and evil did not go away, but the life of the average person, in general, gradually began to improve after the plague. I'm sure that some will have a lot of fun criticizing this assesment, but keep in mind I said, gradually and in general.
 
1492, easily. The year that led to a decline in world population by 1/5, introduction of Old World crops to the Americas and vice versa (the latter of which set up the Industrial Revolution), the setup for the financing of the Hapsburg Empire... You can argue that it would have happened anyway, but that's stupid; history isn't just about events, it's also about the timing of events.
 
I see events like the invention of the printing press and discovery of DNA being universally important and why I chose 1439. I agree with Plotinus that 1776 may have been important in the world we live today but it still doesn't have the impact that 1439 did by changing how we articulate and deliver words. It blew up everything.
 
I'm not interested in a poll. I'm interested in what people think.
 
I was glad the author gave 1945 an honorable mention, as that was my first thought. The Bomb changed the way we look at war and peace in such a way that no previous weapon or mindset could; its pursuit and possession have since defined what it is to be a world power. Although the UN's existence had already been set in motion, its charter was signed that year, and the world's most successful model for international relations began. Of course, the end of WWII and the beginning of the Cold War were not insignificant, either.

I hate to say the "pivotal" year was one so recent, but I think The Bomb and the UN alone have changed the world enough to "win" the honor.
 
Back
Top Bottom