The Official Perfection KOs Creationism Thread Part Four: The Genesis of Ire!

[Masquerouge]

A lot of this evolution explain power comes from and based on the human imagination. As "the little eyeball that could" story. TOE itself really doesn't explain much at all.

You should really say "the little eyeballs that could", given that vision organs have evolved in different forms at least a dozen times.

 

[carlosMM]

As "the little eyeball that could" story.

Shown to be a (rather stupid, I must say) strawman, made up by people with no education in biology (or lying) and no brains (I mean, come on, I could do better in second grade!).

TOE itself really doesn't explain much at all.

So you actually KNOW what it says? Would you mind giving a short, concise definition of evolution? Just so that we know trhat you talk about the same thing......

 

[Perfection]

Shown to be a (rather stupid, I must say) strawman, made up by people with no education in biology (or lying) and no brains (I mean, come on, I could do better in second grade!).

Which accounts are incorrect? I musts know!

Tell me the common misconceptions so I don't sounds like a foo'!

 

[brennan]

Guys, it's Smidlee, save your breath, he won't come back for a month knowing his form *drive-by-post-specialist*

 

[Eran of Arcadia]

But he provides a segue into serious discussions of the theory, which is always good.

 

[brennan]

I say: Creationism is stupid, unprovable, untestable, unfalsifiable, miscellaneous other 'ables.

You counter: You can't prove it wrong

I rebut: This is irrational, you cannot prove your hypothesis why should I have to disprove it (impossible)?

You: I don't care I know it's true.

Can we talk about something else now?

 

[Eran of Arcadia]

Actually, a lot of posts have actually been saying things about evolution.

 

[brennan]

Lemme guess: It violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics, loses information, takes too long, can't explain where life comes from, and my personal fave: there isn't any evidence for it, it's all a big hoax.

Edit: oh, yeah: and it relies on an a priori assumption that God doesn't exist

 

[Swedishguy]

My attatchment shows what I feel about creationism.

 

[Erik Mesoy]

That appears to be, from top left:
A two-headed mutant, the Pope looking ashamed or unhappy, a starving child, a set of lips, a dead person; a rocket, a warehouse, a TV broadcast, hundreds of Muslims praying, a red-lighted ritual of some sort, an orchestra; a nuke, a man with a big hat seen from above, and a tank.

I don't understand.

 

[The Last Conformist]

The two-headed child is more likely an example of a developmental anomaly than of mutation. That said, I don't get it either.

 

[Chandrasekhar]

The two-headed child is more likely an example of a developmental anomaly than of mutation. That said, I don't get it either.

Probably saying that God wouldn't do that. More of an argument against God than against Creationism, I think.

 

[warpus]

The two-headed child is more likely an example of a developmental anomaly than of mutation. That said, I don't get it either.

If you saw a two headed child you wouldn't attribute it to a mutation?

 

[The Last Conformist]

If you saw a two headed child you wouldn't attribute it to a mutation?

No. How is this not completely obvious from my previous post?

 

[warpus]

No. How is this not completely obvious from my previous post?

I'm just wondering what your definition of mutation is then...

 

[The Last Conformist]

A mutation is a change to someone's genetic make-up. As far as I am aware, no other definition is in use outside superhero comics and the like.

 

[Eran of Arcadia]

"In the name of God" seems to be saying not that God caused it but that it was done by someone trying to follow God.

Like how all wars are blamed on religion; I have to say this is the first time I have seen the atomic bomb blamed on religion though. Way to stay rational, hyperatheists!

 

[GenMarshall]

That appears to be, from top left:
A two-headed mutant, the Pope looking ashamed or unhappy, a starving child, a set of lips, a dead person; a rocket, a warehouse, a TV broadcast, hundreds of Muslims praying, a red-lighted ritual of some sort, an orchestra; a nuke, a man with a big hat seen from above, and a tank.

I don't understand.

Its just more ways that Atheists like to bash religion in a irrational way.

 

[Gogf]

Its just more ways that Atheists like to bash religion in a irrational way.

How does his image bash religion, exactly?

 

[Perfection]

This is not about religion bashing. Please stay on topics.