I'd rather not as you're just collateral damage. I made the point I wanted, and it wasn't to attack theists, especially not theists who seek a happy compromise between science and religion.
In fact, to be more specific, the very last thing I would want is to discourage any rational that lends support to the vast majority of Christians who are pretty much science-friendly.
Maybe I should just say this: Scientifically, there is no reason to introduce a force that can't even theoretically be tested for in the first place. But that's neither here nor there, and it doesn't necessarily disrupt the scientific process to assume a creator anyway. And then, just because something is not scientific does not make it untrue.
Peace.