Gah, are you leaning more towards this next update being IT das? My decision on who to be will be heavily influenced by it, I liked fuedal warfare in BT times, not so much in IT
An enlightened and generally well-off republic with mercantile and scientific leanings. In other words, what little you sent to me as "orders" for this turn.
I liked fuedal warfare in BT times, not so much in IT
Which one? There are several Hessonian successor-states, you know. Though all of them have some variations on strict disciplinne, militarism and imperialism.
Which one? There are several Hessonian successor-states, you know. Though all of them have some variations on strict disciplinne, militarism and imperialism.
I already posted the (not quite standard, but I'm not sure if I DO have a standard rule set, seeing as I change it every time) ruleset on the preview thread. Look it up.
Das, anyway you can make a list of nations that are npc?
Bah, this sort of slows down my plans (one more BT was what I needed to help unite Tigranism), but I'll make it publicly known I'm sticking with "Caerix".
It still pains me to say it .
Could someone perchance make a named map? It would be loverly. Religious and ethnic somewhere down the line would be nice too. I might even make one myself if Das is up to the task of answering a constant flurry of questions .
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.