This side of the pond it's just about being wrong in the facts you assert. Harm goes to damages but is de jure irrelevant to the case at hand. Hence lots of litigation cases where the damages are irrelivant but the point is demand an apology or put the facts before the court with the looser, generally, to pay the costs. Say £5k damages and £250k costs. Piss the Judge off enough and he might not award costs if he were to feel a company was using its resources to bully some total irrelevance, but you'ld have to work at being a dick.
And that is a prime reason why Britain is an inferior country.