Timsup2nothin
Deity
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2013
- Messages
- 46,737
While Apple spins a convincing tale that any technology that is more than six months old requires immediate replacement, the military has routinely proven otherwise.
I think the paper is "Could Solar Radiation Pressure Explain 'Oumuamua's Peculiar Acceleration?" I cannot usefully read it.Well it is certainly plausible and I lamented at the time we lacked the ability to go find out for ourselves with a probe. Unfortunately the article doesn't give enough detail to make a serious assessment of the claims. It also fails to link to the journal publication as well. It links to the journal's website but not the paper in question and it doesn't give the paper's title to search for it (unless I missed it). Unfortunately I have to go to work and can't go digging on google for it.
I think the paper is "Could Solar Radiation Pressure Explain 'Oumuamua's Peculiar Acceleration?" I cannot usefully read it.
And: who the hell uses CGS units these days?
A clue to the immediate prospects of orbital fuel depots transferring tons of cyrogenic propellants to a line of waiting spacecraft.
Spoiler: there are NO immediate prospects of that happening. Since NewSpace fans quote it as dogma you would think it is ready to roll out. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Another scam cooked up long ago by the Musk Mob to make the Super Heavy Lift Vehicle seem unnecessary.
Hyping the falcon as good for something other than what it is- a satellite launcher- is one of the worst things that has ever happened to space exploration. The myth that small rockets can be pulled up to a gas pump in space has helped stall any progress for close to a decade
Ack-Ack-AckAckAck said:“Mars will no longer accept the constant violation of our proud patriot heritage by small-skull zealot explorers from Earth. We have watched with much patience as you have spent decades probing our weaknesses and resources with lander after lander. First the Viking landers, all the way to today’s probe.”
“Your probes will eventually steal our jobs, they will rape our landscape, they bring microbes and viruses into our atmosphere. Some of them are good probes, I assume, but most of them are very, very, very bad probes.”
.....
“Besides, tell your Yankee leader that we do not accept his kind on Mars. We are a red planet and not an orange one.”
I'm kind of ignoring the material of the rings for energy uses. I do not see a practical way to get energy out of the boulders themselves, I only see them as an obstacle to avoid.
But being in the gravity well (where the rings are), would allow you to use elecrromagnetic tethers to generate huge energies from the planet's magnetosphere.
The space shuttle did this once and the tether generated so much current that it melted and snapped in half.
The space tether experiment, a joint venture of the US and Italy, called for a scientific payload--a large, spherical satellite--to be deployed from the US space shuttle at the end of a conducting cable (tether) 20 km (12.5 miles) long. The idea was to let the shuttle drag the tether across the Earth's magnetic field, producing one part of a dynamo circuit. The return current, from the shuttle to the payload, would flow in the Earth's ionosphere, which also conducted electricity, even though not as well as the wire.
One purpose of such a set-up might be to produce electric power, generating current to run equipment aboard the space shuttle. That electric comes at a price: it is taken away from the motion energy ("kinetic energy") of the shuttle, since the magnetic force on the tether opposes the motion and slows it down. In principle, it should also be possible to reverse this process: a future space station could use solar cells to produce an electric current, which would be pumped into the tether in the opposite direction, so that the magnetic force would boost the orbital motion and would raise the orbit to a higher altitude.
The first attempt at the tether experiment ended prematurely when problems arose with the deploying mechanism, but the one on February 25, 1996, began as planned, unrolling mile after mile of tether while the observed dynamo current grew at the predicted rate. The deployment was almost complete when the unexpected happened: the tether suddenly broke and its end whipped away into space in great wavy wiggles. The satellite payload at the far end of the tether remained linked by radio and was tracked for a while, but the tether experiment itself was over. It took a considerable amount of detective work to figure out what had happened...
Later vacuum-chamber experiments suggested that the unwinding of the reel uncovered pinholes in the insulation. That in itself would not have caused a major problem, because the ionosphere around the tether, under normal circumstance, was too rarefied to divert much of the current. However, the air trapped in the insulation changed that. As it bubbled out of the pinholes, the high voltage ("electric pressure") of the nearby tether, about 3500 volts, converted it into a plasma (in a way similar to the ignition of a fluorescent tube), a relatively dense one and therefore a much better conductor of electricity.
The instruments aboard the tether satelite showed that this plasma diverted through the pinhole about 1 ampere, a current comparable to that of a 100-watt bulb (but at 3500 volts!), to the metal of the shuttle and from there to the ionospheric return circuit. That current was enough to melt the cable.
As the broken end whipped away from the shuttle, the plasma established electric contact with the ionosphere directly. The satellite on the distant end monitored the current: after about half a minute it stopped, then it reignited and flowed again for about another half minute, stopping for good when (presumably) all the trapped air was gone.
TSS-1R mission
Four years later, as a follow-up mission to TSS-1, the TSS-1R satellite was released in latter February 1996 from the Space Shuttle Columbia on the STS-75 mission.[6] The TSS-1R mission objective was to deploy the tether 20.7 km above the orbiter and remain there collecting data. The TSS-1R mission was to conduct exploratory experiments in space plasma physics. Projections indicated that the motion of the long conducting tether through the Earth’s magnetic field would produce an EMF that would drive a current through the tether system.
TSS-1R was deployed to 19.7 km when the tether broke. The break was attributed to an electrical discharge through a broken place in the insulation.[7]
Despite the termination of the tether deployment before full extension, the extension achieved was long enough to verify numerous scientific speculations. These findings included the measurements of the motional EMF,[8] the satellite potential,[9] the orbiter potential,[10] the current in the tether,[11] the changing resistance in the tether,[12] the charged particle distributions around a highly charged spherical satellite,[13] and the ambient electric field.[8] In addition, a significant finding concerns the current collection at different potentials on a spherical endmass. Measured currents on the tether far exceeded predictions of previous numerical models[14] by up to a factor of three. A more descriptive explanation of these results can be found in Thompson, et al..[15] Improvements have been made in modeling the electron charging of the shuttle and how it affects current collection,[11] and in the interaction of bodies with surrounding plasma, as well as the production of electrical power.[16]
A second mission, TSS-2, had been proposed to use the tether concept for upper atmospheric experimentation,[17] but was never flown.[18]
The TSS 1R mission was a reflight of the Tethered Satellite TSS 1. Five hours after deployment began on 25 February 1996, with 19.7 km (of 20.7 planned) of tether released, the tether cable suddenly snapped near the top of the deployment boom. The TSS satellite shot away into a higher orbit. TSS instruments could be re-actived and produced science data for three days until battery power ran out. An independent review panel was formed to review the TSS-1R failure.
Its magic how much prograde and retrograde bursts (even with small thrust) can impact orbit at right points of orbit.Only need to lower the orbital velocity from 7727m/s to 7637m/s to deorbit like the shuttle, a loss of 90m/s