The Very-Many-Questions-Not-Worth-Their-Own-Thread Thread XLIII

Go for a walk.

Our brains take rhythmic snapshots of the world as we walk – and we never knew
For decades, psychology departments around the world have studied human behaviour in darkened laboratories that restrict natural movement.

Our new study, published today in Nature Communications, challenges the wisdom of this approach. With the help of virtual reality (VR), we have revealed previously hidden aspects of perception that happen during a simple everyday action – walking.

We found the rhythmic movement of walking changes how sensitive we are to the surrounding environment. With every step we take, our perception cycles through “good” and “bad” phases.

This means your smooth, continuous experience of an afternoon stroll is deceptive. Instead, it’s as if your brain takes rhythmic snapshots of the world – and they are synchronised with the rhythm of your footfall.

The next step in studies of human perception
In psychology, the study of visual perception refers to how our brains use information from our eyes to create our experience of the world.

Typical psychology experiments that investigate visual perception involve darkened laboratory rooms where participants are asked to sit motionless in front of a computer screen.

Often, their heads will be fixed in position with a chin rest, and they will be asked to respond to any changes they might see on the screen.

This approach has been invaluable in building our knowledge of human perception, and the foundations of how our brains make sense of the world. But these scenarios are a far cry from how we experience the world every day.

This means we might not be able to generalise the results we discover in these highly restricted settings to the real world. It would be a bit like trying to understand fish behaviour, but only by studying fish in an aquarium.

Instead, we went out on a limb. Motivated by the fact our brains have evolved to support action, we set out to test vision during walking – one of our most frequent and everyday behaviours.

A walk in a (virtual) forest
Our key innovation was to use a wireless VR environment to test vision continuously while walking.

Several previous studies have examined the effects of light exercise on perception, but used treadmills or exercise bikes. While these methods are better than sitting still, they don’t match the ways we naturally move through the world.

Instead, we simulated an open forest. Our participants were free to roam, yet unknown to them, we were carefully tracking their head movement with every step they took.

We tracked head movement because as you walk, your head bobs up and down. Your head is lowest when both feet are on the ground and highest when swinging your leg in-between steps. We used these changes in head height to mark the phases of each participant’s “step-cycle”.

Participants also completed our visual task while they walked, which required looking for brief visual “flashes” they needed to detect as quickly as possible.

By aligning performance on our visual task to the phases of the step-cycle, we found visual perception was not consistent.

Instead, it oscillated like the ripples of a pond, cycling through good and bad periods with every step. We found that depending on the phases of their step-cycle, participants were more likely to sense changes in their environment, had faster reaction times, and were more likely to make decisions.


Oscillations in nature, oscillations in vision
Oscillations in vision have been shown before, but this is the first time they have been linked to walking.

Our key new finding is these oscillations slowed or increased to match the rhythm of a person’s step-cycle. On average, perception was best when swinging between steps, but the timing of these rhythms varied between participants. This new link between the body and mind offers clues as to how our brains coordinate perception and action during everyday behaviour.

Next, we want to investigate how these rhythms impact different populations. For example, certain psychiatric disorders can lead to people having abnormalities in their gait.

There are further questions we want to answer: are slips and falls more common for those with stronger oscillations in vision? Do similar oscillations occur for our perception of sound? What is the optimal timing for presenting information and responding to it when a person is moving?

Our findings also hint at broader questions about the nature of perception itself. How does the brain stitch together these rhythms in perception to give us our seamless experience of an evening stroll?

These questions were once the domain of philosophers, but we may be able to answer them, as we combine technology with action to better understand natural behaviour.

 
We tracked head movement because as you walk, your head bobs up and down. Your head is lowest when both feet are on the ground and highest when swinging your leg in-between steps. We used these changes in head height to mark the phases of each participant’s “step-cycle”.
I'm guessing they used able-bodied subjects for this, and not people who use mobility aids?

When I walk outside the apartment, I am ALWAYS looking at either the floor or the ground, because it's crucial to make sure I don't trip on anything and my walker has a smooth surface. Inside the apartment I'm still mindful of the floor, because Maddy seems to think I should have a magical ability to not trip over her or step on her, even in a dark hallway when I can't see her.
 
I'm guessing they used able-bodied subjects for this, and not people who use mobility aids?

When I walk outside the apartment, I am ALWAYS looking at either the floor or the ground, because it's crucial to make sure I don't trip on anything and my walker has a smooth surface. Inside the apartment I'm still mindful of the floor, because Maddy seems to think I should have a magical ability to not trip over her or step on her, even in a dark hallway when I can't see her.
I doubt that they are the point where they would consider lack of mobility yet, but your question goes to the very heart of a crisis in psychology, namely that of the reproducibility of experiments.

Many (at least 75%) of previous experiments which purported to "prove" some aspect of behaviour or other, have not been able to be reproduced in other labs, and IIRC up to 90% when repeated in other countries with different cultural underpinnings to the original one.

One major reason is that many experiments were conducted with (stay seated, this may be shocking) university psychology students! Hardly an unbiased set of subjects, but the results of the experiments are extrapolated to the population of that country, and then far too quickly to the whole wide world. :)

I look at the ground more than most because I'm a mathematician. I love floors with square tiles because, "Hey, free graph paper to stare at!"

The prof I worked with for about 15 years once told a group of us in the tea-room about he got the inspiration for a paper he had just written. The paper concerned drops of liquid on an inclined pane of glass. (It does have industrial applications!)

He said he was driving home from a conference on a rainy night when he noticed that one drop of rain on the windshield didn't slide downwards, as expected. It was held in place by a combination of surface tension and the force created by the oncoming air. He told us that he watched that one drop on the windshield for at least half an hour. I've never seen so many people slide-eye at the same time, trying not to laugh, or gasp in horror at the thought of driving when he's on the road.

And now you know why most universities have a Mathematics Department - it's cheaper than institutionalizing all of us. :)
 
I doubt that they are the point where they would consider lack of mobility yet, but your question goes to the very heart of a crisis in psychology, namely that of the reproducibility of experiments.

Many (at least 75%) of previous experiments which purported to "prove" some aspect of behaviour or other, have not been able to be reproduced in other labs, and IIRC up to 90% when repeated in other countries with different cultural underpinnings to the original one.

One major reason is that many experiments were conducted with (stay seated, this may be shocking) university psychology students! Hardly an unbiased set of subjects, but the results of the experiments are extrapolated to the population of that country, and then far too quickly to the whole wide world. :)

I look at the ground more than most because I'm a mathematician. I love floors with square tiles because, "Hey, free graph paper to stare at!"

The prof I worked with for about 15 years once told a group of us in the tea-room about he got the inspiration for a paper he had just written. The paper concerned drops of liquid on an inclined pane of glass. (It does have industrial applications!)

He said he was driving home from a conference on a rainy night when he noticed that one drop of rain on the windshield didn't slide downwards, as expected. It was held in place by a combination of surface tension and the force created by the oncoming air. He told us that he watched that one drop on the windshield for at least half an hour. I've never seen so many people slide-eye at the same time, trying not to laugh, or gasp in horror at the thought of driving when he's on the road.

And now you know why most universities have a Mathematics Department - it's cheaper than institutionalizing all of us. :)

I haven't taken math since my first year of college, when the instructor spoke in an accent nobody in the class could understand and our textbook was American. If you're going to teach math in Canada, don't use a textbook that babbles on about 5-ounce potatoes on one side of the scale and 7-ounce potatoes on the other side. We haven't used ounces here in nearly 50 years and it was an annoying distraction.
 
Have I had enough coffee? Y/N
Do I want more coffee? Y/N
Should I have more coffee? Y/N

:think:

Spoiler :
 
Decaf?
 
I'm fielding this question across my various social circles, since it turns out most people I know don't use AirBnB. It is an etiquette question.

If you rent a room in someone's home, is it considered socially acceptable or frowned upon to bring people back to your room? I don't really mean that in a sexual, euphemistic way; just in general. I am planning some travel and am used to hotels or entire apartments, so I'm not sure what the standard is. Do hosts generally expect it to just be you in the room if you're solo traveling? My ability to stay out is very limited, so it'd be nice if I could realistically keep spending time with people where I'm staying.

I found out that I can directly ask a host before booking, but I'd like to know a general sense before bugging several people months in advance with a question that could possibly be seen as ridiculous (on either end of the spectrum).
 
I'm fielding this question across my various social circles, since it turns out most people I know don't use AirBnB. It is an etiquette question.

If you rent a room in someone's home, is it considered socially acceptable or frowned upon to bring people back to your room? I don't really mean that in a sexual, euphemistic way; just in general. I am planning some travel and am used to hotels or entire apartments, so I'm not sure what the standard is. Do hosts generally expect it to just be you in the room if you're solo traveling? My ability to stay out is very limited, so it'd be nice if I could realistically keep spending time with people where I'm staying.

I found out that I can directly ask a host before booking, but I'd like to know a general sense before bugging several people months in advance with a question that could possibly be seen as ridiculous (on either end of the spectrum).
I've never used AirBnB, but if you sign a contract of any kind, I would think there would be some standard language about guests (e.g. renter is responsible for their behavior), and lessors could add something if they want to forbid guests, or add a rule like "guests have to leave by 11:00pm" or whatever. I assume 2 people renting a room together costs more than 1 person alone, so a guest of yours who might use the facilities is essentially a guest of theirs who didn't pay.
 
I'm fielding this question across my various social circles, since it turns out most people I know don't use AirBnB. It is an etiquette question.

If you rent a room in someone's home, is it considered socially acceptable or frowned upon to bring people back to your room? I don't really mean that in a sexual, euphemistic way; just in general. I am planning some travel and am used to hotels or entire apartments, so I'm not sure what the standard is. Do hosts generally expect it to just be you in the room if you're solo traveling? My ability to stay out is very limited, so it'd be nice if I could realistically keep spending time with people where I'm staying.

I found out that I can directly ask a host before booking, but I'd like to know a general sense before bugging several people months in advance with a question that could possibly be seen as ridiculous (on either end of the spectrum).

I/We use AirBnB a lot and generally the agreement is for x people to stay for x days. If you are staying in a room in someone's house, you should ask permission ahead of time if it is OK to bring a guest for one or more nights. You don't want to "surprise" them. The sudden arrival of an unexpected second person might appear to be a scheme to get a lower single person rate and then add your friend. The times that we have stayed in a house with the hosts, we have never associated with them except to to say Hi in passing or ask questions. They are renting a room for money and not likely looking for companions. Now in a Bread and Breakfast, the situation is different. Those hosts usually do want to mix with guests over meals or help guests in their stay in their city. the best path is to just ask your host ahead of time about bringing guests and whether you can share their living space outside of the room you rent with them. They will tell you what they expect, allow and prefer.
 
I was not thinking of having people actually sleep over and effectively becoming an extra guest, more so just existing within the four walls of my room for a while before they head home.
 
I was not thinking of having people actually sleep over and effectively becoming an extra guest, more so just existing within the four walls of my room for a while before they head home.
Oh, OK. Nonetheless, just ask you hosts ahead of time. It is the courteous thing to do.
 
Is anyone in the future ever going to use landline home phones?
They will all be dying off in the next decade or so....until there is a great revival like vinyl, then it will be a prestige item for the rich.
 
Last edited:
I am looking for an ornament (or anything that would fit) to attach to my deck, right at the base of a wooden support beam that's holding up a deck right above the deck in question. The reason: That part of the deck has been replaced, and I'm not an expert, so the quality of the work performed wasn't amazing in that particular spot. The easiest solution would be to cover it up with something.. but I'm not sure what. The area in question (that needs to be covered up) isn't very large. It's like.. 5cm x 20cm max. Probably closer to 3cm x 17cm. These measurements are for the base. As for the height of whatever I install there - that is basically unlimited.

At first I thought I'd be easily able to find maybe a flower pot or some sort of decorative statue that you can screw in to a post or the deck board.. but.. I can't really find anything like that. A lot of the cool stuff I found just isn't designed to be screwed in anywhere.. and all the stuff that screws in seems to be designed to screw in a very specific way or location. Decklights of some sort would work too, but all the ones I can find are designed to be attached in a different way than needed.

Ideally this would be something that I can screw into the deck board you walk on.. right by the post.. Or to the post itself. But it's also got to be something that wouldn't look out of place in that spot. I found this metal bracket that would be perfect actually, BUT it's a metal thing with a hole.. so there's no way to attach it to a post that's already in place.. it looks like a bracket you put down before the post is in place (and there's absolutely no way to move this one)

In theory this item doesn't really have to be attached.. but.. it just seems like that's a way better solution. I don't want this thing moving around.

To summarize: Picture a wooden post going straight up. I want to attach something to the spot where the post meets the deck board that you walk on, at the base. Like a little gnome, or a flower pot, or a decorative thingy, or a light, or something that wouldn't look out of place

Any ideas?
 
I am looking for an ornament (or anything that would fit) to attach to my deck, right at the base of a wooden support beam that's holding up a deck right above the deck in question. The reason: That part of the deck has been replaced, and I'm not an expert, so the quality of the work performed wasn't amazing in that particular spot. The easiest solution would be to cover it up with something.. but I'm not sure what. The area in question (that needs to be covered up) isn't very large. It's like.. 5cm x 20cm max. Probably closer to 3cm x 17cm. These measurements are for the base. As for the height of whatever I install there - that is basically unlimited.

At first I thought I'd be easily able to find maybe a flower pot or some sort of decorative statue that you can screw in to a post or the deck board.. but.. I can't really find anything like that. A lot of the cool stuff I found just isn't designed to be screwed in anywhere.. and all the stuff that screws in seems to be designed to screw in a very specific way or location. Decklights of some sort would work too, but all the ones I can find are designed to be attached in a different way than needed.

Ideally this would be something that I can screw into the deck board you walk on.. right by the post.. Or to the post itself. But it's also got to be something that wouldn't look out of place in that spot. I found this metal bracket that would be perfect actually, BUT it's a metal thing with a hole.. so there's no way to attach it to a post that's already in place.. it looks like a bracket you put down before the post is in place (and there's absolutely no way to move this one)

In theory this item doesn't really have to be attached.. but.. it just seems like that's a way better solution. I don't want this thing moving around.

To summarize: Picture a wooden post going straight up. I want to attach something to the spot where the post meets the deck board that you walk on, at the base. Like a little gnome, or a flower pot, or a decorative thingy, or a light, or something that wouldn't look out of place

Any ideas?

Can you post a pic?
 
Top Bottom