The World 1700

Originally posted by _Impreza_
right all im saying is some of the colonies are named wrong. I can tell u kinda rushed the details. jus a bit. take ur time a bit more. but i think this is one of the best scenarios i have played. very interesting. It was hard trying to get portugal to give its colonies up haha. I dunno what u can do with uprisings in south america which make the states of Brazil etc. It cant be historical the whole way through. Britain has never been to war with Portugal ever.

What i thought is if u could but a British army in south africa, India and Hong Kong? Oh yeah maybe a suez canal would work, cut the time to India. I find it helps in my games. Makes the world a bit smaller in a trade sense.

What u could do is put Prussia in, and some tribal Brazilian and Argentian and Mexican armies in south america ready to let history take it course in making no longer Portugal and Spain big powers. Well Italy i hard to do aswell. Cant u just put Italian states Unified? I know the importance of some states in the course of history but really they are not needed.

I like the Pirate ship ideas. In my last update of 1850-1900 before the new game is it ok if i use this concept even though these raids were fading away during this period?

Hmmmmmmm, i also think u should add an American army ready to take away Britains and France colonies. It would be cool if our scenarios could link together. Well i love the scenario. Great work. Try not to ruse into too many scenarios though.

Well cya then

Britain didn't have South Africa till 1815. The dutch had it in this time period.

Britain didn't have Hong Kong till 1841.

Britain only had a few settlements in India in 1700, the French had a few as well, and the Portuguese had a few.

The Suez Canal didn't exist till 1869.

Prussia in would be a good idea, as it became a kingdom in 1701 (though it was independent before this, this is when it assumed importance).

Pirating was pretty much gone by 1815, thanks to the USA and others taking them out.

Americans weren't ready to revolt in 1700 (this didn't really start to occur till about 1750).

Real good job Yoda Power, I'll have to give this scenario a try sometime.
 
Originally posted by Procifica
Real good job Yoda Power, I'll have to give this scenario a try sometime.

thanks, but i suggest you play it only if your computer is fast.:)
 
Originally posted by emu
the polish called it Gdansk the Germans renamed it koningburg

i know its kind of long time since the discussion but poland has never owned köningsberg, it has always been a preussian city in what is called east preussia until russia took it and renamed it kalliningrad, gdansk on the other hand has been polish and german under the name danzig.
 
Poland tried to invade the territory of the Germanic- slavic tribe of the Prussians, but they were not able to cope with them. So Duke Conrad of Masowien asked the German Order for help. Therefore they should get the reign over Prussia. They accepted and pacified and christianized the Prussians. This was about 1200. After ruling over 250 years relative peacefully, where many settlers came from Germany and many settlements were founded or enlarged, Marienburg, Danzig, Königsberg, Thorn for example, while Danzig and Königsberg became members of the Hanse and Danzig had the law of Lübeck, Poland and Lithunia became united. This was against the German order. They had to fight for their land, but lost the decisive battle of Tanneberg in 1454. Prussia became a Polish vassal and was divided. While East Prussia became the duchess of Prussia, later belonging to Brandenburg, West Prussia was anected by Poland. They tried to polonize this territory but at least in the towns like Danzig they were unsuccessfull. In the last decades of the 17th century after the 30 years war the Grand Elector could get independence from Poland. But only East Prussia was under the ruling of Brandenburg. In 1701 Prussia beacme a kingdom, But Frederic I. became only king IN Prussia. West Prussia became not part of Prussia until the the first Polish Division. Finally Prussia was reunited. Until 1919 when Poland got most parts of west Prussia and of course 1945, when Germany lost all of the areas east of the Oder- Neiße line. So originally East Prussia was never part of Poland ,while west Prussia was ruled by Poland, but inhabitated by (mostly) German.

Adler
 
Good job with India/Mughal Empire. As India I quickly subdued most of Persia and hope to vanquish it completely. Hopefully I don't suffer the same fate real India did in the 18th century, with respect to those pesky European colonists! :)
 
Well I'm a new-comer to the world of scenarios (though I've been playing Civ for years, on and off). I've been passing through scenarios posted in the (not recently updated) Index file, which lists them geographically/chronologically rather than when they were posted.

I'm still thoroughly enjoying this one. Others have found a few historical errors in your scenario here and there, but overall the way you set the game up has turned it into an interesting and realistic "what if" situation.

What if, for example, the pre-British Mughal Empire had stayed united rather than in-fighting, as the British became more aggressive in their colonialist policies? First, the British quickly lost their 2 settlements in India through culture flips. Then, Mughal armies of war elephants erased the Persian presence from modern Iran, Afghanistan and the former Soviet republics region. But China with its massive military and strong resources poses a constant threat from the east (as you may know, China went to war with India in 1967 over possession of Tibet) that frankly I don't know how I'm going to manage!

Fun stuff.
 
This is really petty, but I'm just curious as to why Madrid and London have universities...but Glasgow and Bologna don't.
 
@Metacomet-No, this scenario was "closed down" a long time ago.

@Calgacus-What can I say, I wouldn't such a mistake today, but then this was more than a year ago:p
 
Bummer, man i realy did like this one to bad it has been "Closed Down" it was so well thought out & a conquest version would have been cool. More time for other projects i guess. :(
 
I have a problem
When i load the conquest editor, i see the scenario.
But when i load the conquest/ civcontent/1650.bic, and i choose a civilzation, and configure everything, i load the scenario but the PC doesn´t load the scenario.
 
Just taking a brief look at the scenario, it looks like it was orginally made for Vanilla Civ3. That may be part of the problem. Are you getting some kind of error? Posting this would be very helpful.

Try importing this into the C3C editor, and saving it as a C3C file. Then try loading it with C3C. Dont' have it in front of me so I don't know if it will work that way.
 
Just taking a brief look at the scenario, it looks like it was orginally made for Vanilla Civ3. That may be part of the problem. Are you getting some kind of error? Posting this would be very helpful.

Try importing this into the C3C editor, and saving it as a C3C file. Then try loading it with C3C. Dont' have it in front of me so I don't know if it will work that way.

"What is Vanilla Civ3" I download this file from this page. The extension of C3C is *.biq, isn´t it?.
 
Vanilla Civ3 is the original version of civ, no PTW or C3C. Yes this scenario was made for Vanilla Civ3, and it really sucks you shouldn't play it.
 
Back
Top Bottom