I am not sure i completely agree with assertion that Andrew "got away with it". It seems to suggest he got away scot free. Sure - he did not have to go to court and testify. But even if he did, isnt it the case that 90% of those types of civil claims are settled out of court anyway? And would he not have possibly even paid less had he gone through the rigmarole of the court process. Im not sure it was ever likely he would have been prosecuted and sentenced. It was more a case that Charles could not allow his brother to testify in court because he would embarrass the Royal family when it was the queens jubillee. So he agreed to pay an over inflated sum to Virginia Giruffe in order to get her to drop it. So did he get away with it? Im not sure he did. He completely disgraced himself. Lost a lot of privileges he used to enjoy in the UK and paid out a lot of money. Whereas if he had gone to court the exact same things would have happened, only he would not have had to testify and he would probably have paid out quite a bit less than he did. The main thing i wonder is if he was prevented from testifying due to possible criminal proceedings in future. I am not sure we have heard the last of it at any rate.
I think the law is an ass when rape is "settled" in a civil case.