In most cases the average white Southerner hated blacks. They thought they were their intellectual inferiors and they were consequentially treated like dirt.
That's true. That doesn't mean that they would be willing to risk their live's to let the upper class Southern aristocracy. Like I said, look into it a bit more. Based on the written records and what is known, most of the lower class Southerners who had joind the war joined to defend the South against the North, not to defend Slavery, an intellectual debate that was far above them and didn't apply to them and their concerns. At least not enough to forge a serious arguement.
This trend continued long after the South lost the war and is still practiced by many even today.
Also true. This feeling was however greatly intensified because of the loss to the North and Lincoln's moral justification of it. The war ended up giving the slaves freedom while, in their eyes, left them in a position like dirt. Go back to 1866 and the average Southerner would tell you that they hated Lincoln and Northerners just as much as they hated blacks.
The average Southern white man during the Civil War despised the idea of the abolition of slavery because they feared what would happen next
The richer ones did because this translated badly for them. This was also greatly due to the cotton gin and resurgance of the slave trade that it had created.
To now try to claim the Civil War wasn't about slavery is like trying to claim the War in Iraq is about freeing a people from a mad tyrant, or 9/11, or some other convenient excuse.
But I
didn't say that the war wasn't because of slavery. I just said it wasn't
simply because of slavery. Slavery was indeed the spark that set up the civil war, as it made the powerful slave-holding part of Southern society worry about their future. To say that the Civil War was simply a matter of slavery vs. abolitionist is wrong, because it was merely the final straw upon many other differences between the North and South. I think you got your comparisment reversed. To say that attacking Iraq is to free the people is what Bush did to gain a moral justification from the American people. To say the civil war was just about slavery is just as bad. It was, just like iraqi freedom/people, the moral justification for the war.
Wrong. Britain, like the rest of Europe outlawed slavery long before we did.
I knew you'd say that. And I suppose this was a truly revolutionary decision on Britian's part, seeing the immense presence slave labor had in the predominantly rural country that was England during the industrial revolution. Let's be serious here. You think that if Britian controlled the South during this time that they would've abolished slavery as quickly? If they tried, it would've been the straw that broke the camels back, and the South would've just secceeded. Britian would've faced the same dillemnas the U.S. did and therefore wouldn't have been able to abolish slavery so quickly and efficiently.
It was an intentional flame and you got warned for it. Nuff said.
Where exactly did I get warned.
What? Isn't a nation's flag nothing more than a symbol for that nation? How can you differentiate them?
There in lies the conflict. You say that the nation of the CSA was based simply on slavery, and that the confederate flag was merely a symbol of this opression. I say that while slavery played a big role, there were many other factors, and that the CSA flag represents mostly these other factors. The CSA flag represents (in many people's minds) the South finally gaining independence and no longer being controlled by a country that was a polar opposite. Slavery was just a part of this to the average Southerner.
The bottom line is that the south has always had severe racial tendencies and they have always resented the north forcing them to give up their slaves. The Confederate battle flag represents this hatred and racism and many people in the South are still fighting the stupidest war of all time.
While it's true that the South has always had racial tendencies, to say that the Confederate battle flag represents the fight to enslave a people is wrong. It stands for a lot more to most people, and therefore people should be allowed to fly it if they wish. The only reason rednecks in the North wear it is because they want to represent racist beliefes, and they use the flag that has been associated with racist belief ever since the North won and created their version of history (war was to free the slaves... blah blah blah).