Shadylookin said:
christianity and paganism(most of christianity is borrowed from paganism)
As simple and with the same weigth of what u said my response is: "No it dosnt" deal with that
biblegod's morality(he seems to be quite vicious and mean)
Why? didnt your dad ever punished u? Did he enjoyed punishing u? or did he did for your own good?
why christianity and not some other religion
Theres no objective answer for that if thats what u are looking for.
Why jesus doesn't die for the sin of unbelief? Why did he have to die at all? Seems like a lot of work when God could just decide to say hey I'll let sinners in.
Thats because you are assuming God dosnt plan things and he does whatever he wants in whatever order he wants to. The bible says he is a god of order ( how else could the universe be so ordered?) The main problem is that what u believe comes from the dogma and little knowlededge u think u have teached by other christhian folk therefore this thread was created by me to at least edit the true and false critics made to God.
why biblegod needs/wants my worship and if I don't give it to him even if i'm moral why should I go to hell.
hell dosnt exist. the key word is need why do u assume he need too?. He let us do it out of undecerved misericordy.
And why would u go to "hell" ? often the simpliest logic works against the complicated philosophy...why does your dad punish you when u disobey him? does he needs for u to obey him? certanly not. The answer u give me...I will proceed from that.
Why do the gospels vary if they are supposed to describe the same event and are direct word of god. If they say there are errors why believe the whole story since it could also be filled with errors
because the apostols were different persons and with different proffesions, the way a lawyer describes an event is different from the way a medical doctor will. But they say the same.
Noah's Ark. Do I really have to explain here a man and his family built a boat and fit 2 of every living creature on a boat, when today the US navy is lucky to fit 5000 men on some of the biggest structures ever. Especially when you take into consideration that some animals are many times larger than humans(elephants, hippos, various primates, dinosaurs the list goes on and on) How would he collect all of said animals as well. Then since biblegod flooded the earth to kill off his creation what did they eat when they got off the boat(sure water is good for plants but not a flood covering all the earth. The best question is why not just kill the wicked instead of doing all that.
Thats like asking a painter why didnt he do his painting this way or that way.
About the food they didnt came out rigth away they spend years in the ark. All the details are not given so u can assume whatever the hell u want.
Why can you say about biblegod if he created the tree of knowledge of good and evil and told his creation not to eat it, but being omniscient knew they were going ot eat it. Then he punishes all of their decendence.
Once again Shady omnisence dosnt mean future sigth. If u can see the future u can choose not too. u can be omniscent of the present and past timeline. The future has infinit variables like: "if I wake up at 9:31 or at 9:32 things will differ.
Plus he does not punish us...imagine he had destroy adam and eve rigth tere then what about us? we would have never been born and we could have never had the chance to decide if we wanted to follow him or rebell like our parents. Its not punishment its a gift that we are alive even when things are like this.
virgin birth, come on now were not 5 year olds. Besides even if it were possible the child of a virgin would have to be a woman because since there was no sperm there would be no sperm carrying a y chromosome meaning it would have to be a girl.
U seem to mold the bible to make critics however u please. Now we know a virgin can get pregnant rigth?. Well if God is omnipotent and omniscent ( how u present him whne u wanna make critics about him) then whats the problem of he doing that?. im srry but if your going to take the bible god actions without reffering to his atributes and reffer to his atributes whenever u feel u can make a critic about them...its a simple 2 standard speech.
There are no secular references of Jesus until after the 2nd century(by that time the legend had probably gotten around.
Not before ppl complained. plus if u look at Jesus miracles he didnt do them for publicity as a matter of fact he did them and told the person to saty in silence.
When the gospel was written the persons that knew jesus and the apostols were still alive so they could easily stop the lie. Plus the jewhis autorithys had a lot of power back then if the story was just a legend and so they would have never let it extent in such a way.
I don't know if anyone else is going to call bull, but I am.
i will in what u think your way of reasoning and your double and hypocrite speech.
